<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for NiteStar</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/NiteStar/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/NiteStar/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 13:49:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra: All your questions answered</title><link>https://pocketnow.com/samsung-galaxy-s22-ultra-faq#comment-5773013370</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does the S22 Ultra have an SpO2 sensor like the Note series had, so it can measure pulse and SpO2 levels?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 13:49:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Download WinMend Data Recovery - MajorGeeks</title><link>http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/winmend_data_recovery.html#comment-5182279681</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It appears that the company that made this program was acquired by Verifone and they discontinued this program and it is no longer supported by the new Verifone-managed company. :-/&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 03:00:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Download Eassos Recovery Free - MajorGeeks</title><link>https://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/eassos_recovery_free.html#comment-5182276742</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a newer version of this program on the company's website.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 02:54:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 30+ Best Android Apps of the Month [February 2018]</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/phandroid/30_best_android_apps_of_the_month_february_2018/#comment-3746702234</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I know young calc ruined my ability to do maths but the article's title is 30+ apps, yet i count about half that? 🤔&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 05:46:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bank of America app update lets you schedule appointments with bankers and open a new checking account</title><link>https://www.androidpolice.com/2017/12/08/bank-america-app-update-lets-schedule-appointments-bankers-open-new-checking-account/#comment-3653557426</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While I'm fed up to the gills with the banking industry in general, I have to admit that the ability to set up ATM transactions via the app is pretty fecking cool. I just walk up to an ATM, hold my phone up to it to authenticate myself, and out pops money.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;People who witness this stare in disbelief and try to get the ATM to dispense money to them by holding their phones up to it. But it's all a matter of the app authenticating you to the ATM via your phone's bio-authentication features (this may only work with the Samsung Galaxy S7 &amp;amp; Note 8 phones and the BofA app, according to my banking rep).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In any event, it's the wave of the future. I can see it now, walking up to any bank's ATM, authenticating with your smartphone using its bio-data authentication features, and having money pop out because you already set up the transaction in your banking app. How cool a future would that be?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 19:57:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Bronx Diamond in the Election Rough</title><link>http://politicsofhope.com/a-bronx-diamond-in-the-election-rough.html#comment-3514800214</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't mind that you've re-posted my article on your site but please attribute me as the author. This article originally appeared at &lt;a href="https://goo.gl/QgVmgr" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://goo.gl/QgVmgr"&gt;https://goo.gl/QgVmgr&lt;/a&gt; and first appeared on my personal blog at &lt;a href="https://goo.gl/mCwZfj" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://goo.gl/mCwZfj"&gt;https://goo.gl/mCwZfj&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 21:23:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Study: Natural Cycles Play Big Part In Arctic Ice Melt | The Daily Caller</title><link>http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/14/study-natural-cycles-cause-half-of-all-arctic-ice-loss/#comment-3204604421</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Study: Natural Cycles Cause Half Of All Arctic Ice Loss" by Chris White | The Daily Caller&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So what causes the other half? [Even if nature swung back], human actions would still contribute to sea ice melt in the area.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yet that's the only concession the author gives to the 50% of Arctic ice loss caused by humans. Humans should do everything to minimize any negative impact on the environment that sustains them, which includes Arctic ice loss.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read more: &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/2n7TVFi" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/2n7TVFi"&gt;http://bit.ly/2n7TVFi&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:55:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Won&amp;#8217;t Believe What Facebook Suspended Me For This Time</title><link>https://forwardprogressives.com/you-wont-believe-what-facebook-suspended-me-for-this-time/#comment-3118235139</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm looking to speak with anyone who's been blocked, banned, suspended, or otherwise had any of their social media accounts impeded for various reasons -- whether justified or not. Thanks! &lt;a href="https://www.facebook.com/TheSymposium/posts/1307282445961641?pnref=story" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.facebook.com/TheSymposium/posts/1307282445961641?pnref=story"&gt;https://www.facebook.com/Th...