<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for SnarknFury</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/SnarknFury/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/SnarknFury/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:38:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Superhamm?</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/07/superhamm.html#comment-65076921</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I dunno, it'll be hard to shake Hamm's performance as Lex Luthor from my mind... &lt;a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/f26c4046b0/lex-luthor-bailout-with-jon-hamm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/f26c4046b0/lex-luthor-bailout-with-jon-hamm"&gt;http://www.funnyordie.com/v...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But seriously he'd be a fantastic choice along with most of the Mad Men cast in supporting roles. Slattery as Perry White would be perfect.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:38:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Channel 4 get The Event</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/07/channel-4-get-event.html#comment-65046417</link><description>&lt;p&gt;*ahem* Sorry but I couldn't resist.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:40:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Channel 4 get The Event</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/07/channel-4-get-event.html#comment-65046369</link><description>&lt;p&gt;DON'T THINK ABOUT THE EVENT. REMAIN INDOORS.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:40:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Howard The Duck (1986)</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/05/howard-duck-1986.html#comment-50872126</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's nothing wrong with loving a stupid movie. Heck, I have a few stupid favourites myself - &lt;a href="http://snarkandfury.blogspot.com/search/label/stupid%20movies" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://snarkandfury.blogspot.com/search/label/stupid%20movies"&gt;http://snarkandfury.blogspo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I remember seeing Howard the Duck during my teenage years and remember thinking it was a trashy but harmless B movie. Whilst it's not a good film in my opinion, it's certainly not a crime against cinema that critics often decry it as.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 04:37:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No love for Glee and The Pacific?</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/05/no-love-for-glee-and-pacific.html#comment-50692880</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm still watching The Pacific and I do think the show has gotten better toward the end. I guess I haven't had much to add to your reviews so far.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 09:31:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prepare to get Obsessed With TV</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/04/prepare-to-get-obsessed-with-tv.html#comment-47651467</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats, man!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:56:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BBC3 want to take your Pulse</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/04/bbc3-want-to-take-your-pulse.html#comment-47436922</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry but I couldn't help thinking of Garth Marenghi's Darkplace when I read this. It'll make it hard for me to take seriously :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:58:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: THE PACIFIC: Part Two</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/04/pacific-part-two.html#comment-43484014</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, it's a good show but not one that I'm emotionally bonding with. Band of Brothers had very strong characterisation whereas The Pacific seems to be struggling to effectively introduce and establish its protagonists.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:37:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dan's Media Digest is 4 years old today!</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/03/dans-media-digest-is-4-years-old-today.html#comment-40647405</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Happy birthday, keep up the good work!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:54:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talking Point: Who are you people?</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2009/11/talking-point-who-are-you-people.html#comment-24257958</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am a 31 year old human male and I live in your cupboard. Sometimes I steal food from your fridge and clean your house while you're sleeping. You never notice or leave me a thank you note but watching you sleep is all the reward I need. You've run out of milk by the way. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:04:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CHUCK 2.21 - "Chuck Versus The Colonel"</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2009/10/chuck-221-chuck-versus-colonel.html#comment-21248762</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I haven't watched the extras yet but there are some that sound great - Captain Awesome's Guide to Being Awesome and John Casey Presents: So You Want To Be A Deadly Spy?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Awesome!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:59:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CHUCK 2.21 - "Chuck Versus The Colonel"</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2009/10/chuck-221-chuck-versus-colonel.html#comment-21206509</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Dan The Region 2 DVD is already out, I finished watching the series on Monday.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And the finale is pretty darn good.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:02:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CHUCK 2.19 - "Chuck Versus The Dream Job"</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2009/10/chuck-219-chuck-versus-dream-job.html#comment-20037123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah that's true, in this digital age Chuck would become an internet celebrity on YouTube as someone would surely upload a video of the incident!