<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Plankton</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Plankton/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Plankton/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:47:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 5 Reasons Why E-Books Aren&amp;#8217;t There Yet</title><link>http://www.wired.com/business/2011/06/ebooks-not-there-yet/#comment-226326818</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If anything, you are FAILING to state the obvious - your library scenario is irrelevant because clearly the social worker would take that into consideration.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:47:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://wearethreadbare.tumblr.com/post/5704368996</title><link>http://wearethreadbare.tumblr.com/post/5704368996#comment-209116902</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Well now I have a massive craving for graph paper.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 17:19:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Revealed: the 29 anti-reform MPs who would lose their seats under the AV system</title><link>http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/av/revealed-the-29-antireform-mps-who-would-lose-their-seats-under-the-av-system-2277683.html#comment-195786797</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"logical really, if you can't win with the present system change it"&lt;br&gt;- and equally, in the case of labour and conservatives, if you have duopoly control over the current system (despite national preferences implying otherwise), don't change it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Nothing high princilped, nothing exceptionally correct, nothing morally more acceptable."&lt;br&gt;Just because it aligns with their personal interests does not mean it might not reflect better principles. Otherwise neither the Yes or No vote could be the better principle because the Conservatives are backing No out of self interest!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You admit that FPTP isn't the best. Then you say it's got to be better than changing anything. This makes no sense. If it's not the best, then the right change should improve the system.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 11:38:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://wearethreadbare.tumblr.com/post/3988191719</title><link>http://wearethreadbare.tumblr.com/post/3988191719#comment-168748057</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Venetian Snares version succeeds in simultaneously being one of the most incredible and inappropriate remixes of all time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:44:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://wearethreadbare.tumblr.com/post/3923654678</title><link>http://wearethreadbare.tumblr.com/post/3923654678#comment-167267353</link><description>&lt;p&gt;His other covers don't seem to attempt much beyond a watered-down straight shot at their respective originals, but this one is surprisingly good... and needless to say, the original Sharon Van Etten track is ohmygodfantastic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;She pops up on the new National, by the way:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://soundcloud.com/weallwantsome1/the-national-think-you-can" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://soundcloud.com/weallwantsome1/the-national-think-you-can"&gt;http://soundcloud.com/weall...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:14:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: March 2011: Having Faith / Losing Faith</title><link>http://wearethreadbare.tumblr.com/post/3626526962#comment-164844533</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...not quite sure how to feel about that Japanese wave pool comment with the benefit of hindsight.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 17:18:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dustin O&amp;rsquo;Halloran &amp;mdash; Lumiere</title><link>http://blog.adrianoesteves.com/post/3412737373#comment-153323704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow. This is exactly what I need right now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:54:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Articles - Squillaci: My best years are yet to come</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/arsenalmania/articles_squillaci_my_best_years_are_yet_to_come/#comment-80925998</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Such an obvious attempt to wind people up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:59:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Album Review: CocoRosie &amp;#8211; Grey Oceans</title><link>http://beatsperminute.com/2010/05/12/album-review-cocorosie-grey-oceans/#comment-49906017</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very good review mate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Personally I'm not the biggest fan of this record, but it certainly has it's moments.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 11:25:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Articles - Footprints</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/arsenalmania/articles_footprints/#comment-48187670</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"It's funny that we're about to- bizarre series of results notwithstanding- finish third, with a higher points total than last season and yet, looking across the team it's difficult to pinpoint outstanding improvement within the team- apart from the ones I've alluded to above."&lt;br&gt;I think the outstanding emergence of Song, Vermaelen and Fabregas, plus the lesser but still accountable improvements of Eboue, Diaby, Denilson, Van Persie, Bendtner, Ramsey, Clichy (compared to last year) and the late addition of Campbell are plenty to account for the points difference this season. That and there is a definite improvement in mentality against lower sides. It doesn't seem like much of a mystery to me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Apart from Almunia and Eduardo, no-one significant has fallen back this year. As for Eduardo, I find it curious that people blame his injury for his loss of form, but when he came back, his finishing was very confident. No, the real turning point is the dive incident vs Celtic. Since being put under the magnifying glass his cool demeanour and mentality has been lost.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 13:13:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Articles - Did he really say that?</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/arsenalmania/articles_did_he_really_say_that/#comment-47926742</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's no point of comparing these managers unless you can figure out what they would do at Arsenal. We are in a financially unique position. In the long-term, we stand to be one of the healthiest clubs, but in the mean time, we need to look after the cash. Name another club in a comparable position. Man Utd and Bayern certainly are not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A better way to compare manager's ideologies, then, is to look at the way Wenger managed before the temporary financial constraints that the Emirates investment has brought. And before the Emirates, no one sought to accuse Wenger of not caring about trophies; in fact, he seemed rather good at it. His philosophy is no different today. He is trying to protect the long-term destiny of the club, and right now, that means a certain frugality.