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:23:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WATCH: Bernie Sanders has some harsh words for Debbie Wasserman Schultz</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/07/watch-bernie-sanders-has-some-harsh-words-for-debbie-wasserman-schultz/#comment-2800766370</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The fact that they were ready to go on April 26th implies that they were planning to support Hillary and not Bernie BEFORE April 26th. Exactly when, I'm not sure, because the email archive contained no emails prior to April 22nd.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:09:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WATCH: Bernie Sanders has some harsh words for Debbie Wasserman Schultz</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/07/watch-bernie-sanders-has-some-harsh-words-for-debbie-wasserman-schultz/#comment-2800763764</link><description>&lt;p&gt;1. He wasn't 'speaking privately" to others inside the DNC. They were actively planning material to be sent out to the public long before the voting process ended. This was not a conversation. This was actual planning.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. The evidence does support the conclusions I've drawn.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. We don't know that the evidence was obtained illegally. We don't know if any laws were broken in obtaining this information. The DNC's servers could have had horrible security and it's more than possible no laws were broken in entering their systems to garner this info.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. Wikileaks' reputation is impeccable. They do not publish information that is false, misleading, or that has been tampered with. They publish raw data. That's what they're known for, and it's why they've received so many awards. Maybe you should follow some of the links in the article.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5. Your morals aren't my morals. Don't preach your morals as the standard by which I should abide.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6. Nothing herein is being used for partisan purposes, nor is it being used or anti-partisan purposes. The Republican party isn't attacking the Democrats. And this most certainly is not being used to support the Democratic party.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7. Keep drinking your Kool-Aid. I'll be LMMFGAO when the DNC (and the GOP) implodes over all its corruption.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:07:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WATCH: Bernie Sanders has some harsh words for Debbie Wasserman Schultz</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/07/watch-bernie-sanders-has-some-harsh-words-for-debbie-wasserman-schultz/#comment-2800751413</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is *the* funniest defense I've ever heard. Sure, she was Obama's pick, after Obama reconciled with Hillary and became his Secretary of State! #LMGAO&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2016 12:58:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WATCH: Bernie Sanders has some harsh words for Debbie Wasserman Schultz</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/07/watch-bernie-sanders-has-some-harsh-words-for-debbie-wasserman-schultz/#comment-2800658864</link><description>&lt;p&gt;#DNCLeak Email Shows DNC Planning for Clinton as Nominee Before One-Third of Nation Even Voted &lt;a href="http://ow.ly/U4Zq302xWFL" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ow.ly/U4Zq302xWFL"&gt;http://ow.ly/U4Zq302xWFL&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Before the last 16 states concluded their primary process, a leaked email—part of the DNC Email Archive published by Wikileaks—shows that planning for former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to be the Democratic nominee long before one-third of the nation even had a say in the matter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The email below shows that the DNC had already completed content proclaiming their nominee to be Hillary Clinton on the morning of April 26, 2016—before 16 states had completed their primary voting process. The sender of the e-mail, Eric Reif, is a DNC staffer. The email contains content written to be sent out by various members of the DNC, including DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, DNC CEO Amy K. Dacey, and President Barack Obama.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Hi all — We are starting to plan ahead with messaging to our supporters for the end of the primary and transition to the general. Below are a handful of emails and graphic copy for the initial few days of that change, arranged below in the order in which we’ll send them as we’ve laid out in a memo to Amy:"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:51:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Samsung Galaxy S5&amp;#8217;s ISOCELL image sensor explained</title><link>https://www.androidauthority.com/isocell-how-it-works-344628/#comment-2677871471</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is more than I ever wanted to know about the way smartphone cameras work but it was all explained in very easy-to-understand language for the photo-taking novice. Thanks so much for keeping it interesting enough to read through. I love the content AA produces; most of it is along these lines! :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 00:36:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If you ever needed a reason to uninstall ES File Explorer, this is it</title><link>https://www.androidauthority.com/uninstall-es-file-explorer-691930/#comment-2673263986</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, this answers one question but, what do you replace it with? 😞&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 02:59:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 10 Best Free Video Editing Software for Windows</title><link>http://filmora.wondershare.com/video-editor/free-video-editing-software-windows.html#comment-2631648765</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the tip! :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 10:50:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why This Veteran Will Cast His Super Tuesday Vote For Bernie Sanders</title><link>http://www.wbur.org/cognoscenti/2016/02/26/super-tuesday-clinton-versus-sanders-andrew-carleen#comment-2536543091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the most well-reasoned and intelligent analysis and endorsement of Bernie Sanders's foreign policy platform I've read to date. If only we could get more people to take the time to realize the truth and analyze the establishment's propaganda for what it is...