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:48:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CHUCK 2.19 - "Chuck Versus The Dream Job"</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2009/10/chuck-219-chuck-versus-dream-job.html#comment-20032968</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the reason for Chuck not getting a good job was because he felt he couldn't get one after being kicked out of Stanford for cheating and ended up drifting along at the Buy More. That's all changed now that the government gave him a Stanford degree but that does beg the question, why doesn't he now go out and get a better job anyway?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:34:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 1,000,000 hits!</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2009/10/1000000-hits.html#comment-19297810</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations! Or as gamers would put it, 'gratz'.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:57:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Charlie Brooker's Gameswipe</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2009/10/charlie-brookers-gameswipe.html#comment-18306617</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You do know that Charlie used to be a PC games reviewer for PC Zone right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, I would totally watch Adolf Hitler reading the novelisation of Inglorious Basterds on Jackanory. It would be even better than when Rik Mayall read George's Marvellous Medicine.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:05:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Merlin: Series 2 Trailer</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2009/09/merlin-series-2-trailer.html#comment-16230412</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, I thought it was airing on the 12th. Phew, saves me a job this weekend then.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hold on, the Radio Times site has it listed as Saturday 19 September 6:50pm BBC1.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:22:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CHUCK 2.12 - "Chuck Versus The Third Dimension"</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2009/08/chuck-212-chuck-versus-third-dimension.html#comment-15426024</link><description>&lt;p&gt;NFL = National Football League. :)&lt;br&gt;I didn't realise this was a Superbowl week episode, that explains Bettis's presence. He's a retired player who won a Superbowl; not exactly Beckham like in popularity but still pretty famous in NFL circles.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But yeah, he was pretty good considering he's an ex athlete.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:36:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CHUCK 2.12 - "Chuck Versus The Third Dimension"</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2009/08/chuck-212-chuck-versus-third-dimension.html#comment-15416884</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought the golden ticket plot and the assassination plot were going to merge in the finale but it seems the Buy More plot was just there to highlight ex NFL star Jerome Bettis. He put in a decent performance but he didn't get as memorable a role as Michael Strahan did earlier in the season.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:59:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CHUCK 2.11 - "Chuck Versus Santa Claus"</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2009/08/chuck-211-chuck-versus-santa-claus.html#comment-15049241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There were plenty of Die Hard references too, Big Mike's cousin was the cop from that movie - he introduced himself while eating a twinkie, which was what he was shopping for when introduced in Die Hard. I think there were a couple of Die Hard musical cues too, one where the shop was 'locked down' and another when Big Mike and his cousin were reunited.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Die Hard is the greatest Xmas movie ever.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:29:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: State of the Blog: TV anemia, RSS, Blogroll &amp;amp; future</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2009/08/state-of-blog-tv-anemia-rss-blogroll.html#comment-14825594</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love Chuck but never have anything interesting to say in the comments!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:47:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TORCHWOOD: CHILDREN OF EARTH - Day Three</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2009/07/torchwood-children-of-earth-day-three.html#comment-12374295</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Laptops are the only difference between Torchwood and LINDA (from 'Love and Monsters'.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:18:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Has anyone seen Transformers: ROTFLMAO?</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2009/06/has-anyone-seen-transformers-rotflmao.html#comment-11725651</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I read an interesting post today that made a case for the first Batman movie creating the current 'opening weekend' blockbuster box office model.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/scott-mendelson/20-years-later-how-batman_b_220087.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/scott-mendelson/20-years-later-how-batman_b_220087.html"&gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:52:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Has anyone seen Transformers: ROTFLMAO?</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2009/06/has-anyone-seen-transformers-rotflmao.html#comment-11724189</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, it's a pretty disappointing blockbuster year. Star Trek, Drag Me To Hell and Crank 2 (yes, that's right) have been bright spots this year though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:31:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Merlin cast a spell over America?</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2009/06/did-merlin-casts-spell-over-america.html#comment-11722379</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I do get some enjoyment from watching the likes of Merlin &amp;amp; Robin Hood and, as I've said before, I'm glad that the BBC are brave enough to have a go at creating interesting genre shows. In fact, looking at my first episode recap of Merlin, I was quite positive despite my terrible observational humour.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do moan about writing the recaps but that's become a running joke in itself along with my slack attempts at keeping to a schedule.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And if you say I love Demons again, I will kill you so hard...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarknFury</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:50:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>