<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Undine</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Undine/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Undine/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 04:49:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: $2 Billion and Counting</title><link>https://www.spotifyartists.com/2-billion-and-counting/#comment-1689269621</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just have one question, related to transparency. I see in a comment that paid streams are 0.006 and free streams are 0.001. My question is, are all streams (paid vs. free excepted) treated equally? In my mind the ideal model would be sharing the revenue according to streams, so popular frequently played tracks get more. Whereas there's the worry in my mind that there might be "I'm a big artist/label, I can negotiate for a bigger slice of the pie." going on. Which to my mind is harmful to music in general. Same goes for 'exclusives'. I really don't see consumers signing up for every service just so that can get access to all music. An exclusive might sway them to a particular service, but thereby exclude them from anything only available on alternates. Once again, harmful to music in general and only really of benefit to the "big players", not consumers or artists.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SeanJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 04:49:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Schlock Mercenary - What's That Music in the Background?</title><link>http://www.schlockmercenary.com/blog/top-five-music-review-for-writing#comment-1538696906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not a soundtrack, but "Doves - Instrumentals of Rust" is decent concentration music.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SeanJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 04:52:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just for the record</title><link>http://ducttape.etherjammer.com/2009/05/just-for-the-record/#comment-9127701</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've only recently started seriously considering haste. Mostly I've got what I have now based on available upgrades and using stat weightings from places like DwarfPriest. I'm trying to actually understand why the weightings are such and also take stuff like soft caps into account now though and was having trouble getting my head round haste.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SeanJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 10:03:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just for the record</title><link>http://ducttape.etherjammer.com/2009/05/just-for-the-record/#comment-9123249</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you need that much haste?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here's me: &lt;a href="http://eu.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Azjol-Nerub&amp;amp;n=Undine" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://eu.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Azjol-Nerub&amp;amp;n=Undine"&gt;http://eu.wowarmory.com/cha...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By my calculations with my haste, plus the PW:S haste buff and raid buffs I'm not far off the soft cap. Well over it if the Egg proc is included. Unless I've got things wrong.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Where does 433 come from?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SeanJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 05:43:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>