Disqus - Latest Comments for Physboy

Re: Palm Loads the Gun and Puts It To Head, Apple Pulls Trigger

Physboy — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:33:14 -0000

Looks like they redirected the gun towards Apple: http://justanothergeeksite....

Let the cat & mouse games begin!

Re: CableDrops Neaten Desk Top

Physboy — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:48:55 -0000

Excellent find!!

Re: iPhone A True Multimedia Gaming Device

Physboy — Sun, 24 May 2009 15:59:04 -0000

Totally agree about the iPhone's gaming capabilities, not so much the business side of it(Safari Browser, etc...), but definitely the gaming and media side. They really came up with a great gaming console platform that many developers have taken advantage of. This is one of the few places where I have always felt that Apple excels at, great hardware platforms for their OSes!

Re: App Review: Medical Software Triple Play

Physboy — Thu, 21 May 2009 09:23:34 -0000

J, I'll drink to Wyatt recanting his off-topic, personaly biased and inacuarate ad hominems. I was, and remain, kewl with everything else.

Re: App Review: Medical Software Triple Play

Physboy — Wed, 20 May 2009 23:14:59 -0000

Really???

You want to turn this into a personal thing? What I don't understand is why on earth you would take an interjection to the topic, which was not PRO iPhone, as an offense to which you suddenly feel entitled to start pitchin' a hissy fit, and making inaccurate criticisms followed by ad hominem attacks!

I was told by JDoss that comments which were contrary as well as pro on any given topics were welcome at this site. You are making it quite clear that under NO circumstances is anyone, in particular me since you are clearly partaking in ad hominem attacks against me to ad nauseam, allowed to post ANY comments which are not OVERTLY congratulatory or PRO iPhone in nature.

Give me a break, dude. You are waaay out of line.

Regarding being "fanboyed to death" that is specifically why you felt like my comments did nothing but take shots at the whole point of your article, instead of realizing that they were doing nothing but delineating the limitations of the solution your article proposed and left open ended for one to miss interpret the limits on. It is also the reason why the need to elaborate was created in response to the attempts at obfuscating the message I gave originally.