<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for alagesan</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/alagesan/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/alagesan/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:56:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: All we want are the facts, ma'am</title><link>http://norvig.com/fact-check.html#comment-6695855</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have one doubt regarding "free will". Even probability is just a way of quantifying what we don't know by using previous statistical results. Everything seems to be deterministic with cause and effect relationship. I don't think some local randomness can be thought of as free will, like for example at this moment I can choose to either type in this comment or just stare at the monitor. I am not convinced to think this ability to choose as free well. Even the previous example may not be random, as I don't know the causes and so I claim it to be random. So then what exactly is free will? It appears as if free will should be equivalent to randomness.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alagesan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:56:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>