<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for alain94040</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/alain94040/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/alain94040/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 11:25:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Les mythes de l’entrepreneur: les sirènes des US</title><link>http://www.frenchweb.fr/les-mythes-de-lentrepreneur-les-sirenes-des-us/221924#comment-2446639264</link><description>&lt;p&gt;On est d'accord sur le fait qu'il faut arreter de toujours critiquer la France. J'ai géré un incubateur a Paris, je vis dans la Silicon Valley, j'ai vu les deux cotes. Aux USA, tu montes ta boite, tu ne recois rien de l'état, pas un centime. Pire: tu perds ton assurance maladie. Pas d'indemnités chômage non plus. Et pourtant beaucoup tentent l'aventure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;En France, certes, on peut ramasser des sommes significatives auprès de partenaires semi-publics. Les sommes sont juste assez fortes pour qu'on ne veuille pas s'en passer. Mais soyons réalistes: les "juges" publics sont incapable de faire la difference entre une startup a potentiel et une boite de service sans intérêt. Ils ont un budget annuel a dépenser aux startups, et ils en donnent un peu a chacun. Donc oui, c'est plus facile pour les projets faibles de lever un peu d'argent, mais pour ce qui est d'accélérer les quelques projets qui peuvent vraiment exploser, il n'y a personne. Ce n'est pas une critique, c'est la situation actuelle. Ca a du pour et du contre.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 11:25:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Après un échec, que deviennent les entrepreneurs et les salariés des start-up?</title><link>http://www.frenchweb.fr/apres-un-echec-que-deviennent-les-entrepreneurs-et-les-salaries-des-start-up/218821#comment-2434856359</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Merci Olivier pour cet excellent expose, comme d'habitude. Dans l'ensemble, un ecosysteme qui vit sa vie, c'est plutot sain. Plus vous aurez de gens dans la derniere catégorie (fondateurs qui reussissent et deviennent business angel), mieux l'ecosysteme se portera. Ca prend du temps, mais quand je compare a 2008 par exemple, ca a l'air d'aller beaucoup mieux en France.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 11:43:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should you be an angel investor?</title><link>http://calacanis.com/2015/01/09/should-you-be-an-angel-investor/#comment-1783711769</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Some of us do it to help the next generation of entrepreneurs. If we get a decent return, that's icing on the cake.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 22:45:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Exhibitors</title><link>http://thestartupconference.com/sponsors/#comment-476789818</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Startup Village is focused on high-tech startups. People want to meet the next Facebook or Dropbox.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:54:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Exhibitors</title><link>http://thestartupconference.com/sponsors/#comment-474868609</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's part of the plan, comin soon...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:36:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Exhibitors</title><link>http://thestartupconference.com/sponsors/#comment-461928603</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Videos of most talks are available, check the video archives. But we don't have text transcripts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:51:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Call for Speakers</title><link>http://thestartupconference.com/call-for-speakers/#comment-461927645</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's because the domain is not "founder" but "foundrs".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:49:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Call for Speakers</title><link>http://thestartupconference.com/call-for-speakers/#comment-456981844</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The instructions are listed above, with the contact email address. That being said, the speakers we normally are looking for are serial entrepreneurs, founders and investors.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:26:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Want AVC To Go Dark On The 18th</title><link>http://avc.com/2012/01/i-want-avc-to-go-dark-on-the-18th/#comment-411230226</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You should redirect your domain for a day to &lt;a href="http://ninjavideo.net/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ninjavideo.net/"&gt;http://ninjavideo.net/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why? Because it's the closest to what SOPA will look like: official seizure of websites by the US government. The more people can see what it looks like *for real*, the better. No arguments or talk. Just show them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:19:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Want AVC To Go Dark On The 18th</title><link>http://avc.com/2012/01/i-want-avc-to-go-dark-on-the-18th/#comment-411229815</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Redirect your &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:18:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple vs. Samsung: The Trolls Win</title><link>http://blog.foundrs.com/2012/01/02/apple-vs-samsung-the-trolls-win/#comment-399138960</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The why is fairly obvious: it's easier to copy something that is proven, than take a risk. Look at the PC clone industry for instance. The fight was to build the cheapest hardware possible, not to innovate and differentiate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In that world, there would still be some players who try to be different, but they are more likely to be crushed by the combined power of the clone industry.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:05:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://cgiorgi.tumblr.com/post/15185886344</title><link>http://cgiorgi.tumblr.com/post/15185886344#comment-398876092</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats. And by the way, 2012 is looking pretty good on the economic front, just don't tell Europe :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 11:24:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kid studies Java as a second language instead of Spanish; should more do so? | VentureBeat</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2011/11/05/java-as-a-second-language/#comment-356610718</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That doesn't make sense. Learning a foreign language has nothing to do with science and math. It's a great way to open your mind to other cultures, learn that what you take for granted is done differently in other places.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also support more programming in school, but not at the expense of soft skills.