<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for adam_hartung</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/adam_hartung/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/adam_hartung/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 13:31:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: As Disney Board Chair, What Would You Advise CEO Bob Chapek Regarding 'Don’t Say Gay'?</title><link>https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/what-would-you-advise-disney-ceo-bob-chapek-regarding-dont-say-gay#comment-5819243452</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Business leaders of major corporations control budgets larger than most states, and control the lives of employees and suppliers that are larger than state agencies.  They have an obligation to lead - not just manage for financial returns.  Too many CEOs opt-out of being leaders, lazily defining their role much too narrowly.  The have an obligation to demonstrate leadership, speaking for employees, gig workers and suppliers that do not have the voice these CEOs have in society by virtue of their power.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 13:31:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Allstate and other advertisers are worried about after the O'Reilly controversy</title><link>http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20170405/NEWS06/170409941/what-allstate-and-other-advertisers-are-worried-about-after-the-oreilly-controversy#comment-3243280683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes reported on the big risks of automated ad buying for advertisers last December - more people should have taken this seriously back then!  &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/2oJ5DqT" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/2oJ5DqT"&gt;http://bit.ly/2oJ5DqT&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 13:40:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McDonald&amp;#039;s earnings: $1.25 per share, vs expected EPS of $1.38</title><link>http://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/26/mcdonalds-reporting-second-quarter-2016-earnings.html#comment-2806747117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes points out that despite the run-up in value over last year, McDonald's has been in a Growth Stall for 2 years - and nothing the new CEO has addressed the fact that customers find competitive offerings more appealing.  Warns investors to be wary &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/2ahpVAft" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/2ahpVAft"&gt;http://bit.ly/2ahpVAft&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:41:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple&amp;rsquo;s earnings beat has some analysts worried it was too impressive</title><link>http://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/27/apples-earnings-beat-iphone-ipad-tim-cook.html#comment-2806693805</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But can working on iPhone line extensions really push Apple to higher revenue?  Forbes says that unless entire new product solutions emerge investors need to be very wary &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/2ahpVAf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/2ahpVAf"&gt;http://bit.ly/2ahpVAf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:15:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft to buy LinkedIn</title><link>http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/13/microsoft-to-buy-linkedin.html#comment-2752132843</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Said with your tongue firmly in your cheek, I can tell, Pi May. Thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2016 18:55:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft to buy LinkedIn</title><link>http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/13/microsoft-to-buy-linkedin.html#comment-2730797265</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes points out that this acquisition is probably the next aQuantive - and Microsoft investors will rue this day &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/1OnLX40" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/1OnLX40"&gt;http://onforb.es/1OnLX40&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:34:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Innovation Fails (And How to Succeed)</title><link>http://www.innovationmanagement.se/2016/05/24/why-innovation-fails-and-how-to-succeed/#comment-2709142027</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In case you thought this was a novel idea - Read "Create Marketplace Disruption" published by Financial Times Press in 2009. Offers much deeper insight to the causes of the problem and how to solve it beyond the snippet in this article &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Create-Marketplace-Disruption-Competition-paperback/dp/013706487X" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.amazon.com/Create-Marketplace-Disruption-Competition-paperback/dp/013706487X"&gt;http://www.amazon.com/Creat...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 17:43:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wal-Mart posts earnings of 98 cents a share vs. 88 cents expected</title><link>http://www.cnbc.com/2016/05/19/walmart-q1-earnings.html#comment-2686511751</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes points out that at $70/share WMT is barely trading at the low end of its range from June 2012 thru August 2015 - and well off its January, 2015 highs. 7% year-over-year growth in on-line sales is half the industry growth rate.  WMT efforts to defend &amp;amp; extend the store model show limited success as the company isn't even worth the value of its hard assets - while those focused on ecommerce are thriving &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/20fyKLb" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/20fyKLb"&gt;http://onforb.es/20fyKLb&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 12:23:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: U.S. e-commerce grows 14.6% in 2015</title><link>https://www.internetretailer.com/2016/02/17/us-e-commerce-grows-146-2015#comment-2686499962</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's now May, and WalMart just announced its first quarter 2016 on-line sales grew a meager 7% vs year ago - far off the industry growth rate. Forbes says its asset intensive strategy is not competitive with on-line retailers like Amazon &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/20fyKLb" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/20fyKLb"&gt;http://onforb.es/20fyKLb&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 12:15:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sears has lost shareholders much of their investment</title><link>http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20160513/ISSUE10/160519923/sears-has-lost-shareholders-much-of-their-investment#comment-2677485836</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes overviews how Lampert systematically destroyed all value at Sears by focusing on cost cutting while the industry shifted.  