<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for SarahHorrigan</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/SarahHorrigan/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/SarahHorrigan/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:24:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: ALT-C 2011</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2011/09/alt-c-2011.html#comment-305034144</link><description>&lt;p&gt;F-ALT sounds like a plan to me... have a few contenders in mind...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:24:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can I tell you a secret?</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2011/08/can-i-tell-you-secret.html#comment-279734747</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Andreas - thanks for the comment.  They can overlap, as AJCann says, but I am struggling a bit with remembering who I put in the circles when I'm sharing something and have 'accidentally' shared things with people I didn't necessarily want to.  You could get to circles within circles within circles to manage your sharing - but that's rather cumbersome and again, complex to manage.  So, back on the 'not sure what I make of it' side again for me!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 10:36:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can I tell you a secret?</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2011/08/can-i-tell-you-secret.html#comment-279732723</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They can overlap - but it's seriously difficult to manage them.  I have things I want to discuss with one group, but not another... and remembering who's in what group is so tricky.  Am sure there will be improvements to the circles concept, but I'm still trying to find where it fits in my head at the moment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 10:31:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google + blundering in the dark equals...</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2011/07/google-blundering-in-dark-equals.html#comment-249025371</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you!  Have updated.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:18:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google + blundering in the dark equals...</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2011/07/google-blundering-in-dark-equals.html#comment-249020941</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the distinction between Facebook and Google - I think it has more of a feel of Twitter to me at the mo, i.e. I use that for work-related things rather than personal stuff.  Perhaps Google+ is more a 'Facebook for Twitterers'?  Or maybe it's just one of those things where it is what it needs to be.  Or not at all in many cases, I imagine!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As to numbers of circles - it's the fact that you can't scale or control their size in any way (as yet) which means that less is more in terms of screen real-estate etc.  It also means that whilst you're trying out the way in which it might work for you, it keeps things manageable.  To grow from a small number is easier than to prune from lots.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:14:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Tricks to using the iPod Touch in education</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2009/07/more-tricks-to-using-ipod-touch-in.html#comment-12275345</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess it's a combination of things which makes the iPod Touch a goodie - especially when compared with its meaty (costly!) big brother the iPhone.  The multi-touch screen is really effective, the app store is jam-packed with free goodness (as well as the paid stuff I don't generally touch)... and... hey... it looks purrty!  :o)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, there are other media players out there which can and probably do give it a run for its money... but the combination of wifi, design, features and applications makes the iPod Touch a really strong contender where mobile learning's concerned.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:52:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Things I love about tagging</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2009/07/things-i-love-about-tagging.html#comment-12140407</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Zak... would be really interested to hear more about Yahoo pipes and FriendFeed (am not even attempting to hide my nerdiness this morning!)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;True about misspelling tags being an issue... but that's where getting in to the habit of using unique thematic tags along with whatever other tags seem to fit.  As long as you've got the unique tags nailed, the rest don't matter so much.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:53:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Communities of reciprocity and Twitter</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2009/07/communities-of-reciprocity-and-twitter.html#comment-12068200</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Buying fans" - funny isn't it... you can't buy fans in real life, you have to earn them... so how come they think that buying fans / followers will work now?  Weird!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:55:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The copyright dance and making a video</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2009/06/copyright-dance-and-making-video.html#comment-12068185</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent!  No probs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:54:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The copyright dance and making a video</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2009/06/copyright-dance-and-making-video.html#comment-12068181</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Glad it was helpful, Stuart!  :o)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:54:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VLEs and real learning</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2009/06/vles-and-real-learning.html#comment-12068174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Social:Learn - yes, hybridization of learning environments... think there's an interesting future kicking around there!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:53:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VLEs and real learning</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2009/06/vles-and-real-learning.html#comment-12068170</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agree.  They're not the most inspiring of spaces, are they?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:53:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VLEs and real learning</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2009/06/vles-and-real-learning.html#comment-12068163</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I do get what you're saying, but I also wonder if it's as black and white as that?  I've done a fair few bits of fiddling with the VLE to bring in web 2.0 tools and technologies to improve the experience.  