<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Rick_T</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Rick_T/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Rick_T/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:21:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: JUSTICE GINSBURG FINDS OUT HOW THE RIGHT FEELS WHEN THE LEFT IGNORES THE CONSTITUTION:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/justice_ginsburg_finds_out_how.html#comment-16396141</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think anyone disputes that, least of all me. The dispute here comes with the manner of publishing. He's welcome to print off copies and hand them out on the street corner or mail them to subscribers. He doesn't have a right to have people read them and I don't necessarily think he's entitled constitutionally to distribute his column through multi-billion dollar corporations and their subsidiaries which have hundreds of distribution channels if others don't in the manner Lou outlines above.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:21:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: JUSTICE GINSBURG FINDS OUT HOW THE RIGHT FEELS WHEN THE LEFT IGNORES THE CONSTITUTION:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/justice_ginsburg_finds_out_how.html#comment-16392464</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agree about the non-responsiveness. It's his blog and he can do what he wants. I believe it borders on the disrespectful to have open comments and then just fling verbal poo at the commenters who spend their time reading and posting thoughtful comments. If he doesn't have the time to respond properly, it would just be better to turn off the comments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's a shame. I don't know what his traffic is like these days, but there used to be a lively and numerous group here. I see a number of familiar "faces" on some of the other blogs so I know some of the former commenters are still out there somewhere, just not here. Maybe they've just gotten tired and moved on as I sometimes have.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:56:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: JUSTICE GINSBURG FINDS OUT HOW THE RIGHT FEELS WHEN THE LEFT IGNORES THE CONSTITUTION:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/justice_ginsburg_finds_out_how.html#comment-16388957</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your clear and detailed response. I agree with most of it and I think I might agree with you about press organizations except for the size of some of them. Clear Channel owns 900 radio stations. Gannett owns about the same number of daily and non-daily newspapers. I believe that is waaaay too much concentration.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:39:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: JUSTICE GINSBURG FINDS OUT HOW THE RIGHT FEELS WHEN THE LEFT IGNORES THE CONSTITUTION:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/justice_ginsburg_finds_out_how.html#comment-16361309</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No offense, but you might be late to the conversation here. I'm not a lawyer but OJ states that corporates have absolutely no right of free speech because they are not persons. I'd like to know why a corporation such as GE can essentially have free speech through subsidiary corporations such as NBC - conflict over energy reporting? - but as Lou points out I can't band together with other like minded citizens under a 501(c4) or PAC and have the same. My point is that I have no problem one way or the other as long as both are on the same footing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And spare me any arguments regarding an objective free press yada, yada.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:43:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: JUSTICE GINSBURG FINDS OUT HOW THE RIGHT FEELS WHEN THE LEFT IGNORES THE CONSTITUTION:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/justice_ginsburg_finds_out_how.html#comment-16320547</link><description>&lt;p&gt;See, I read this:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"People form corporations in order to avoid responsibilities." by our host and I wonder why media CORPORATIONS are not held to the same standard.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:39:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: JUSTICE GINSBURG FINDS OUT HOW THE RIGHT FEELS WHEN THE LEFT IGNORES THE CONSTITUTION:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/justice_ginsburg_finds_out_how.html#comment-16317118</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have absolutely no idea how that is supposed to be responsive to my comment regarding corporations in the media. Maybe you placed it in the wrong place. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:36:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: JUSTICE GINSBURG FINDS OUT HOW THE RIGHT FEELS WHEN THE LEFT IGNORES THE CONSTITUTION:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/justice_ginsburg_finds_out_how.html#comment-16314129</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd be happy to restrict free speech of corporations if it also applies to CBS, NYT, and the rest of the mainstream media. Katie Couric, Paul Krugman, et al would be welcome to stand on the street corners and shout or hand out newsletters with all the rest of us.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:37:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: HERE'S AN IDEA... (via &lt;a href=http://pajamasmedia.com/eddriscoll/&gt;Ed Driscoll&lt;/a&gt;):</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/heres_an_idea_via_ed_driscoll.html#comment-16247744</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you understand the logic behind an "If...then" statement and the meaning of "you" versus "I?"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:41:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: HERE'S AN IDEA... (via &lt;a href=http://pajamasmedia.com/eddriscoll/&gt;Ed Driscoll&lt;/a&gt;):</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/heres_an_idea_via_ed_driscoll.html#comment-16206284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If your doctor won't tell you that you don't need treatment, then you really need to find yourself another doctor.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:39:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: WHAT PART OF THIS DO THEY NOT GET?:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/what_part_of_this_do_they_not.html#comment-16204898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting. Almost 1.3m have signed this one for just the opposite.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.freeourhealthcarenow.com/form.php" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.freeourhealthcarenow.com/form.php"&gt;http://www.freeourhealthcar...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:22:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/its_luther_lives_in_dallas.html</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/its_luther_lives_in_dallas.html#comment-16119157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What does Al-Luther say about a woman drinking a beer while wearing pants?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 19:11:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: THE ONE THING ARIEL SHARON KNEW THEY HAD TO AVOID:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/the_one_thing_ariel_sharon_kne.html#comment-16055011</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How's being a minority population worked out so far for Jews in Middle Eastern countries?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 10:07:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: IT'S PARTICULARLY USEFUL HERE...:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/its_particularly_useful_here.html#comment-15904996</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Probably so. I was responding to OJ's point regarding relative wealth and power. We can't know but I bet the pronouncements of Caesar were disregarded with much greater peril than the (modern) Pope's. Agreed?