<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for adir1</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/adir1/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/adir1/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2014 12:14:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 
        Advertising an Android game: Facebook vs. AdMob
      </title><link>http://www.war-worlds.com/blog/2014/01/advertising-an-android-game-facebook-vs-admob#comment-1217568744</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good writeup, thanks! &lt;br&gt;I'll tell you something else you need to add here - How many installs you got from being around the top of Hacker News! I gather that would be highest number yet.&lt;br&gt;Well, off to try the game meanwhile...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2014 12:14:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: XSS in Google Finance | Michele Spagnuolo's Blog</title><link>https://miki.it/blog/2013/7/30/xss-in-google-finance/#comment-981963346</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good catch - you didn't explain though why executing rogue script under guise of &lt;a href="http://Google.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Google.com"&gt;Google.com&lt;/a&gt; is such a bad thing. Is it just that others will be able to execute things under your Google profile, or something more?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 19:12:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Interview Question Too Many Developers Get Wrong</title><link>http://openmymind.net/An-Interview-Question-Too-Many-Developers-Get-Wrong/#comment-874799393</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But there are video games on Mac also now - Conundrum...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:32:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Episode 141 - Magic Wand Keyboard Connector, Upgradable TVs, Apple&amp;apos;s Subscription Plan, Netflix Arrives on Boxee Box, Vodafone&amp;apos;s Webbox</title><link>http://revision3.com/geekbeattv/2011-02-16#comment-429479583</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is just amazing shirt with beautiful sleeves - any idea where are these sold?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:51:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Some NoSQL Technologies Going NoWHERE?</title><link>http://nosql.mypopescu.com/post/15373898387#comment-401909226</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To me biggest NoSQL database feature is lack of locking, allowing for highly concurrent environment. Of course you have to rethink your software, but after that - Goodbye Relational Limits.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:57:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trouble in the House of Stackoverflow</title><link>http://blog.thecloudblocks.com/post/14016289180#comment-383588536</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Frankly, I always thought that if candidate comes to me with 100k plus in SO score, It is a RED warning sign. It is a sign that someone enjoys round-the-clock Internet surfing, instead of Work!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:12:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google App Engine [gae]</title><link>http://www.playframework.org/modules/gae#comment-370666364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that GAE finally supports full SQL (in beta), any plans to update this module for better integration?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 03:07:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quantum Phantom prototype lets you control your computer screen with a webcam (video)</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/12/quantum-phantom-prototype-lets-you-control-your-computer-screen/#comment-284888560</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ha, I patented this 10 years ago!!! Well, actually I didn't, but I could have, as I thought of it at least 10 years ago and could easily have prepared all those silly Patent documents. Except for I don't believe in Software Patents or even "Computer Interaction" patents or other such abstract concepts (like Buy It Now button patent, remember?!). &lt;br&gt;This is exactly why!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:44:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dear Lars, next time don&amp;#8217;t stop doing that weird drug</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/11/01/dear-lars-next-time-dont-stop-doing-that-weird-drug/#comment-93249235</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wave was a great concept and I do agree that biggest pitfalls were around trying to get Adoption. For that, people needed to "fit" this new "thing" into pre-existing notions (is it email? blog? forum? etc).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since people couldn't "place" it, they didn't know how to approach &amp;amp; use it. As happens with many great new things, this is where you have the biggest challenge to keep with it. Keep perfecting your vision where you want it to go, while spending every waking moment telling people that they Don't Know What's Good For Them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, whether we call it the New Drug or just visionary fever or what-have-ya, you do need to keep doing it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 03:28:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A taxonomy of transparency</title><link>https://buzzmachine.com/2010/10/23/a-taxonomy-of-transparency/#comment-520507063</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I believe some of it is already there at &lt;a href="http://www.data.gov" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.data.gov"&gt;www.data.gov&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The trouble can be that even when information is out there, too few of us will take the time to review it, understand it and act upon it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 05:14:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Install Flash Player on 64-bit Linux</title><link>https://www.jamesward.com/2010/09/15/install-flash-player-on-64-bit-linux/#comment-362473025</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just installed it into my IE9 64 Bit Beta. Works great!!! I've been waiting for Flash in 64 Bit browser.