<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for TheFounder</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/TheFounder/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/TheFounder/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 02:49:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: There’s Mysteriously Large Amounts of Methane on Mars</title><link>http://nautil.us/blog/theres-mysteriously-large-amounts-of-methane-on-mars#comment-3237243853</link><description>&lt;p&gt; You know there is a lot of scientific evidence to disagree with you, you said there's no evidence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; I would like you to back that up after reviewing AHL 84001.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please explain this then .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allan_Hills_84001#Hypothetical_biogenic_features" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allan_Hills_84001#Hypothetical_biogenic_features"&gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 02:49:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scientists Uncover the Mystery of Tabby's Star » Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!</title><link>https://www.infowars.com/scientists-uncover-the-mystery-of-tabbys-star/#comment-3103353231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a moderator at /r/KIC8462852/ regarding this star.  This article has so many factual problems that I don't even know where to start.    The star is ~1200 light years away based on the last parallax.   Regarding your statement,  it's not radio that we're concerned with.  It's our oxygen in the atmosphere.  Everytime we transit our sun the oxygen and biosigns of our planet make it clear life exists there, and we've been flashing it for 3 billion years... not 1888 .   As for radio .. we don't even know if they use radio.. if it's a they in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:15:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Schafer's bar tabby's star</title><link>http://truegif.com/14060#comment-2807644885</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's my Model!!   I really think it's a giant Gyroscope.&lt;br&gt;-Roger&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:54:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The disappearance of stars could be signs of advanced alien civilitzations</title><link>http://www.ancient-code.com/disappearance-stars-signs-advanced-alien-civilitzations/#comment-2791308598</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's not nothing like Tabby's Star.. it's similar in the regards that Tabby's Star maybe dimming at least over the past century.. which means eventually it may end like this star..  just vanished.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:57:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finally - A Solution to the 'Alien Megastructure' Mystery is On The Way</title><link>http://www.outerplaces.com/science/item/12483-finally-a-solution-to-the-alien-megastructure-mystery-is-on-the-way#comment-2741098008</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It wasn't solved,  not even close.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:21:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Likely Exocomets: Closing-in on 'Alien Megastructure' Clues
</title><link>http://news.discovery.com/space/alien-life-exoplanets/likely-exocomets-closing-in-on-alien-megastructure-clues-160516.htm#comment-2680023517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're most likely right,&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 08:58:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News about mystery star KIC 8462852 | Science Wire | EarthSky</title><link>http://earthsky.org/space/news-about-mystery-star-kic-8462852#comment-2677815140</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your coverage of this star has been very factual, well written and timely.  Though there are a few of us that want it to be something amazing like aliens,  the vast majority of us want to know the truth,  if that's a huge mass of comets or the Romulan Star Empire.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2016 23:25:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News about mystery star KIC 8462852 | Science Wire | EarthSky</title><link>http://earthsky.org/space/news-about-mystery-star-kic-8462852#comment-2668751815</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just don't get how NASA has this huge conference on Kepler.. and ignores Keplers biggest discovery.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 14:44:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google's Gary Illyes: I'm Angry News Sites Don't Link Out, It's Stupid</title><link>http://www.seroundtable.com/google-im-angry-news-sites-don-t-link-out-it-s-stupid-22041.html#comment-2666331096</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He's right... but in the same breath he's talking about Penguin ...  of course he's scarring the daylights out of some of these managers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 09:11:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A New Apple Watch?</title><link>http://www.seroundtable.com/photos/apple-watch-uncovered-22026.html#comment-2658201002</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ok that's funny.  lol&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 13:49:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Actor: Karl Urban In Star Trek Signs: I'm A Doctor, Not An SEO</title><link>http://www.seroundtable.com/photos/karl-urban-dr-leonard-mccoy-star-trek-seo-22019.html#comment-2655677488</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love this!   I am a HUGE trek fan!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 11:10:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Google Penguin 4.0 On World Penguin Day</title><link>http://www.seroundtable.com/world-penguin-day-google-penguin-21985.html#comment-2641856408</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"The only good news is that this Friday is a Jewish holiday where I will be off, so the chances are exponentially higher that Google will release something, since I am offline. ;-)"   HA!   "Barry's on Break...  launch now!"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:17:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Search | DiscoverMagazine.com</title><link>http://sitecore.discovermagazine.com/2016/april/star-search#comment-2637238213</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It has been changing over the past 100 years...  