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:30:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: IT'S PARTICULARLY USEFUL HERE...:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/its_particularly_useful_here.html#comment-15903556</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A perfect example of my comment downstream about the many things I read here not even being wrong.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Berlusconi is barely in the top 100 richest people in the world and he can't seem to rid himself of pesky Italian prosecutors. Lou can probably give you a better estimate of the force projection of the Italian army and navy but it probably doesn't strike fear into much of anybody.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Catholic Church has wealth but it should have after hoarding it for 20 centuries. What power does the Pope have? Even Catholic Democratic politicians here in the States neither obey nor fear him.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:04:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: BUT...BUT...BUT...:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/butbutbut_1.html#comment-15898940</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Many of those of a certain age are no doubt the last beneficiaries of that extinct dodo of a benefit, the defined benefit pension plan. Younger ones are likely recipients of generous government pensions. Virtually none of us in the private sector will be so fortunate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:19:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: SILLY STRING:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/silly_string.html#comment-15898727</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"It's not right. It's not even wrong."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boy if I had a nickel for every time thinking that after reading something on this blog...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:15:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: IT'S PARTICULARLY USEFUL HERE...:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/its_particularly_useful_here.html#comment-15898588</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, the Roman empire lasted in name for 1,400 years. But what would Caesar Augustus have thought of the Roman empire of Justinian? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:13:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: OH, CHASMA...  (via Christopher Gatto)</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/oh_chasma_via_christopher_gatt.html#comment-15843599</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ontario is sending patients to DETROIT(!!), for heaven's sake:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Last year, Henry Ford worked out a deal with Hotel Dieu Grace Hospital in Windsor to be its backup for emergency heart procedures such as angioplasty or bypass surgery, said Dr. Aaron Kugelmass, director of cardiac catheterization services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Spokesperson Ilene Wolf said Beaumont Hospital in January began offering Canadians bariatric surgery through an agreement with the Ontario Ministry of Health."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20080418/BRIGHTSIDE/577130486#" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20080418/BRIGHTSIDE/577130486#"&gt;http://www.crainsdetroit.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:40:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/as_they_said_of_mj_at_unc.html</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/as_they_said_of_mj_at_unc.html#comment-15843390</link><description>&lt;p&gt;....and Dan Dakich&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Exactly 25 years later, the facts haven’t changed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Michael Jordan scored 13 points. He fouled out after playing just 26 minutes. He missed eight of his 14 field goal attempts. His college career ended with a 72-68 loss to Indiana in the NCAA Tournament regional semifinal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Legend of Dan Dakich, however, has grown from that of a role player who threw up after learning he would guard Jordan to the only man living who shut him down."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.indy.com/posts/dan-dakich-s-two-hours-of-fame-have-lasted-25-years" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.indy.com/posts/dan-dakich-s-two-hours-of-fame-have-lasted-25-years"&gt;http://www.indy.com/posts/d...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:35:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: IF YOU THINK HIS SAWYER OBSESSION IS ODD...:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/if_you_think_his_sawyer_obsess.html#comment-15843180</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I crank the radio up in the morning to avoid hearing her voice on GMA:  it oozes smarminess and forced geniality. I can't imagine what it's going to sound like on the news.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:31:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/thanks_w_22.html</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/thanks_w_22.html#comment-15735041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Early money is the easiest. It's like declaring your receivables 100% collectible after your best customers have paid on time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:17:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: HOW'S THAT INTERNET THING WORKING OUT FOR YOU?:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/09/hows_that_internet_thing_worki.html#comment-15734561</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I always thought that he'd rather be popular with the cool liberal in crowd at the NYT than right (no pun intended).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:04:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: HERE'S A CONTEST FOR YOU...:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/08/heres_a_contest_for_you.html#comment-15678414</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems he doesn't have much choice. As of last week:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Of more than 500 senior policymaking positions requiring Senate confirmation, just 43 percent have been filled..."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/24/us/politics/24confirm.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/24/us/politics/24confirm.html"&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:03:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: HERE'S A CONTEST FOR YOU...:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/08/heres_a_contest_for_you.html#comment-15678293</link><description>&lt;p&gt;+1 to what Bruno said.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:00:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: WALLY'S GOTTA BEEF:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2009/08/wallys_gotta_beef.html#comment-15678245</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Doesn't this make him unelectable, among other adjectives you ascribe to others which hold this position?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Gov. Tim Pawlenty is renewing his call to crack down on illegal immigration in Minnesota. The governor's plan includes some initiatives that don't need legislative approval and some that do...If you have a country that's based on the rule of law and the rule of law gets knowingly cast aside and we allow illegal behavior to continue then the rule of law is diminished and one of the cornerstones of our country gets eroded in a pretty pronounced way," he said."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2008/01/07/immigration/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2008/01/07/immigration/"&gt;http://minnesota.publicradi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick_T</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:58:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>