More innovation, and investment in trends, could have saved the retailer - but Lampert was too myopic to make the right decisions. &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/27pJCLZ" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/27pJCLZ"&gt;http://onforb.es/27pJCLZ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2016 17:57:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IPhone sales drop; Apple misses Wall Street expectations</title><link>http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_29816056/iphone-sales-drop-apple-misses-wall-street-expectations#comment-2647559004</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thirteen years of year-over-year sales growth is a great record.  And one decline is not a predictor.  But Forbes mag points out that if Q2 sees another decline then Apple slips into a Growth Stall, and that portends disaster for investors &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/26xoJhq" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/26xoJhq"&gt;http://onforb.es/26xoJhq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:24:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple and Twitter are pummeled, eBay up after results</title><link>http://www.siliconbeat.com/2016/04/27/apple-twitter-pummeled-ebay-soars-earnings-results/#comment-2647555740</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there any hope for Twitter shareholders?  The stock is down 60% since the Board replaced Costolo as CEO.  Forbes said at the time making the change was a poor call &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/1qYi3bw" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/1qYi3bw"&gt;http://onforb.es/1qYi3bw&lt;/a&gt; . One quarter of declining sales is not predictive, but 2 consecutive quarters leads to a growth stall - and Forbes warns that could be deadly for Apple investors &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/26xoJhq" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/26xoJhq"&gt;http://onforb.es/26xoJhq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:22:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Poor Results Mean For Apple, Chipotle And Exxon Mobil</title><link>http://hereandnow.wbur.org/2016/04/27/apple-chipotle-exxon-mobil#comment-2647491755</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes mag compared Apple, Chipotle and Facebook. Focusing on the former 2, Chipotle's 2 consecutive negative growth quarters put it in a Growth Stall, and there are likely far deeper problems than just food handling.  Investors beware.  Meanwhile Apple must return to growth in Q2, or it too will fall into a Growth Stall and investors will turn even more fearful regarding the company's future prospects. &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/26xoJhq" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/26xoJhq"&gt;http://onforb.es/26xoJhq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:51:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Time for a shake-up at United Airlines</title><link>http://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/09/time-for-a-shake-up-at-united-airlines-commentary.html#comment-2569707734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No doubt United performance is in need of some improvement.  But Forbes mag took a look at the newly proposed Board slate and questioned if it had a strategy that would be any better than existing leadership &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/1Wlr6gB" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/1Wlr6gB"&gt;http://onforb.es/1Wlr6gB&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:57:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sears will write down value of brand name by up to $200 million - Consumer News - Crain's Chicago Business</title><link>http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20160210/NEWS07/160209793&amp;Nocache=1&amp;cachebust=XYMR#comment-2508796388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes gives a real send-off to Chairman Lampert with the 5 ways he destroyed almost $10B of shareholder value as SHLD leader &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/1PpqB2S" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/1PpqB2S"&gt;http://onforb.es/1PpqB2S&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:05:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon CEO confirms interest in acquiring Yahoo&amp;#039;s assets</title><link>http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizon-ceo-confirms-interest-acquiring-yahoos-assets/2016-02-08#comment-2506532456</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Forbes.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Forbes.com"&gt;Forbes.com&lt;/a&gt; looked into the opportunity and found 4 good reasons VZ should buy YHOO's core business &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/1T7LlOY" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/1T7LlOY"&gt;http://onforb.es/1T7LlOY&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:47:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon CEO confirms interest in buying Yahoo</title><link>http://www.cnbc.com/2016/02/06/verizon-ceo-confirms-interest-in-buying-yahoo.html#comment-2506490570</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes analyst looks at the difference between Yahoo as freestanding business and its value to Verizon and comes up with 4 good reasons the deal could be a win/win for all shareholders &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/1T7LlOY" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/1T7LlOY"&gt;http://onforb.es/1T7LlOY&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:24:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s payday for PayPal: PayPal&amp;#8217;s now worth $50 billion and eBay only $35 