it's dimmed 20%&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 10:57:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google: The Next Penguin Update May Be The Last</title><link>http://www.seroundtable.com/google-last-penguin-update-21975.html#comment-2637041924</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why do I think Penguin went live on April 14th (crazy Mozcast weather report that day) .. and Google is just playing with us.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:50:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google: Footer Content Is Not Penalized But Not Seen As Primary Content</title><link>http://www.seroundtable.com/footer-boilerplate-content-google-21941.html#comment-2625137264</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a serious issue with this.    "If people are using navigation in the footer then it's not supressed" &lt;br&gt;How would they know?  They don't use Analatics data... right?  RIGHT?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 09:44:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Takes Action Against Publishers Who Do Clickjacking</title><link>http://www.seroundtable.com/google-takes-aim-at-clickjacking-21933.html#comment-2623879182</link><description>&lt;p&gt;this has been going on for years...  it's always been against the guidelines to do that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:23:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webmaster See Spike In Google Zombie Traffic</title><link>http://www.seroundtable.com/google-zombie-traffic-continues-increases-21928.html#comment-2623875245</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My condolences.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:21:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webmaster See Spike In Google Zombie Traffic</title><link>http://www.seroundtable.com/google-zombie-traffic-continues-increases-21928.html#comment-2623871032</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It could be referral spam...  I'm not discrediting anything other than the fact that whatever hit that site a few days ago wasn't human visitors.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:19:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webmaster See Spike In Google Zombie Traffic</title><link>http://www.seroundtable.com/google-zombie-traffic-continues-increases-21928.html#comment-2623211134</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks.   I just want to figure out what this is.   It's screwing up the ROI..  it's screwing up usability checks.. It's screwing up a bunch of measurements...   and that guy wanted to inform me that I look "baloney"...  without giving any additional input to the conversation that would help solve it.    I hate people like that.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 08:58:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webmaster See Spike In Google Zombie Traffic</title><link>http://www.seroundtable.com/google-zombie-traffic-continues-increases-21928.html#comment-2623193234</link><description>&lt;p&gt;whatever...  don't care .. what "I look like" ...   it's irrelevant..    do you have anything to add to the zombie issue or no?  If not then baloney is what I would consider your "thoughts on what I look like" /.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 08:45:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webmaster See Spike In Google Zombie Traffic</title><link>http://www.seroundtable.com/google-zombie-traffic-continues-increases-21928.html#comment-2623191940</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yes... inconclusive.   Some however are "similar" but not exact to what the ip was from Googlebot.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 08:44:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webmaster See Spike In Google Zombie Traffic</title><link>http://www.seroundtable.com/google-zombie-traffic-continues-increases-21928.html#comment-2622003241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are looking at it wrong.  You need to zoom in and see it's filtered for Organic traffic only.   I'd have to include how the traffic spiked 100% under "not provided" for the entire duration of the spike... and how the visitors "clicked" from one page to another when no link exists on those pages to the second page.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I compared it with several niche sites in the same industry.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:51:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webmaster See Spike In Google Zombie Traffic</title><link>http://www.seroundtable.com/google-zombie-traffic-continues-increases-21928.html#comment-2621991232</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone that thinks this doesn't exist hasn't had it happen to them ... yet...   I used to think the same way you did Larry until it happened to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:44:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webmaster See Spike In Google Zombie Traffic</title><link>http://www.seroundtable.com/google-zombie-traffic-continues-increases-21928.html#comment-2621944811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is is since Feb 1st... when I go longer the hourly breakdown goes to run into each other for the screenshot.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:19:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webmaster See Spike In Google Zombie Traffic</title><link>http://www.seroundtable.com/google-zombie-traffic-continues-increases-21928.html#comment-2621819869</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps for some people... but as an SEO of 21+ years ... I know phantom traffic.  What I've been seeing is phantom traffic.   I can't nor will I speak for everyone on Webmasterworld.    But 65% spikes in traffic with zero conversions and the "users" clicking from page to page where no link exists ...  that's not just a fluke.    It all came from Google,  all came not provided.. and all came in clicking unlike anything I've seen in decades.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've done work for Walmart,  IBM,  and mostly fortune 500 firms over the course of the years..  You maybe right about people that say "200 pageviews a day"  but normally my clients have several zeros at the end of that figure.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheFounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:10:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>