<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Robquig</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Robquig/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Robquig/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 11:14:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The top newspapers on Twitter? Try this list</title><link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/the-top-newspapers-on-twitter-try-this-list/#comment-180925063</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very cool, Chris. Looking forward to the TV list. Sounds like a big job :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 11:14:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 25 Newspapers on Twitter &amp;#8212; Who&amp;#39;s Up, Who&amp;#39;s Down</title><link>http://staging.thewrap.com/media/column-post/tweet-top-25-newspapers-twitter-26035#comment-178496988</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is this based on print circulation? That might be the reason for the omissions. The @statesman has 32,434 followers...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure I get the logic of keeping track of papers' Twitter accounts using print circulation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:01:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Answer to the Facebook “Like” Button: The “+1”</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/03/30/google-plus-one-button/#comment-175109402</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If they can set it up where you only see your Google friends' +1s, then that would solve the problem. Well, unless you have spammers as friends.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:49:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Answer to the Facebook “Like” Button: The “+1”</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/03/30/google-plus-one-button/#comment-175108636</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is a bit awkward (to rate something before you've seen it). The publishers' plug-in option should help. That way,when you're on a page you truly like, you +1 it and others see it when they search.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:47:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The &amp;#8216;gamification&amp;#8217; of news, and how it can be relevant</title><link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/the-gamification-of-news-and-how-it-can-be-relevant/#comment-166613046</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Aaron. I hear some people saying they didn't get as much out of SXSW this year (something I hear every year). I personally got quite a bit out of it. I, too, am sorry I missed your panel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's plenty of room for innovation in reporting and sharing news, and we're just starting out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:37:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Journalists and SXSW: Why they should go, and what to do there</title><link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/journalists-and-sxsw-why-they-should-go-and-what-to-do-there/#comment-155377310</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No, I do say that it's still worth it, despite the difficulties, and it's also aimed at telling people they should plan early and come next year. Thanks for the comment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:57:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s Official Analytics Product Has Arrived</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/11/17/twitter-analytics/#comment-98591353</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm hoping it shows click counts, and not just for promoted tweets. One of the things I struggle with is knowing exactly how much traffic I'm driving from Twitter. &lt;a href="http://Bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Bit.ly"&gt;Bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; captures well - but only if people use &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; to share our content. A comprehensive measuring of that would be more interesting to me than which tweets caused unfollows, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:34:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Beatles Finally Headed to iTunes  [REPORT]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/11/15/the-beatles-itunes/#comment-97739432</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Haha, I'm clearly older than most people commenting here. The Beatles on iTunes is fantastic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 01:33:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The State of Mobile Video: Porn, Flash and Stalling</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/07/29/mobile-video-study/#comment-65317479</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm wondering the same thing. YouTube videos play fine on an iPhone and an iPad - in mp4 format, which is created when a user uploads a video to YouTube. Since YouTube, the most popular video service, can play on YouTube, not sure how Apple no-flash "marching orders" affect anything.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:56:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Wherever You Go, There You Are.&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://seamuscondron.tumblr.com/post/863892865#comment-64918094</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats!&lt;br&gt;Best of luck at RWW, a publication I highly respect as well. I know you'll do great there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:43:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Should Speak at the Mashable &amp;#038; 92Y Social Good Summit?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/07/27/mashable-92y-social-good-summit-speakers/#comment-64868096</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Two people you should look at from Austin:&lt;br&gt;@daveiam (David Neff) and @michellegreer (Michelle Greer).&lt;br&gt;Both know how to use social media to do social good better than anyone I know.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:19:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Should Speak at the Mashable &amp;#038; 92Y Social Good Summit?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/07/27/mashable-92y-social-good-summit-speakers/#comment-64867951</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Double post (sorry)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:18:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers and location: Going out with Gowalla</title><link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/newspapers-and-location-going-out-with-gowalla/#comment-54817639</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Drew - all great questions that I think will be answered in the coming months/years as this plays out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We are excited about this collaboration, and we think there are a lot of possibilities for future growth.