<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for SpeakToMe</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/SpeakToMe/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/SpeakToMe/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:58:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Trading Analog Dollars For Digital Pennies</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/11/trading-analog/#comment-4064398</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you guys are delusional.  The only way to make money on the internet is through ecommerce.  Keyword search and classified page views receive a $40+ cpm, but that's because they are both closely tied to an ecommerce transaction.  The rest of internet inventory receives less than $1 cpm.  I'm paying $0.055 cpm on my run-of-site advertising over on google adwords.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I see zero hope of this ever changing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:58:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trading Analog Dollars For Digital Pennies</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/11/trading-analog/#comment-4064233</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://stickam.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="stickam.com"&gt;stickam.com&lt;/a&gt; is really, really cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:36:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Case for Derivatives</title><link>http://informationarbitrage.com/post/698405836/the-case-for-derivatives#comment-3678747</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Derivatives allow financial intermediaries to diversify risk.  As such, they have acted to drive down interest rates for borrowers.  If we did away with derivatives, mortgage rates would be in double digits.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:02:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congratulations, Senator. Now the Real Work Begins.</title><link>http://informationarbitrage.com/post/698405635/congratulations-senator-now-the-real-work-begins#comment-3569117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your remedies made me search for "what can the U.S. learn from japan?"  Here are the articles I felt were most interesting, starting with a prescient view of our housing bubble written back in 2006:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.oftwominds.com/blogoct06/japan-bubble.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.oftwominds.com/blogoct06/japan-bubble.html"&gt;http://www.oftwominds.com/b...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94876656" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94876656"&gt;http://www.npr.org/template...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2008-01-21-japan-parallels_N.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2008-01-21-japan-parallels_N.htm"&gt;http://www.usatoday.com/mon...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/columns/commentary/20080924dy03.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/columns/commentary/20080924dy03.htm"&gt;http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:09:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hacking Education</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/11/hacking-educati/#comment-3480545</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have three kids going through middle school and high school here in the US, so I can relate to much of this discussion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do think there is an opportunity in online learning games -- although I would hook them to standardized tests.  The ability to quantify progress must be part of the game, and linking them to a standardized test score would make the value proposition clearer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From what has worked for my family, I would suggest a different path.  I think that the really miraculous leaps in education come from 1-1 interaction between a gifted teacher and a student.  I think that empowering more people to act as tutors in subjects they are familiar with is the way to go. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 08:08:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Entrepreneurs 1 - Patent Trolls 0</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/10/entrepreneurs-1/#comment-3423470</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Its tough standing on the shoulders of giants when one of them can reach up and pop you into his mouth.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:01:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: Monetize the Apps, not the Platform</title><link>http://informationarbitrage.com/post/698405341/twitter-monetize-the-apps-not-the-platform#comment-3391570</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think they need to come up with an app.  The platform itself may never be monetized.  Other open source apps monetize themselves largely through tech support -- no need for that on Twitter, imo.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The app I think they need to create is a Twitter version of Craigslist.  Classifieds are easy to monetize.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:36:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hedge Funds: The Third Quarter Report</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/10/hedge-funds-the/#comment-3390728</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow.  This is an awesome post and self-response.  Really, really good.  Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Edit - I'm trying to find a chart of PCE that shows -3.1% -- can't seem to find it:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;http:// &lt;a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/fredgraph?chart_type=line&amp;amp;s" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/fredgraph?chart_type=line&amp;amp;s"&gt;research.stlouisfed.org/fre...&lt;/a&gt;[1][id]=PCE&amp;amp;s[1][transformation]=ch1&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:52:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some Observations on Quantitative Trading</title><link>http://informationarbitrage.com/post/698405224/some-observations-on-quantitative-trading#comment-3364463</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The move to regulate the derivatives markets will result in new opportunities for quants.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Remember the success of index arb when the stock futures market started trading, or the success of Datek Securities (creators of the Island ECN) and the SOES bandits when online stock trading began.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would love to be among the first to harness a quant system to whatever exchange gets control of the swaps market, for example.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:13:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hedge Funds: The Third Quarter Report</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/10/hedge-funds-the/#comment-3362906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't see the current environment as significantly different than historical precedents.  Of course, I went through the '87 crash, and I was trained by guys who went through severe bear markets in the '70's.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is very difficult to react successfully to market events; rather you need to constantly position your investments so that they are most likely to meet your goals.  After you've had enough failures in foresight, you realize that's the best you can do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Take a step back and look at your goals.  Then, approach the stock market as one tool to achieving the financial aspects of those goals.  Don't let the tail wag the dog.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:51:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Restoring Functioning Markets in a Broken World</title><link>http://informationarbitrage.com/post/698405121#comment-3324900</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree completely with #1 and #2, but I think "#3: Work with laser focus to keep credit-worthy people in their homes" will lead, in practice, to inducing banks to tear up their mortgage contracts with people who either 1) have trouble paying their mortgages or 2) would simply rather not.  That's a lot of people, btw.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the end, pursuing #3 will lead to the unintended consequence of "Banks aren't motivated to lend because they don't see a risk/reward profile that warrants it."  The idea that we will force the banks to lend despite their own rational preference will probably be ineffectual (we can't force then enough) and counter-productive (such loans will inevitably by losers).&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:18:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Citigroup, Merrill and Citadel: Not So Pretty</title><link>http://informationarbitrage.com/post/698404775#comment-3152767</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I basically agree with everything you said.  The one darker element (and as a less public figure than you, perhaps I am better able to bring it up) is the possibility of self-dealing behind Paulson's inconsistency.  