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Finally! Thanks for tip!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:26:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple&amp;#8217;s Ping is a big pile of steaming dung</title><link>https://swizec.com/blog/apples-ping-is-a-big-pile-of-steaming-dung/swizec/1444#comment-170635449</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Grats on hitting TechMeme!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyhow, completely agree with you. I had exactly Same thoughts, to the bullet, when I signed up yesterday.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And now that they lost Facebook integration, it's slow and painful death... Unless they start RE-ENGINEERING and fast..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 13:55:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs  :  There is no spoon</title><link>http://www.fakesteve.net/2010/06/there-is-no-spoon.html#comment-58921939</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I tried to share this on my Facebook, but there is no Facebook. And then I realized there is no Internet either.&lt;br&gt;Excellent post, definitely the best one yet!&lt;br&gt;Oh yea, and my iPhone 4 has no Antenna issue!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 02:30:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congratulations to Soluto for winning Techcrunch Disrupt</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/05/27/congratulations-to-soluto-for-winning-techcrunch-disrupt/#comment-53318710</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, this makes no sense.&lt;br&gt;First of all - All my Windows 7 machines start in seconds, and don't crash, so no frustrations!&lt;br&gt;Second - OS starts background services and other startup software simultaneously and usually at lower I/O and CPU priority, so on multi-core system it is hard to see much impact of things start nor know that eliminating something specific will speed things up by much.&lt;br&gt;Looks like 2 years 2 late, would be great on XP or even on Vista, most likely...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 22:20:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Much ado about privacy on Facebook (I wish Facebook were MORE open!!!)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/05/08/much-ado-about-privacy-on-facebook-are-we-protesting-too-much/#comment-49432272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for reply, and I am definitely working hard to educate women in my life on that.&lt;br&gt;I think everyone agrees that Facebook can do more in this department as well, starting by setting defaults to As Private as Possible, rather than Public with few exceptions...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 20:42:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Much ado about privacy on Facebook (I wish Facebook were MORE open!!!)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/05/08/much-ado-about-privacy-on-facebook-are-we-protesting-too-much/#comment-49414239</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert, first - I am with you and I am pretty much Ok with everything I post on Facebook being totally public.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;HOWEVER, ask most young women out there and they will tell you how important privacy is to them. It is of course for obvious reasons - but I ask you, should we just tell them just to stay away from Facebook and alike sites? It seems ironic, since that is the population that traditionally loved to SHARE most (and likely top facebook users already).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 18:28:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Much ado about privacy on Facebook (I wish Facebook were MORE open!!!)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/05/08/much-ado-about-privacy-on-facebook-are-we-protesting-too-much/#comment-49413517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It could be that person who's original post you commented on has "allow friends of friends to see posts", which I believe is the default.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 18:24:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An inch closer to the end of privacy (thanks Facebook!)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/04/25/an-inch-closer-to-the-end-of-privacy-thanks-facebook/#comment-46632686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Specifically about Music - Zune Social had this over a year ago, as I recall. In fact, it's fancier - as it uploads your music listening history from offline device, once you sync. So you could be thinking you listening offline in your private little space, but it gets published later to the world.&lt;br&gt;Though, I welcome it - we just all need to learn to manage this new found publicity we all got.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 23:18:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Bad Crossdomain Policies Expose Protected Data to Malicious Applications</title><link>https://www.jamesward.com/2009/11/08/how-bad-crossdomain-policies-expose-protected-data-to-malicious-applications/#comment-362500826</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Follow-up comment to my own comment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;After spending more time thinking about it, I think I understand now. The malicious app is making a request to the original resource on &lt;a href="http://firststepsinflex.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="firststepsinflex.com"&gt;firststepsinflex.com&lt;/a&gt; . Browser sends a cookie there, because that is where the cookie originated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, I am actually in agreement with Ricardo that crossdomain policy is a weak link in this approach. Can you talk a bit (perhaps in a next blog) about alternatives to securing BlazeDS app via web-service tokens, rather than cookie/basic auth?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:27:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Bad Crossdomain Policies Expose Protected Data to Malicious Applications</title><link>https://www.jamesward.com/2009/11/08/how-bad-crossdomain-policies-expose-protected-data-to-malicious-applications/#comment-362500825</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great article and discussion, but I feel like I am still missing something.