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wenger wants to win trophies, don't let anyone tell you otherwise. But really, the best way to guarantee as much success (winning competitions, leagues) for the club as possible involves looking out for the future. There is nothing "fishy" about this philosophy. The logic is so blatantly obvious, but it appears that "supporters" find it difficult to grasp because it isn't exactly common amongst other clubs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 17:03:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Articles - Did he really say that?</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/arsenalmania/articles_did_he_really_say_that/#comment-47926201</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I imagine a transfer fee was on the table, Fulham asked Hangeland if he would consider it, and he said no, at which points further transfer talks were pointless.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 16:57:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Articles - Did he really say that?</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/arsenalmania/articles_did_he_really_say_that/#comment-47886544</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let's make something clear; he didn't stay at Fulham over Arsenal for trophies. He stayed there because he is attached to the club, he gets on well with the management, he doesn't want to be a mercenary etc. So let's not turn this into what it's not; he is justifying the decision, in hindsight, on the basis of the Europa Cup final - but this is a bolt out of the blue, and not representative of why he didn't move in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I find it entirely arrogant of us to assume that all players should want to move to us, but equally arrogant of Utd or Barca to say the same thing. It doesn't mean we're doing something wrong when a player rejects us. Some players would just rather stay at the club they're at - see Le Tissier, Shearer. And let's not forget that our philosophy brings players to the club too, see Arshavin and Ramsey, for instance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I know you saw the interview and got a little excited that this was a chance to have a go at Wenger's philosophy, but you are so way off the mark here. And, for the record, Wenger doesn't prefer money over trophies. He prefers two trophies over one. There's no point in blowing the LONG TERM STABILITY of the club (read: many trophies indefinitely into the future) for short term gains (read: one or two trophies now). This common misconception is an embarrassment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 13:50:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Album Review: Dry the River  &amp;#8211; Bible Belt EP</title><link>http://beatsperminute.com/2010/04/20/album-review-dry-the-river%e2%80%a8-bible-belt-ep/#comment-46536447</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Best EP I've heard this year, I get the feeling the reviewer is missing something significant here. The drums are NOT mixed too low, the chorus of Weights &amp;amp; Measures DOES NOT fall short, and these tracks are not "restrained" - they're just well crafted!&lt;br&gt;You also seem rather keen to dig up some deep contextual family based meaning to it all, which is perhaps why you're missing the point. This isn't a complex, concept EP. It's just a band in a very creative, exciting space, sharing it with whoever wants to listen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:45:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Plankton: Bob Dylan Christmas Q&amp;amp;A session</title><link>http://monktonvsplankton.tumblr.com/post/246336044#comment-23774051</link><description>&lt;p&gt;- this is devastating news to hear. The world was a far happier place when this was a self-penned Dylan classic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:56:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Plankton: Reconstructing Radiohead</title><link>http://monktonvsplankton.tumblr.com/post/237404830#comment-22704534</link><description>&lt;p&gt;- with his vocals instead, though. He's got a very good voice of course, but it's not quite the same sensation as hearing Thom sing. Definitely worth attention, though: &lt;a href="http://www.devilhood.com/songs/mixes/bigbootspoison-vocal.mp3" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.devilhood.com/songs/mixes/bigbootspoison-vocal.mp3"&gt;http://www.devilhood.com/so...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:01:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Plankton: Happy Birthday</title><link>http://monktonvsplankton.tumblr.com/post/222694415#comment-22261298</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know Jens Lekman well enough to give a comprehensive defense, but I really do think he belongs here. What about 'A Postcard To Nina'? He's not the greatest lyricist in the classical sense, but he has such a keen narrative tone, if you give it a chance its hard not to fall for:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Nina I just want to check in&lt;br&gt;'cause I think about you every second&lt;br&gt;So I send you this postcard just to say&lt;br&gt;Don't let anyone stand in your way&lt;br&gt;Yours truly, Jens Lekman"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;:)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:01:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Have Lasers!!!!!!!!!!</title><link>http://www.laserportraits.net/post/217209565#comment-20949339</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If I were to sum up the 20th century in just ten photos, it would be this photo, ten times in a row.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:16:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I'll Make Lemonade</title><link>http://borgomani.tumblr.com/post/207048542#comment-20498866</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where can I find a large version of this photo?&lt;br&gt;- would make a stunning desktop!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:39:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Monkton: OMG AB+SV = YAY</title><link>http://monktonvsplankton.tumblr.com/post/193426057#comment-17211128</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the heads up!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:48:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Planklog: This Train Is Taking No Passengers</title><link>http://monktonvsplankton.tumblr.com/post/96508041#comment-8244077</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Indeed it is -&lt;br&gt;"The band took their name from the 1954 novel The Adventures of Augie March by Saul Bellow, citing its poetic, complex prose as a reflection of Richards' vocals."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:11:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: liz ozoa | stay classy - The Lightyears</title><link>http://lizozoa.tumblr.com/post/71127000#comment-5272622</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Review of their new album:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://monktonvsplankton.tumblr.com/post/71368028/plankton-reviews-an-album-london-england-by-the" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://monktonvsplankton.tumblr.com/post/71368028/plankton-reviews-an-album-london-england-by-the"&gt;http://monktonvsplankton.tu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:11:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>