<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ThomRansom</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/ThomRansom/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/ThomRansom/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:33:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: All copywriting should be from an SEO standpoint</title><link>http://talkincblog.com/2009/07/all-copywriting-should-be-from-an-seo-standpoint/#comment-13135620</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Nathan-&lt;br&gt;Picked your blog post off of Twitter and thought I might throw in.&lt;br&gt;It's been my impression that PR and marketing professionals should consider publishing two versions of copy: One SEO optimized and one content-rich, depending on the media they're targeting.  Though media sources are changing preferences from traditional press releases to SMPR's, I wouldn't think you'd want to automatically exclude those that prefer the former.  I'm sure it depends on the type of copy you're writing too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ThomRansom</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:33:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>