<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for PerfectZero</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/PerfectZero/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/PerfectZero/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:39:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: John Robb on Global Education Trends </title><link>http://blog.jamtoday.org/post/70265208#comment-5105649</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting perspective, but wouldn't education prices have to be significantly higher than, not approaching, their intrinsic value to be "at variance?"  Since the present value of a college education has been higher than the cost (historically, and probably still currently), you could consider higher education itself as a form of arbitrage. It makes sense then that the cost would eventually increase to equal to the present value, but I'm not sure they're high enough yet to label it a bubble.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PerfectZero</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:39:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>