<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Tsark</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Tsark/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Tsark/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:09:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: In defense of the mount changes</title><link>http://ducttape.etherjammer.com/2009/06/in-defense-of-the-mount-changes/#comment-10919532</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As the other commenters wrote - this would be pretty awesome, if there actually was some sort of quest pre-requisite to the mounts. Otherwise, the mount is basically the reward for slaying gorillas (or wolves, or scorpids, or...). Don't get me wrong though - I think it's a good change, but mostly from a gameplay perspective. For it to make sense from a lore perspective, you would have to tie it into too many quest pre-reqs, and Blizz won't do that, because they like the flexibility to level as people prefer. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tsark</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:09:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>