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 15:39:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://venturebeat.com/2011/11/02/klout-profiles-privacy/</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2011/11/02/klout-profiles-privacy/#comment-354411138</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is no good reason for Klout to have observer profiles. They could keep that data internal to their algorithms, and no one would ever know or care. The only Reason I can think of is that they are soft-spamming people: if you google your name once in a while, you are bound to eventually notice the Klout link. Their hope is that you then sign-up and become a user. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 23:41:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Controversial First Role to Hire After Your &amp;#8220;A Round&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2011/10/28/the-controversial-first-role-to-hire-after-your-a-round/#comment-348553441</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed, a great admin is worth their weight in gold. By the time reaches 4-6 people, it will be a time-saver. Just get a great one (like every hire you make), don't underestimate how important of a role it is, and. Care.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 20:10:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Allegations of past and present Internet crime haunt Airbnb co-founder | VentureBeat</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2011/10/27/airbnb-spam-allegations/#comment-347512208</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wouldn't be too concerned about the money transfers regulations. You would need some serious legal study to find out what applies and doesn't apply.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But having a known spammer on board is definitely not cool. I'd like to hear much more from the company than a "no comment."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:24:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Startup Pitch Competition is On at the Los Angeles Startup Conference 2011</title><link>http://blog.foundrs.com/2011/10/05/the-startup-pitch-competition-is-on-at-the-los-angeles-startup-conference-2011/#comment-345889378</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good question. Yes, you do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:08:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No CEO Is Worth Their Multi Million Dollar Paycheck. Except&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://blog.foundrs.com/2011/08/27/no-ceo-is-worth-their-multi-million-dollar-paycheck-except/#comment-303602152</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Or to rephrase it differently, if you are the worst of your class, maybe you should feel it in your paycheck :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 12:20:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No CEO Is Worth Their Multi Million Dollar Paycheck. Except&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://blog.foundrs.com/2011/08/27/no-ceo-is-worth-their-multi-million-dollar-paycheck-except/#comment-303601343</link><description>&lt;p&gt;CEO's salaries are easily adjusted for inflation. But when issuing stock grants, I can't think of any way to adjust for inflation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 12:19:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Users Say &amp;#8220;No Thanks&amp;#8221; to Free Money</title><link>http://blog.foundrs.com/2011/08/17/my-users-say-no-thanks-to-free-money/#comment-289682610</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting. It goes without saying that I had been asking people to share links before. That experiment specifically wanted to find out if a financial incentive made a difference. I was surprised to find out that it doesn't.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:01:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 10 Angel Investor Groups</title><link>http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/220149#comment-289369822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jason,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You are using the wrong metrics: number of angels is absolutely meaningless. There are many angel groups which are nothing more than a social club for retired executives, and the entrepreneurs pitching are the mid-dinner entertainment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And there are serious angel groups that make real investments in real startups. When you look at sites like Angelist, you can guess that the future is closer to online angel groups, with loose "friendish" relationships, rather than formal groups. That's why the number of members of a static group is likely to become a negative signal of an angel group that is on its way out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:42:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The anatomy of a fundable startup | VentureBeat</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2011/06/21/the-anatomy-of-a-fundable-startup/#comment-231748756</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you misread the advice. Yes, try to do everything well. But one thing must be outstanding. Very good overall doesn't cut it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 04:52:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flip creator gets into the grilled cheese business, Sequoia invests</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2011/06/01/the-melt-flip-sequoia/#comment-215607369</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That actually makes a lot of sense.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Everyone in Silicon Valley has wanted to build an iPhone app that allows you to pre-order your coffee at Starbucks. Jonathan's approach is the obvious way to make that happen (start with owning the whole process, from app to restaurant, then expand to existing chains).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:12:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Demystifying Your Reputation</title><link>http://blog.letslunch.com/2011/05/17/demystifying-your-reputation/#comment-205107152</link><description>&lt;p&gt; You are correct, except user feedback doesn't use the same scale. So if your reputation is 5, like the article says, that's quite high. But a user giving you a feedback of 5 is pretty weak. The two scales are different and our algorithm will use data from the lunch feedback to update the reputation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 12:32:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A host of new features on LetsLunch: 1. Calendar</title><link>http://blog.letslunch.com/2011/04/21/a-host-of-new-features-on-letslunch-1-calendar/#comment-203236622</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the report. You can use the "feedback" widget on the left hand side of all pages, this way you can enter issues and other users can also vote and confirm problems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We'll look into the jpeg problem. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alain94040</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 16:31:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>