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:15:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Check.in Tries To Rule All Checkins, But Takes Some of the Fun Out of the Game</title><link>http://thenextweb.com/location/2010/03/29/check-in-app-beta-review/#comment-42155872</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wouldn't use the service if it were just to check in. Convenience only goes so far. I use Gowalla for the in-line commenting (which makes it a more social app than Foursquare, imo) and photos. And, yes, I want to see what my friends are up to. I think a lot of people are using more than one service because they're still test-driving them to see which one they'll ultimately choose, not because they want to be checking in just for the sake of checking in. The real potential with these apps are not the games nor the mundane checking in, but the social aspects. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:51:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FourSquare vs. Gowalla at SXSWi 2010: We Have a Winner!</title><link>http://comefortheride.com/foursquare-vs-gowalla-sxswi-2010-we-have-a-winner/#comment-41258453</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You make good points, but I still think the commenting and photos wins out (for now). Also, I like that you actually have to be somewhere to check in to Gowalla. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:30:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FourSquare vs. Gowalla at SXSWi 2010: We Have a Winner!</title><link>http://comefortheride.com/foursquare-vs-gowalla-sxswi-2010-we-have-a-winner/#comment-41257532</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm in Austin - I'm always going somewhere cool ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:23:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FourSquare vs. Gowalla at SXSWi 2010: We Have a Winner!</title><link>http://comefortheride.com/foursquare-vs-gowalla-sxswi-2010-we-have-a-winner/#comment-41251277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice post. I personally like Gowalla, mainly for the in-line commenting on spots and photos (both part of the latest upgrade). Being able to instantly find nearby friends/parties etc. is great when you're at SXSW, but not as important for every-day use. I use Gowalla to socialize/discover new places. It's great for that, and I think that has a bigger long-term benefit. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:39:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Tricks: Live tweeting from the courthouse</title><link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/live-tweeting-from-courthouse/#comment-41210455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stephanie,&lt;br&gt; Thanks! I think we're going to see more courts grapple with social media. It's not quite TV in the courtrooms, but it sure can be close.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:03:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Tricks: How to use Google Buzz for journalism</title><link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/how-to-use-google-buzz-journalism/#comment-34787317</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm hoping someone tells *me* a good way to manage all these accounts. I had Buzz linked to the @Statesman Twitter account but have since unhooked it. It does not seem to be a good use of Buzz to have Tweets flow in there (besides, the lag between Twitter and Buzz is horrible). For now, I recommend just buzzing one or two interesting things a day. The good thing about having Buzz hooked to your e-mail is you see when someone comments on your post so you can go in and reply. If Buzz catches on big time, you can devote more resources to it. For now, I just recommend dabbling in it and experimenting a bit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:49:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Tricks: How to use Google Buzz for journalism</title><link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/how-to-use-google-buzz-journalism/#comment-33973747</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tara - thanks.&lt;br&gt; Be aware that Google is addressing those concerns: &lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10452412-265.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10452412-265.html"&gt;http://news.cnet.com/8301-3...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My advice on all social networks is to be aware of how the privacy settings work.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:57:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New tricks: Journalists and SEO – searching for the right balance</title><link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/new-tricks-journalists-and-seo-%e2%80%93-searching-for-the-right-balance/#comment-32450415</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Monica -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Writing a headline is more than a science - there is some art to it. I think the trick is to write a good SEO-friendly headline and still have it full of intrigue. Although the Statesman mentioned all you need to know in the headline about Cactus Cafe, it still got plenty of clicks. I think on a good story, people will still click through, even if the headline reveals the news.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't think we'd hold back for the sake of getting a click. However, I do think we should be trying to lure the reader in with a catchy, yet still informative headline. At least that should be our goal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for reading, and for the comment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:48:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New tricks: Know your audience &amp;#8211; whether you&amp;#8217;re on Twitter or in print</title><link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/new-tricks-know-your-audience-whether-youre-on-twitter-or-in-print/#comment-32420406</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Vicky &lt;br&gt; Glad it's a help. Thanks for spreading it around.&lt;br&gt; - Robert&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:20:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New tricks: Journalists and SEO – searching for the right balance</title><link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/new-tricks-journalists-and-seo-%e2%80%93-searching-for-the-right-balance/#comment-32417542</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Paul, I really appreciate that.&lt;br&gt;  Kate Morris is a great person to interview :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:46:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Tricks: Create a successful news vertical</title><link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/create-successful-news-vertical/#comment-32324377</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, the ad sales have been brisk, exceeding expectations for a first-year product.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:53:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Tricks: Create a successful news vertical</title><link>http://www.oldmedianewtricks.com/create-successful-news-vertical/#comment-32324339</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks! Glad you stopped by.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Quigley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:52:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>