billion</title><link>https://www.geekwire.com/2015/its-payday-for-paypal-paypals-now-worth-50-billion-and-ebay-only-35-billion/#comment-2170877854</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes analyzed the innovation at Paypal and concluded it was a game changer in financial services likely to have ongoing explosive revenue growth. eBay has lost its innovation edge, is slowly becoming irrelevant in ecommmerce compared to competition, and its revenues will continue to slide. Paypal is likely undervalued, and eBay is likely overvalued &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/1VVq4t5" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/1VVq4t5"&gt;http://onforb.es/1VVq4t5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2015 16:35:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stock Exchange: PayPal is worth more than eBay</title><link>http://www.unlockpwd.com/stock-exchange-paypal-is-worth-more-than-ebay/#comment-2170868787</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes analyzed the innovation investments in both Paypal and eBay.  Concludes Paypal has emerged as a game changer for financial services, likely to dramatically grow revenues (like Amazon,) while eBay has sat on its laurels too long and will continue to decline.  Paypal is likely undervalued, eBay is likely overvalued &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/1VVq4t5" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/1VVq4t5"&gt;http://onforb.es/1VVq4t5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2015 16:28:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Independent PayPal Already Worth More Than eBay</title><link>http://www.nextpowerup.com/news/22630/independent-paypal-already-worth-more-than-ebay/#comment-2170866328</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes analyzed Paypal and eBay, and concludes that Paypal is an emerging game changer in financial services likely to dramatically grow revenues. eBay has become a laggard in ecommerce, and will most likely continue to falter.  Predicts Paypal will go up in value, eBay likely will decline &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/1VVq4t5" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/1VVq4t5"&gt;http://onforb.es/1VVq4t5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2015 16:26:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Thinks the Smartphone Is Over. It&amp;#8217;s Wrong</title><link>http://www.wired.com/2015/07/windows-lost-smartphones/#comment-2127296512</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes mag reviewed the last 5 years and concluded that Microsoft was so late with its products, and they were so ineffectual, that it was wholly  unable to create a worthwhile developer network for mobile.  Lateness combined with no new ground-breaking "killer" apps has doomed all the company's mobile efforts (Surface write-offs and weak share) and puts the company in a situation that Nadella has no idea how to turn around - and probably can't. Reliance on old "core" sales of OS (Windows 10) and Office 365 is trying to continue milking the aging cow and will leave the company irrelevant soon enough &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/1TnX8rl" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/1TnX8rl"&gt;http://onforb.es/1TnX8rl&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 16:56:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft slashes 7,800 jobs in phone business, writes off $7.6B Nokia acquisition | Pocketnow</title><link>http://pocketnow.com/2015/07/08/microsoft-slashes-7800-jobs#comment-2127268911</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes makes the clear case that Microsoft has been trending toward irrelevancy for 4 years, and this latest action only reinforces that trend as the company has no game changers for markets where it is a very distant third as its "core" market shrinks &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/1TnX8rl" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/1TnX8rl"&gt;http://onforb.es/1TnX8rl&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 16:42:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft will dismiss 7,800 employees and will write off $ 7.6 billion of assets related to the acquisition of the mobile unit Nokia</title><link>http://www.unlockpwd.com/microsoft-will-dismiss-7800-employees-and-will-write-off-7-6-billion-of-assets-related-to-the-acquisition-of-the-mobile-unit-nokia/#comment-2127230266</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes mag points out that Nadella has no laid off 20% of the Microsoft workforce, and seems to lack any strategy for regaining market relevancy for the aging giant &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/1TnX8rl" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/1TnX8rl"&gt;http://onforb.es/1TnX8rl&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 16:23:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft staff cull expected as firm admits hardware defeat ahead of Windows 10</title><link>http://m.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2416808/microsoft-staff-cull-expected-as-firm-admits-hardware-defeat-ahead-of-windows-10#comment-2127220231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes mag points out that Microsoft has been failing at major projects (Surface, Windows 8) for 4 years.  Nadella has now laid off 20% of the workforce, and shows no strategy for reversing trend toward irrelevancy &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/1TnX8rl" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/1TnX8rl"&gt;http://onforb.es/1TnX8rl&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 16:17:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft announces 7,800 job cuts from phone division, writes off $7.6 billion from Nokia deal</title><link>http://thenextweb.com/microsoft/2015/07/08/oh-no-microsoft/#comment-2127205068</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes mag points out that big things have been going wrong for Microsoft for over 4 years - Surface flop and Windows 8 weakness to name a couple.  This latest action continues the trend toward irrelevancy for the former giant, and there appears no strategy to change the trend &lt;a href="http://onforb.es/1TnX8rl" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onforb.es/1TnX8rl"&gt;http://onforb.es/1TnX8rl&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam_hartung</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 16:09:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>