I suppose the fact that it's me who can do this rather than the students is the bit where it is still essentially a TGLE (teacher-guided learning environment) rather than a PLE... but maybe allowing services to integrate a little more would give people the opportunity to be guided towards an effective use of tools rather than just saying 'go, find your own'?  Guided PLEs - is that an option?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:52:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Potted Guide to RSS</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2009/06/potted-guide-to-rss.html#comment-10664489</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yup - no probs!  Am doing a version with audio too... but you're welcome to use, re-use this version.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:29:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Virtual technologies and university involvement</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2009/05/virtual-technologies-and-university.html#comment-9239551</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nah, I've got no issue with informal learning.  I think it's the link with 'pub chatter' which I found a bit jarring.  It's more equivalent to students setting up a study group rather than after hours chit chat.  There's a perception (which I don't know is necessarily Brian's but it was how that particular bit read to me) that what happens outside the classroom is not quite of the 'right' standard and I come across this over and over again.  There is a real lack of value attributed to the power of informal learning.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 07:12:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Virtual technologies and university involvement</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2009/05/virtual-technologies-and-university.html#comment-9238690</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I kinda think it is in lots of respects!  We could at least acknowledge properly that the boundary between various types of learning is less and less meaningful as technology helps make it so.  Education is much less 'in here' or 'out there' anymore.  It's 'wherever'.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 06:02:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Principles for future VLEs?</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2009/05/principles-for-future-vles.html#comment-9214444</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely!  I really like that article, especially "they remain embedded in the classroom paradigm."  Isn't that just so true?  I come across people constantly who are seeking only to replicate the current environment of their teaching and not thinking about what it is the students should be learning and how to get them to that point.  Creativity of design goes out of the window.  A VLE is just one tool.  It's not *the* tool... and yet... reading something like the above, you'd think it was...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:36:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter mysteries and "twetiquette"</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2009/04/twitter-mysteries-and-twetiquette.html#comment-7738087</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks - I'm glad it's not just me has a Twitter-follower-filter!  :o)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 04:49:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter mysteries and "twetiquette"</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2009/04/twitter-mysteries-and-twetiquette.html#comment-7738082</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are certain people I do tend to block if they follow me.  Generally porn or internet marketeers will earn themselves an instant block... and most people get the benefit of the doubt... and I get that not everyone likes to actively participate - but it would be nice if they did, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 04:48:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The beauty of simplicity</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2009/03/beauty-of-simplicity.html#comment-7145581</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gotta love the idea behind that!  Inspired!  :o)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:45:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How do I know if I'm a dinosaur?</title><link>http://scienceoftheinvisible.blogspot.com/2009/03/how-do-i-know-if-im-dinosaur.html#comment-6835231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was just putting together a staff skills audit... I think I may scrap it and use your blog post instead  :o))&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 05:20:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How do I know if I'm a dinosaur?</title><link>http://scienceoftheinvisible.blogspot.com/2009/03/how-do-i-know-if-im-dinosaur.html#comment-6834972</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think we're all dinosaurs... just some of us are geekier dinosaurs than others.  Education is evolving so fast, it's hard to make any kind of statement about where we are right now&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Make a note to yourself to look at this post in one or two years time and see if your dinosaurification system still works.  :o)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:47:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 29 rantable tech phrases</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2009/03/29-rantable-tech-phrases.html#comment-6834889</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm so glad it's not just me that cringes at webinars.  Blurgh, blurgh, blurgh!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As to the 2.0-ification of everything... at least it's not something dull like "Assessment 2.0" or "Library 2.0"  which I heard yesterday!  Adding 2.0 does not make it sparkly fresh, does it!  :o)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:35:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The conundrum of the celebrity Twitterer</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2009/03/conundrum-of-celebrity-twitterer.html#comment-6834873</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow guys - thanks all for the comments.  As I said, it's just one of those things I haven't really got my head around.  I noticed a rash of people joining Twitter when the Stephen Fry - Jonathan Ross TV Twitter thing happened... and since then, they've just as rapidly disappeared.  It set me wondering as to why they bothered... which spilled into... what's the celebrity Twitter thing about.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great to hear all of your perspectives!  Bob - how odd to have been one of the first ones in and then get swamped by all the other followers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sarah (aka Cyber Puritan)  :o))&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:33:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wordle your work</title><link>http://kindalearning.blogspot.com/2009/02/wordle-your-work.html#comment-6620322</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wordling your abstract - now *that* idea has merit!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pure genius.  :o)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SarahHorrigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:56:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>