Disqus - Latest Comments for RandomAccuracy

Re: Quote Of The Day

RandomAccuracy — Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:59:54 -0000

I'm curious to when in human history, we had more respect for life than now?

I think this is a case of pining for the old times, when the old times were either no different or worse than now.

Re: Haley Barbour Backs Bob McDonnell

RandomAccuracy — Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:06:32 -0000

Meh, to those who support it, it's a symbol of anti "big" government. To those who do not, it's a symbol of slavery.

I think it's absolutely stupid to use a symbol that is so mixed in interpretation. I think Amradorn has a good point.

I don't see where the pity is for this though, the southern states burned the confederate flag image into the mind of our parents when using it as a symbol against the civil rights movement... they did it to themselves.

Re: That Bill That Passed

RandomAccuracy — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:50:05 -0000

Glad something he promised while campaigning was seen through.
Time will tell if our economy was ready for it.

I'm sure Glen Beck would have cried no matter what the outcome.

Re: Andre Bauer: How Not To Win An Election

RandomAccuracy — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:05:20 -0000

Worst summarization of the novel "Ishmael".... ever.
:)

Re: SHOCKING: Sarah Palin Heading To Fox News

RandomAccuracy — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:02:36 -0000

She seriously quite her job as a public servant to become a news commentator?

What a very presidential move for her.

Re: Christmas Goodies

RandomAccuracy — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:43:12 -0000

Perhaps you should ask Santa Claus for her album this year :)
http://www.mergerecords.com...

Re: Quote Of The Day

RandomAccuracy — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:38:25 -0000

Almost sounds like Norris is suggesting he would be against giving health insurance to his lord's mother.

Pretty much the general religious arguement against abortion... Norris just threw "Obamacare" in the qoute disregarding EVERY presidents policies since Row vs. Wade.

I love when people make the assumption Mary would have rather had an abortion then birthed their God. I like to think they are projecting their own thoughts on the situation had it been them and are really closet pro-choice advocates. I mean come on, if you believe the tale you'd think being visited by an angel to tell her she was carrying a God would have made up her mind.

Re: Sarah Palin Likes Barack Obama

RandomAccuracy — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:55:16 -0000

perhaps suggesting that Obama read Palin's book and decided paraphrase it for the speech.

Re: More Tiger Backlash

RandomAccuracy — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:26:34 -0000

I agree with you guys to a point... his affairs have nothing to do with his golfing or breaking the barriers of the sport. He deserves the recognition and award.

That said, Politically I agree with Baca's actions. His statement is that he won't pursue the legislation this session.

If he proposed legislation to condemn Tiger, I'd feel he was going to far.

If he kept the legislation on track, we all know there are a couple radio blowhards that would dedicate their show and point there 3 million strong lackeys in the direction of Baca and his wanting to "honor an adulterer".

If he waits for the family matters work themselves out and then proposes the honor, the award would go to Tiger as deserved and not with the truckload of politics in tow.

Sounds to me like Baca is saying "Bad Timing" here, and that's why I agree with it.

Re: Auto-Tuning Carl Sagan

RandomAccuracy — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:11:34 -0000

this and the Slap Chop Rap are what the internet was made for (in my opinion)

Re: Shocker: Sarah Palin Wants To Profile Muslims

RandomAccuracy — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:10:26 -0000

She truly speaks for a segment of the US population that just isn't represented in congress nowadays.... unfortunetly, that segment of the population are crazy, paranoid dickweeds.

Re: Science Fair Double-Fail

RandomAccuracy — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:28:14 -0000

not to be a party pooper, but I smell photoshop madness on most of those (at BuzzFeed). Except that Crystal Meth "friend or foe" one... it's about time someone pointed out the increased profits for denture manufacturing.

Re: Fort Hood Is Proof For More Muslim Soldiers

RandomAccuracy — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:34:15 -0000

ummm..... you're on AOL? :P

I think admitting that is going "too far".

Re: Hard Wuerk

RandomAccuracy — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:51:15 -0000

I don't know Freemon If you're going on the idea that thinking emotionally vs thinking rationally is the defining skill in making someone better at governing or navigating life, by your theory anyone that lets the faith of their religion decide their policies is flawed.

