<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Zanesafrit</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Zanesafrit/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Zanesafrit/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:22:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Good Comments Can Lead to Great Conversations</title><link>http://crm2.typepad.com/brents_blog/2008/07/good-comments-1.html#comment-1850664</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey! The conversation continues! Good to meet here, too. We'll meet in-person soon. I'll connect with you on Twitter. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zanesafrit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:22:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My interview with Zane Safrit</title><link>http://www.communityguy.com/1767/my-interview-with-zane-safrit/#comment-1717547</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank YOU! You shared some great perspectives and real-world advice. It was a delight. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zanesafrit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:16:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Appeasement</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/05/appeasement/#comment-478483</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes. The key is to speak.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The irony of these free-fire accusations from the WH is that their current sec'y of defense encouraged talks with Iran. And their role model, Ronald Reagan, met in person, many times, and TALKED with our then adversary in the Soviet Union, now called Russia. Not only did they want to destroy, they stated that goal many times AND they really do have nukes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But then Nixon met with China's leaders when China was known as Red China. And he spoke with them many times. They too wanted to destroy us.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nixon met with Brexhnez. Ditto desire and means.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kennedy and Eisenhower met with Kruschev who wanted to bury us so bad he slammed his shoe on a table at the UN to empahsize the point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And all these efforts were considered smart, heroic, intelligent, mature, thoughtful, foresightful, insightful. And oh BTW they prevented war with an opponent who could destroy us. Now, by definition of the current WH resident, they'be known as appeasers.  I'd love to see a debate where Eisenhower is called an 'appeaser' of Nixon or Reagan. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zanesafrit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:00:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>