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your entire attack vector is based on "you are already authenticated" fact, but shouldn't cookies follow the server origin policy? That is, the session cookie should only be sent to original server it came from, no? The cross domain policy helps with access to other resources to be pulled in, but the outgoing request to those other domains shouldn't really contain the source cookie from &lt;a href="http://firststepsinflex.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="firststepsinflex.com"&gt;firststepsinflex.com&lt;/a&gt; domain, as I understand the HTTP specs...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can you shed some light on this?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:14:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Results From the Legal Collections Test</title><link>http://blogtest.theprosperblog.com/2009/11/03/the-results-from-the-legal-collections-test/#comment-574953962</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As someone with some number of older 2007 loans that were "written off", I find this long blog post to be very important.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't feel that I fully understand that the new loans (notes) being issued right now by Prosper are fully "legally tested" and will fare better in the future collection efforts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In addition, one of the things I hear "around the net" is that people try to use "it was not my loan" or "I never got the money, someone used my SSN and address" strategy. I understand that if Prosper identifies that such fraud really happened (someone really did steal SSN, etc), lenders are protected by Prosper. But what about cases where Prosper determines that actual laon went to the right person, and the claim itself is a lie now?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:01:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Results From the Legal Collections Test</title><link>http://blog.sk/2009/11/03/the-results-from-the-legal-collections-test/#comment-574943949</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As someone with some number of older 2007 loans that were "written off", I find this long blog post to be very important.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't feel that I fully understand that the new loans (notes) being issued right now by Prosper are fully "legally tested" and will fare better in the future collection efforts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In addition, one of the things I hear "around the net" is that people try to use "it was not my loan" or "I never got the money, someone used my SSN and address" strategy. I understand that if Prosper identifies that such fraud really happened (someone really did steal SSN, etc), lenders are protected by Prosper. But what about cases where Prosper determines that actual laon went to the right person, and the claim itself is a lie now?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:01:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Results From the Legal Collections Test</title><link>http://blog.prosper.com/2009/11/03/the-results-from-the-legal-collections-test/#comment-662533111</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As someone with some number of older 2007 loans that were "written off", I find this long blog post to be very important.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't feel that I fully understand that the new loans (notes) being issued right now by Prosper are fully "legally tested" and will fare better in the future collection efforts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In addition, one of the things I hear "around the net" is that people try to use "it was not my loan" or "I never got the money, someone used my SSN and address" strategy. I understand that if Prosper identifies that such fraud really happened (someone really did steal SSN, etc), lenders are protected by Prosper. But what about cases where Prosper determines that actual laon went to the right person, and the claim itself is a lie now?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:01:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The chat room/forum problem (&amp;#038; an apology to @Technosailor)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/02/the-chat-roomforum-problem-an-apology-to-technosailor/#comment-21692918</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So what's next? Google Wave? or more Twitter?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think the Blogs are where it's at, and even while I continue to use some Twitter, Friendfeed and some Google Reader social features, the Blog is where quality conversation will remain!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now, lets figure out how to grow Blogs, Disqus is a step in the right direction, but not it. I think MovableType has something up their sleeve on real-time conversation around blog posts, and hopefully Wordpress will have something also (since that's my platform of choice right now).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:38:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The biggest loser in the Twitter search deals</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/22/the-biggest-loser-in-the-twitter-search-deals/#comment-20784528</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can see where Facebook will continue and combine private family/friends interactions with public fan/businesses/media interactions, and so far I see them doing good job of keeping it separate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think we need to keep in mind that for search engines social and real-time is only a fraction of functionality. It can help spot trends and maybe more (with potential deal where Facebook can share people's Like ratings, and finding celebrities with more "fans"), but majority of their Core functionality is pure "Ask and Answer" research type of queries!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Speaking of which, I wonder if anyone has actual statistics which tries to separate Trending queries versus Research queries, to show us a nice pie? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adir1</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:02:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>