<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for RJN</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/RJN/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/RJN/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:25:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Editorial: Xbox 360 And PS3 Future Proof Status For 2010-2011</title><link>http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Editorial-Xbox-360-And-PS3-Future-Proof-Status-For-2010-2011-19903.html#comment-17242814</link><description>&lt;p&gt;just adding to that last comment. Developers develop for the 360 because they feel it is easier and quicker, which means money quicker. When you look at ps3 games which are lovingly crafted using the sony development tools there is an actual difference and you cannot deny it. Just go ahead and tell me that, Any game on the 360 looks better than heavy rain, uncharted 2 or GT5, I dare ya. And if you do, you know that you are lying because there is a reason they are ps3 exclusives, because the developers care about what they are making and want a beautiful polished game that shows they haven't just reskinned old games, Gears im looking at you and you Halo. Some 360 developers try to innovate but the only reason they do is because MS is spunking money into their gaping ass holes (lionhead, Epic, bungie)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RJN</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:25:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Editorial: Xbox 360 And PS3 Future Proof Status For 2010-2011</title><link>http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Editorial-Xbox-360-And-PS3-Future-Proof-Status-For-2010-2011-19903.html#comment-17242464</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uncharted 2, GT5, GOW3 or The last guardian, you have played these games? do you work for sony? maybe gow3 but i think you're lying, plus im going to get to play gow3 and MAG in october so ill tell you then eh.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RJN</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:18:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Editorial: Xbox 360 And PS3 Future Proof Status For 2010-2011</title><link>http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Editorial-Xbox-360-And-PS3-Future-Proof-Status-For-2010-2011-19903.html#comment-17242347</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, let me retaliate. The 360 may have 1080p, but do any games make use of it? please tell me cause i seriously doubt many of them do, i do acknowledge that sony doesn't have many 1080p games but they are slowly coming through as developers realise they need to put more effort into their games. You say you can download full 360 games,well I have seen this i do read articles and i noted that they were charging full RRP for mass effect and the like and over 3x that in AU which is pretty poor from MS. More players on ODST than killzone 2. Ye ok it will, there are more LIVE players than PSN players and don't forget this is bungies 3rd multiplayer game (unless halo had it which i think it did) so theyve had a bit of practice while kz2 is GG 1st MP title. You side swipe my comment about natal, when you in your previous post say it will be revolutionary, then tell me that we cant really say anything about it cos its too far off. I don't really how the 'ps3 is guilty of 250gb' comment is relevant to my argument. But you then say that bigger HDs will come, yes they probably will. But sony has already allowed PS3 owners to have hard drives 4x times as big as 360 owners. And having a quick look on &lt;a href="http://play.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="play.com"&gt;play.com&lt;/a&gt; you can see that a 120gb 360 HDD is 89.99 while a 2.5" sata ps3 compatible 320gb western digital HDD is only 49.99 or 500gb for 59.99 so i think MS is beaten there mate. Then onto wifi, i didnt say sony have integrated it I just said they could do. And how much do you think a new dongle will set you back, im betting it won't replave the original so i'm saying £75, which is really not worth paying. I await your idiotic response telling me i'm wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RJN</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:15:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sony confirm lineup for Eurogamer Expo</title><link>http://www.thelostgamer.com/2009/09/22/sony-confirm-lineup-for-eurogamer-expo/#comment-17224662</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think i may have to go to this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RJN</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:50:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Editorial: Xbox 360 And PS3 Future Proof Status For 2010-2011</title><link>http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Editorial-Xbox-360-And-PS3-Future-Proof-Status-For-2010-2011-19903.html#comment-16927366</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, could be more of a fanboy. Lets start off with 'Both consoles have full HD' 360 doesn;t it doesn't support 1080p which the ps3 does. And ports are starting to even out on ps3, and they are only better because they were developed for the 360 first.. You say that PS3 exclusives dont look any better than 360 ones. You have obviously never laid eyes on games like Killzone 2, Uncharted 2, GT5, GOW3 or The last guardian, which all pretty much beat the paltry 640p that ODST is offering. You then side swipe the fact that storage is a red herring, when all self respecting gamers know they dont want to have to swap dics when moving to a new area in FFXIII which MS ruined for ps3 owners btw.  THEEEN you mention that the 360 has natal, which will be as "revolutionary as the wiimote". But you fail to recognise that the wii is basically a machine that runs wii fit and gets shovelware dumped on it. Without a controller this can only get worse, because i know that i don't want to be playing 3d breakout. But the SMC (sony motion controller) has 1:1 motion tracking much better than the wii has. Plus sony are ready to back the controller with more hardcore games than bs shovelware. Then you talk about the increased HDD sizes which as far as I am aware is just with the new MW2 bundles and Forza 3 which have 250GB HDD which cant be bought seperately, totally ignoring the fact ps3 has swappable HDD capability allowing it to have 720gb HDD if you so wish. Then the wifi which is bumped up to 'N' which really should have been there from the start since it costs extra, but that ain't really futureproofing sony could integrate that into their consoles if they really wanted to.  Then the moving away from physical media. WRONG. if you think we are going to be downloading full games anytime soon you are sadly mistaken. Maybe in korea where they have 1GBPS connections, but here in the UK its 2.4mbps AVERAGE with even slower download speeds (512kbps) which means it would take approx 266 hours to dwonload an 8gb game. so until the worlds broadband infrastructure is up to scratch were gonna be using discs my friend. My last point, the 360 has the 'lead' but if you do the math PS3 has sold more each year, but because the 360 has a head start it has sold more, no shit sherlock and if you think that streaming a few movies through netflix means that the distribution of physical media will stop you are a total and utter noob.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RJN</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:42:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Happy Comic-Con [NSFW-ish]</title><link>http://www.phillyd.tv/2009/07/23/happy-comic-con-nsfw-ish/#comment-13693597</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wheres the girl in the green leotard, she had a nice ass.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RJN</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:32:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>