<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Objectivist</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Objectivist/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Objectivist/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:34:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/aug/04/calif-gay-marriage-case/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/aug/04/calif-gay-marriage-case/#comment-66125515</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe if the arguments in favor of Prop 8 had been better this wouldn't have happened?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Rule of Law &amp;amp; The Constitution prevail yet again!&lt;br&gt;Next Up: DADT!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Long live the truly free &amp;amp; truly diverse United States of America!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:34:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FX orders &amp;#8216;Star Trek&amp;#8217; spoof pilot, renews &amp;#8216;Louie&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://livefeed.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/08/fx-renews-louie-orders-sci-fi-comedy-pilot.html#comment-65903651</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yay!ST parody: Sounds hilarious!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:05:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Oprah Winfrey Show&amp;#8217; hits all-time ratings low</title><link>http://livefeed.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/07/oprah-winfrey-show-hits-alltime-ratings-low.html#comment-62455408</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Suggesting the President of the United States go to Africa?  He's an American. The same goes for the other people you listed. Your racism &amp;amp; homophobia are what's completely un-American. If anyone should leave this country, it's you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's so hilarious to read evil people like you who try to qualify your racist hate by saying "we". Isn't that the socialist credo? True Americans base their standards on individual freedoms &amp;amp; ideals, not a collective consensus hysterical w/ hate &amp;amp; fear, no matter how bogus! Obviously you're too cowardly to speak for yourself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When racists/bigots like you write about "historic America", you're merely pining for a time when lynching, internment &amp;amp; Jim Crow laws were accepted &amp;amp; white men whose entitlements that tyranny allowed reigned until those practices nearly brought this country to complete collapse w/ the Bush Administration's tax cuts for the wealthy, crony capitalism &amp;amp; illegal wars. &lt;br&gt;That time is past.&lt;br&gt;Deal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Long live the truly free &amp;amp; diverse United States of America!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:43:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jul/04/man-finds-naked-stranger-snoozing-couch/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jul/04/man-finds-naked-stranger-snoozing-couch/#comment-60587543</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Was it Robert Downey Jr. He's been known to do that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:12:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jul/02/nightclub-mogul-remaking-jacks-la-jolla/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jul/02/nightclub-mogul-remaking-jacks-la-jolla/#comment-60379235</link><description>&lt;p&gt;((as the lightbulb comes on))&lt;br&gt;Ohhhhh...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I always wondered why Jack's went under, as it was always packed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 23:21:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jul/02/nightclub-mogul-remaking-jacks-la-jolla/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jul/02/nightclub-mogul-remaking-jacks-la-jolla/#comment-60325131</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK. Out of curiosity, how's this 1 not going to fail?&lt;br&gt;'Cause it's "Mike's" now instead of "Jack's"?&lt;br&gt;I'm all for entrepreneurship so I wish Mr. Viscuso all the luck he needs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:31:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jul/01/don-coryell/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jul/01/don-coryell/#comment-60323547</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He made football an awesome spectacle-- where the impossible (catch, pass) became possible.&lt;br&gt;Air (insert team here) has become synonymous w/ A+ passing games throughout football.&lt;br&gt;Why he's not in the HOF is tragic.&lt;br&gt;RIP Coach.&lt;br&gt;Your inspiration to the game &amp;amp; this town will not be forgotten.&lt;br&gt;Ring Shming.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:18:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jun/25/thriller-affair-at-the-fair/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jun/25/thriller-affair-at-the-fair/#comment-58728711</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Like all tabloid infected bigots, you can't substantiate your claim that Michael Jackson was a child molester, let alone produce any evidence. Such empty sophistry simply reinforces your hate for someone who will be remembered for his charity &amp;amp; talent long after you &amp;amp; an eon of your worthless spawn are dust.