I think Gretchen Morgenson's careful delineation of AIG being bailed out while LEH was left to die is kind of like a forward falling in the penalty box after contact with a defender.  Its either a yellow card to the forward for taking a dive or its a penalty kick.  Either Morgenson should be publicly chastised or Paulson should be canned.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:14:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Citigroup, Merrill and Citadel: Not So Pretty</title><link>http://informationarbitrage.com/post/698404775#comment-3150084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I totally agree with your point about mark-to-market.  The problem as I see it is that financial market participants don't know which trading partners they can trust.  The problem is not how to save any individual bank.  Lets treat the disease rather than the symptoms.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To that end, perhaps you could comment upon the "catastrophic error" of letting Lehman go under.  I'm not sure that it was an error, personally.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:55:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Stupidest Answer In The World</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/10/the-stupidest-q/#comment-3149076</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow.  That is absolutely awesome, no lie.  Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:52:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Ying and Yang of Public and Private Markets</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/10/the-ying-and-ya/#comment-3065072</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for an insightful view of private financing right now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think it remains to be seen how financial woes impact underlying fundamentals here on the Internet.  If the 2000 and 2001 experience acts as a guide, I would expect to see deep cuts in online advertising and partnership revenues.  E-commerce revenues, however, may sail through relatively unscathed.  I note that Amazon's revenues in 2001 vs 2000 were up +13%, while Yahoo's revenues were down -35%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:38:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bailouts, Nationalism and Diplomacy</title><link>http://informationarbitrage.com/post/698404730#comment-3058092</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm calling you namby pamby because you believe you can look beyond your tribe and your country to find your fellow prisoners.  That may be unfair.  You may be so wealthy and self-reliant that you actually can look beyond your tribe and country to find the people that have the biggest impact on your well-being.  In my opinion, 95% of americans, and 99% of non-americans, do not have that luxury.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:22:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bailouts, Nationalism and Diplomacy</title><link>http://informationarbitrage.com/post/698404730#comment-3056507</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh man, I can't believe this post.  You point out that economic events will naturally result in increased military spending and posturing from Russia and China -- a brilliant focus, one that I have not heard before -- and then you devolve into some kind of namby pamby malarky about helping each other because the US is powerless to act unilaterally.  I am going to puke.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here's a news flash: we are not all in this thing together.  We are all in this thing for ourselves, our tribes and our countries.  Get it?  Its not our leaders' fault if they act in the best interests of their countries.  That is their job, not their aberration.  I'm going to puke because I'm beginning to think we may be out of the frying pan and into the fire.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:24:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Capital Efficiency Finds It's Moment</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/10/capital-efficie/#comment-2963879</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think its a very healthy thing.  Its making the other elements that a VC can offer -- connections, exposure, etc -- even more important to the startup.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:42:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Capital Efficiency Finds It's Moment</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/10/capital-efficie/#comment-2963300</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That was actually a disappointing read -- I agree with your interpretation of the article, but I'm not sure the author really laser-beamed in on it.  He was talking about all these institutions that were "too big to fail" were simply "too big."  Then he tossed off HUD as a prime example of whale flesh.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If the US government were serious about helping our country, they would focus on cutting costs within their own shop.  They should come up with a plan to lower headcount.  Hey, I'll vote for a reduced military if it is matched by a smaller domestic footprint.  Saying "it ain't going to happen" doesn't cut it.  If our financing costs on $9T in outstanding federal debt start to go up, we'll need to make the tough choices.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:06:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Mental Rorschach</title><link>http://informationarbitrage.com/post/698404576/my-mental-rorschach#comment-2934970</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It sounds like an excellent school.  Its amazing to me how hard it is to be a good teacher.  Kind of like how hard it is to be a good chef at a restaurant.  Its way more difficult than people appreciate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 08:49:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What To Look For Next</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/10/what-to-look-fo/#comment-2916707</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It sounds like the long-term opportunities will be over in China and India, if the analogy to the 1873 panic holds true (ie Europe then is US now, US then is Asia now).  Should we include Brazil and Russia?  Certainly Brazil.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, from the 1873 analogy, one would be better off not dumping a bunch of capital into US-focused businesses.  That panic initiated a four year economic downturn that, among other things, brought the terms bum and tramp into our lexicon -- terms coined for former soldiers who were unemployed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:17:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What To Look For Next</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/10/what-to-look-fo/#comment-2916536</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Regarding Microsoft's outstanding employee-held options -- they had, as of 6/30/08, 517 mm ($12.9 billion) in vested and unvested employee options and employee-held SPSAs.  That's about 6% of outstanding common shares.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's according to their 2008 10k.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:02:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where and How am I Investing in Early-Stage Today?</title><link>http://informationarbitrage.com/post/698404343/where-and-how-am-i-investing-in-early-stage-today#comment-2906871</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, my new company hits on all of these metrics.  The only thing you haven't mentioned is a barrier to entry.  I expect my new market to be massive, and the competitors to swamp us.  I'm just hoping we can be aggressive enough to keep a small piece of the pie.  Actually, that's the only rationale I can see for bringing in outside investors.  They would help us in terms of contacts and stability more than financing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:54:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/10/free-vs-paid.html</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/10/free-vs-paid/#comment-2903039</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're 100% right -- the youth focused web sites are beating the path.  They have dedicated, loyal users and they are figuring out how to monetize them.  My question -- how many kids would pay for a one-on-one interaction with Barney?  Enough to fill Radio City Music Hall, as a I know from experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:17:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/10/free-vs-paid.html</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/10/free-vs-paid/#comment-2902888</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As a startup, you need a CEO and/or CMO who can sell into the big guys.  And it takes a year.  The Enterprise will first try to replicate the product internally.  Then they they will try to get IBM and AT&amp;amp;T to replicate the product (at your cost point).  If they all fail, you'll have a shot.  Simple.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:01:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>