<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for XMarine</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/XMarine/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/XMarine/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:21:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Tata Motors air-powered City Cat car readies for production run</title><link>http://www.newlaunches.com/archives/tata_motors_airpowered_city_cat_car_readies_for_production_run.php#comment-770248</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IF:YOU had done as work AS I HAVE; using "Air"; you would NOT  be so "Enthused" about the "Air Car."  IT Has to Have a SAFE and Heavy Duty Air Storage Tank of sufficient Capacity SAFELY Stored onboard. A Heavy Duty Exhaust System [probably have to be Stainless Steel] And..Very High Pressure Air lines from Tank to Motor, CUSHIONED from "Road Shock"....I think; that if, U could GET 10K out of one, it Would have Many leaks of excaping air...Hisssssssss.... NO WAY!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">XMarine</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:21:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tata Motors air-powered City Cat car readies for production run</title><link>http://www.newlaunches.com/archives/tata_motors_airpowered_city_cat_car_readies_for_production_run.php#comment-770194</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FORGET IT!! NOT FEASABLE! Just another "Idea' that will get Nowhere; except Advertisement for the Manufacturer. [and inventer??] Too many "Delicate" seals/Friction; and, will probably take as much Electricity to "Charge" [pump Up!] as an All Electric Vehicle would, Without All of the Other Complication.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">XMarine</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:09:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>