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 06:55:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smoking Gun: Hillary Ordered Staffer to Break Federal Law</title><link>http://www.thepcgraveyard.com/2016/01/08/smoking-gun-hillary-ordered-staffer-to-break-federal-law/#comment-2529043233</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What's the source for this?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:02:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clinton Accuses Sanders of ‘Artful Smear’ Over Campaign Donations, Wall Street – WATCH</title><link>http://www.towleroad.com/2016/02/artful-smear/#comment-2503953299</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Except, there's this little thing called campaign finance law, and all of his contributions and expenditures are available for public scrutiny.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 04:01:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clinton Accuses Sanders of ‘Artful Smear’ Over Campaign Donations, Wall Street – WATCH</title><link>http://www.towleroad.com/2016/02/artful-smear/#comment-2503951090</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@timncguy, your wish is my command. Please watch this 5-minute video for your answer, and note that this video is from 2004, long before presidential campaigns were launched. That way, you can detemine for yourself the veracity of these claims: &lt;a href="https://youtu.be/hbWzE4JhQJY" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://youtu.be/hbWzE4JhQJY"&gt;https://youtu.be/hbWzE4JhQJY&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 03:57:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clinton Accuses Sanders of ‘Artful Smear’ Over Campaign Donations, Wall Street – WATCH</title><link>http://www.towleroad.com/2016/02/artful-smear/#comment-2503949481</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently, Sanders, with his poor-man's campaign (which has received over 3.5million contributions averaging $27 each), is on track to exceed Hillary's fundraising efforts. So maybe, just maybe, you can run a national campaign without taking contributions from big-money interests to which one would then be beholden.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 03:55:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clinton Accuses Sanders of ‘Artful Smear’ Over Campaign Donations, Wall Street – WATCH</title><link>http://www.towleroad.com/2016/02/artful-smear/#comment-2503948310</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Griffin Lewis, why don't you try watching the video instead of coming back with attacks that employ the ad hominem and other logical fallacies? *I* do not have to specify any votes she changed in response to campaign donations she received. Watch the video and become acquainted with the truth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As to why Bernie didn't respond to this charge during the debate, I can only surmise that a possible reason he didn't do so is that during a live debate, candidates do not have access to the Internet or search engines such as Google. However, the moderators do, and I'd like to know why neither Chuck nor Rachel responded with this video, especially as they both knew about it prior to the debate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 03:53:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 10 Best Free Video Editing Software for Windows</title><link>http://filmora.wondershare.com/video-editor/free-video-editing-software-windows.html#comment-2502465760</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Movica hasn't been updated since 2008. It looked like it has promise but won't work on 64-bit systems and the latest build is over six years old. :(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 09:10:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hillary Clinton: Not Everyone Who Takes Donations Is Bought</title><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/02/04/hillary_clinton_i_never_changed_my_view_or_my_vote_after_recieving_donations.html#comment-2497619466</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Did Sanders Smear Clinton or Is This A Bait-and-Switch? &lt;a href="http://ow.ly/XYPOz" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ow.ly/XYPOz"&gt;http://ow.ly/XYPOz&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 09:28:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hillary Clinton: Not Everyone Who Takes Donations Is Bought</title><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/02/04/hillary_clinton_i_never_changed_my_view_or_my_vote_after_recieving_donations.html#comment-2497618344</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This wasn't the entire exchange: &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riGfVgZa940" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riGfVgZa940"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/wat...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 09:27:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hillary Clinton: Not Everyone Who Takes Donations Is Bought</title><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/02/04/hillary_clinton_i_never_changed_my_view_or_my_vote_after_recieving_donations.html#comment-2497616817</link><description>&lt;p&gt;She said "ever" not "never" -- but she told a pretty big lie, as called out by Senator Warren, back in 2004: &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbWzE4JhQJY" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbWzE4JhQJY"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/wat...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NiteStar</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 09:26:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>