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 04:38:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jun/24/authorities-haul-away-counterfeit-apparel/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jun/24/authorities-haul-away-counterfeit-apparel/#comment-58553334</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Every adult American buys Middle East gas every week"? Can you prove either aspect of your argument?  We do get oil products from other countries. Not everyone owns a car or rides a bus/subway/train.&lt;br&gt;I understand your argument but both contribute to terrorism which makes both equally bad. Just because 1 is done w/ more frequency doesn't make it worse.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:22:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jun/24/authorities-haul-away-counterfeit-apparel/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jun/24/authorities-haul-away-counterfeit-apparel/#comment-58540336</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The worldwide counterfeiting trade is considered to be valued at $500 billion.&lt;br&gt;$500 billion is "small potatoes"?&lt;br&gt;If a knockoff cost on average $50, isn't that the equivalent to a tank of gas? Why is 1 worse than the other?&lt;br&gt;Where's the perspective?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:05:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jun/24/authorities-haul-away-counterfeit-apparel/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jun/24/authorities-haul-away-counterfeit-apparel/#comment-58535309</link><description>&lt;p&gt;2 wrongs, no right.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 21:12:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jun/24/authorities-haul-away-counterfeit-apparel/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jun/24/authorities-haul-away-counterfeit-apparel/#comment-58529404</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Reasons Not To Buy Fake Designer Handbags #2 - Fakes Support Terrorism&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;U.S. authorities have reported that the sale of counterfeit goods, including fake designer handbags, is a source of funding for terrorist groups throughout the world. By purchasing fake designer handbags, consumers are contributing to the growth of terrorism. The worldwide counterfeiting trade is considered to be valued at $500 billion. It has been reported that between October 2005 and September 2006 alone, the Department of Homeland Security seized $155 million worth of counterfeit goods. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2218237/6_reasons_not_to_buy_fake_designer.html?cat=46" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2218237/6_reasons_not_to_buy_fake_designer.html?cat=46"&gt;http://www.associatedconten...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:09:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/weblogs/all-in-favor-politics/2010/jun/09/young-never-thought-itd-be-close/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/weblogs/all-in-favor-politics/2010/jun/09/young-never-thought-itd-be-close/#comment-55538760</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very well said.&lt;br&gt;This should be in his email. &lt;br&gt;anthonyyoung@sandiego.gov &lt;br&gt;He also has open house on Fri from 12pm-2pm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;JSYK-- If you ever decide to run against him, you have my vote.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:40:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Torchwood' interviews with Starz chief Chris Albrecht, creator Russell T. Davies </title><link>http://livefeed.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/06/torchwood-interviews-with-starz-chief-chris-albrecht-creator-russell-t-davies-.html#comment-55391693</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But, Seabee-- It's Sci Fi! Can't they bring Ianto back? Like Spock? Surely R.T. Davies is talented enough. This gives the creators a chance to redeem themselves. Don't forget COE was supposed to be the end. TW's been given new life-- that could include Ianto as well.&lt;br&gt;Given the talent pool, I'm @ least willing to give them a chance.&lt;br&gt;Cheers. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 19:33:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AMC's 'Rubicon' trailer </title><link>http://livefeed.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/06/amc-rubicon-trailer-.html#comment-55390342</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Like a Tea Bagger's convoluted wet dream.&lt;br&gt;No thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 19:22:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jun/08/manchester-giving-control-hyatt/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jun/08/manchester-giving-control-hyatt/#comment-55376482</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where in the article does it say the hotel failed? The article states "Developer Douglas F. Manchester is giving up control of his Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego downtown to Hyatt Hotels in a proposal scheduled to be heard before the San Diego Unified Port District today.". Therefore he's the problem, not the hotel. You, apparently are making things up in order to substantiate your own point of view. So if anyone is thinking erroneous thoughts in order to feel better, it's you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:40:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jun/08/manchester-giving-control-hyatt/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jun/08/manchester-giving-control-hyatt/#comment-55355133</link><description>&lt;p&gt;HA! So the boycott had no effect, huh?&lt;br&gt;Good riddance to bigoted garbage!