Keeping in mind that by definition faith is based in irrational and emotional thought (and illogical) then the conservative religious movement is actually the one that can't possibly govern with a logical steady head.

I'm not even going to touch the male chauvinistic undertones of your comment.

I'm with PJ, your comment doesn't seem to relate to anything regarding this post. I'm also curious on what you are commenting on?

Re: GOP 2010: Ahead Of The Democrats

RandomAccuracy — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:27:38 -0000

yep, I'm sure it will come down to which side of the aisle screws up the most up to then.

Re: Support For Public Option At Its Highest

RandomAccuracy — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:42:27 -0000

yeah, I don't quite understand the majority response to that second question...

"Is it important to give people a choice of a public option?"

it doesn't read deceptive.

It could be coming from people who are ok with the gov't running a general health care program but not ok with them forcing everyone to be on health care (public or private).

Re: More Religious Debate

RandomAccuracy — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:38:16 -0000

I think I was right on my first guess as that's what they've spelled out on their website:
http://newyorkcity.unitedco...

Re: More Religious Debate

RandomAccuracy — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:35:48 -0000

Why proselytism atheism... building a larger group of like-minded people for political or social gain, probably.

If you're looking for a more moral but less plausible reason:

Some people like to push an anti-religion agenda in the same way someone would push the anti-psychic agenda.

To them, psychic powers are just hogwash, and believers are only likely to get hurt, scammed, etc... psychics prey on people in weak moments and feed them falsehoods while siphoning the victims money promising them special insight or a better future.

As a religious example, you can see this same behavior in the most vocal televangelists.

Just cause you don't believe in a God doesn't mean you don't care that others are being taken advantage of.

Re: More Religious Debate

RandomAccuracy — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:08:19 -0000

Yeah, Hannity didn't even bother to research it. I'm guessing that was just a off the cuff, gotcha.

At any rate if religious groups can buy advertisement space to display their beliefs, I don't see why atheist groups can't. It's not like they are specifically digging at one religion.

Re: The Right America, Religious Edition

RandomAccuracy — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:43:21 -0000

well put

Re: The Right America, Religious Edition

RandomAccuracy — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:27:18 -0000

Which, fury, they did decide. In this case, there was no court involved. The school took it upon itself to remove the banner even though there was no pressure from courts, gov't or parents. The pressure present was that of the risk that there could be an angry parent in the future.

Now the question is, if there was an angry Buddhist parent at the game asking for the banner not to be used, would it be right to remove the banner regardless of the majority Christian presence?

Re: The Right America, Religious Edition

RandomAccuracy — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:41:58 -0000

Hmm... kids aren't being taught evolution because they can't be taught God in school. They are taught evolution because it's a science and it's being taught in science classes. If you believe that evolution is in danger of taking away your religion, I'd be more worried about your lack of faith then anything else.

I'm with Vast... when Conservatives complain about religion, it's rarely about religious freedom and almost always about Christian indoctrination. The ones that fight the hardest on ID theory aren't looking to add alternative scientific theories on life's beginning, they are trying to push a more and more watered down version of their creation story on the public which has been going on for the last 100 years or so.

Kids have been "firing guns at one another" since guns were invented, a bit lofty to say that violence has gone up because we're becoming Godless since violent crimes at schools have actually gone down in the last 2 decades.

As far as that football article goes, "The signs and messages from those in the stands are acceptable because they're viewed as personal expressions of faith." Isn't this what you are arguing for? What are you complaining about, your freedom to express your religion is still intact.

I would never want to see those same football players go through a banner that says "God does not exist" even if it does agree with my beliefs, but you are basically arguing that it's ok for the students and school to do so.

Re: Department Of 'Did He Really Just Say That?'

RandomAccuracy — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:49:11 -0000

yep...and the criticism has nothing to do with the Bachmann appearing batshit crazy half the time she opens her mouth.

Re: Making The Bible More Conservative

RandomAccuracy — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:52:49 -0000

Leave it to Conservapedia to think a bible translation made specifically for the ideals of a 17th century monarchy has the least amount of translation bias.

Re: Meet The A-Team

RandomAccuracy — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:59:51 -0000

ugh.
The sequels I can excuse, but geez.

On a side note, I hope Rob Zombie takes the reins for the Short Circuit remake.