<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ONewhouse</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/ONewhouse/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/ONewhouse/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:03:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A qualified ReTweet microsyntax idea</title><link>http://lebleu.org/blog/2009/05/31/a-qualified-retweet-microsyntax-idea/#comment-15740527</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Guillaume, I'll head over there and check out the links. And many thanks also for following ecotwollar. Please use it, I only learn more by doing. What it does, it accepts the Twollar premise of recirculation through.. &amp;gt; charity &amp;gt; business &amp;gt; tweets &amp;gt; .. But it states that the eco value we can add to this flow by using it as a micro-innovation vehicle is in fact only upward: by acknowledging someone and learning from others tweets, the "eco" portion of a twollar tag don't become a negative credit, only the "Twollar" portion. (I have ideas to develop this notion some other way...) You have 100. I look forward to you comments about the suggestions I give here: &lt;a href="http://wikiwikimoney.com/ecoTwollar" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://wikiwikimoney.com/ecoTwollar"&gt;http://wikiwikimoney.com/ec...&lt;/a&gt; Do you think it is too complicated, restrictive, etc..., do you think it is worth using in this experimental stage...?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;________________________________&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Otto Newhouse</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:03:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A qualified ReTweet microsyntax idea</title><link>http://lebleu.org/blog/2009/05/31/a-qualified-retweet-microsyntax-idea/#comment-15052769</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, I like this idea...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Only stumbled it on now, appropriately from an RT retweet of your follower ;)  (I noticed that you got unfollow me after the Twit crunch.)&lt;br&gt;The idea I have been promoting with ecotwollar is that in one main #eco stream, there can be qualifiers for smaller micro-streams such as #watersaving etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Spawning your idea that way, an example would be RT 2 #CO2 #saving @giyom for carpooling with friend today (original link to twitpic.) Compared to this, as I originally tried out: &lt;a href="http://www.placemark.com.au/ecotwollar.html#before_giving_it_away" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.placemark.com.au/ecotwollar.html#before_giving_it_away"&gt;http://www.placemark.com.au...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Pls email if this is replied to or DM tweet me, whichever is more convenient.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Otto Newhouse</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:13:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Is Your Twitter Carbon Footprint?</title><link>http://keetsa.com/blog/reduce/what-is-your-twitter-carbon-footprint/#comment-13804374</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Crazy fun"...hope tweeps will get it...;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Otto Newhouse</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 04:59:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>