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:46:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Starz picks up 'Torchwood' </title><link>http://livefeed.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/06/starz-picks-up-torchwood-.html#comment-55182402</link><description>&lt;p&gt;YES! Fantastic News! &lt;br&gt;C. Albrecht once again you show your excellent vision that made HBO the gold standard of pay/cable TV (your absence is deeply felt there).&lt;br&gt;Looking forward to this incredible collaboration!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:49:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/22/mexico-searching-for-tv-producer-in-wifes-death/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/22/mexico-searching-for-tv-producer-in-wifes-death/#comment-51570359</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wonder how much he paid the officials to "disappear"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 02:39:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/16/predators-paradise-coalinga-mental-hospital/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/16/predators-paradise-coalinga-mental-hospital/#comment-50650482</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ugh. Even the name of the place sounds dirty.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 21:40:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/10/obama-nominates-elena-kagan-for-supreme-court/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/10/obama-nominates-elena-kagan-for-supreme-court/#comment-49640530</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You call me a lazy or deficient intellect yet you don't present any evidence to qualify or substantiate your arguments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The significance of Ms. Kagan's potential appointment as the 3rd female appointee in the 200+ year history of the Supreme Court is obvious. More proof of your lack of intelligence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;MarshaB or CommonSenseAmerican, DADSGETNDOWN or whatever worthless moniker you want to hide behind today-- Your pathetic attempts @ intelligence are worthless &amp;amp; sad. You're as fragile &amp;amp; transparent as glass. If glass was stupid. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 05:04:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/10/obama-nominates-elena-kagan-for-supreme-court/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/10/obama-nominates-elena-kagan-for-supreme-court/#comment-49493346</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My assessment of you was solely based on data: Questioning someone's femininity based on their appearance when the information presented identifies them as female indicates lack of character &amp;amp; intelligence. Real women would never do such a thing, therefore you aren't 1. Real men don't find such behavior attractive, therefore you could never have 1.&lt;br&gt;Those are facts.&lt;br&gt;My point is valid. &lt;br&gt;Your inability to understand that &amp;amp; empty attempt to insult me reaffirms it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 02:38:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/10/obama-nominates-elena-kagan-for-supreme-court/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/10/obama-nominates-elena-kagan-for-supreme-court/#comment-49459435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;William Rehnquist didn't have any experience on the bench, either.  Was it OK to confirm him? If so, why is that a problem for Ms. Kagan's appointment?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 23:28:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/10/obama-nominates-elena-kagan-for-supreme-court/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/10/obama-nominates-elena-kagan-for-supreme-court/#comment-49459312</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thurgood Marshall said the initial  Constitution as originally conceived &amp;amp; drafted was defective because it allowed slavery among other injustices. &lt;br&gt;“I do not believe that the meaning of the Constitution was forever ‘fixed’ at the Philadelphia Convention. Nor do I find the wisdom, foresight and sense of justice exhibited by the Framers particularly profound,” Marshall said. “To the contrary, the government they devised was defective from the start, requiring several amendments, a civil war and momentous social transformation to attain the system of constitutional government, and its respect for the individual freedoms and human rights, we hold as fundamental today.”&lt;br&gt;Are you saying he was wrong? Are you defending slavery? Not allowing women the right to vote?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PS: As for not having experience as a judge, William Rehnquist didn't have any experience on the bench, either.  Was it OK to confirm him? If so, why is that a problem for Ms. Kagan's appointment?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 23:27:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/10/obama-nominates-elena-kagan-for-supreme-court/</title><link>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/10/obama-nominates-elena-kagan-for-supreme-court/#comment-49453661</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Since I only deal w/ people of intelligence &amp;amp; character,  obviously we don't know each other.&lt;br&gt;But I am aware of sorry excuses for human beings who want to malign others far superior to them so they attempt to do it based on their appearance.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Objectivist</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 22:58:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>