<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/NeilTheEthicalWerewolf/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/NeilTheEthicalWerewolf/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 10:44:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: On Disliking Thai Food</title><link>https://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2021/08/on-disliking-thai-food#comment-5506578929</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your issues regarding Thai food are perfectly sensible. The problem with Weingarten is that it's like he said "Italian food is so unimaginative, They never even tried using tomatoes".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The line in your post that gets it right is "His complaints also make no sense to anyone even vaguely familiar with Indian cuisine." He criticized Indian food for using only one spice, because he thought curry was a single spice rather than the variable mix of many spices that it is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 10:44:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Market Volatility Could Pick Up, and so Could Action in Private Prison Stocks</title><link>https://realmoney.thestreet.com/investing/stocks/market-volatility-could-pick-up-and-so-could-action-in-private-prison-stocks-15048836#comment-4570437675</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"private prisons have not been perfect, but they have filled a need for strapped state government budgets, allowing states to avoid capital costs of building new facilities and cutting costs per inmate"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Private prisons may actually be hurting state government budgets, by lobbying for measures that result in more inmates. Such measures would mean more spending for state governments and more revenue for themselves. In the worst case, these measures could put more people in prison who shouldn't really be there -- a bad deal for everybody except the private prison companies.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 04:24:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Washington Monthly | Pelosi Forever</title><link>http://washingtonmonthly.com/2008/05/30/pelosi-forever/#comment-4422510914</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's nice to see this old post from more than a decade ago! I've recently posted more on this and other great Pelosi stories at my blog:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://neilsinhababu.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-pelosi-chronicles.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://neilsinhababu.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-pelosi-chronicles.html"&gt;http://neilsinhababu.blogsp...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2019 10:15:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New Senate Bill Is Still Unimaginably Horrible Legislation</title><link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2017/07/new-senate-bill-still-unimaginably-horrible-legislation#comment-3415250448</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If a Republican can buy enough votes via pet projects to make up for the lost ones, it might work out. I agree, it's a long shot for McConnell, but it might be his best shot.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 15:37:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New Senate Bill Is Still Unimaginably Horrible Legislation</title><link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2017/07/new-senate-bill-still-unimaginably-horrible-legislation#comment-3415222181</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yglesias has a guess as to what McConnell might be up to here: setting the bill up so that he has a few hundred billion to give out for his more moderate Senators' pet projects, to buy their votes. See the last section:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/7/13/15965798/bcra-tax-changes-why" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/7/13/15965798/bcra-tax-changes-why"&gt;https://www.vox.com/policy-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 15:21:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I stopped Earning to&amp;nbsp;Give</title><link>https://80000hours.org/2015/06/why-i-stopped-earning-to-give/#comment-2070925123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great! I'd be happy to help with that, if I can do it at a convenient time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 19:22:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I stopped Earning to&amp;nbsp;Give</title><link>https://80000hours.org/2015/06/why-i-stopped-earning-to-give/#comment-2070400335</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for writing this! I think about these issues often, as a philosophy professor who has taken the Giving What We Can 10% pledge. It's good to hear from someone who explored an alternative path that I maybe could've taken, and I'm sure it'll be extra helpful to others who have the decision ahead of them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are worthwhile things to be done in philosophy that may exceed the value of earning to give, especially in light of the difficulty of performing at a high level when one isn't suited to one's tasks and one's colleagues. I wish you success in doing these things in your academic career.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 14:25:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Response to Jason Brennan</title><link>http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/11/response-to-jason-brennan/#comment-1689158649</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Support the tropes" &lt;br&gt;Highly recommended, Excellent BHLer, A++++, would buy again&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 03:14:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Planet Fitness Cites Obamacare for Tax on Gym Memberships</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/02/10/Planet-Fitness-Cites-Obamacare-for-Tax-on-Gym-Memberships#comment-1239333956</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Since the law doesn't actually support this, it's possible that the extra charge is in fact "a change in your membership fee."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:42:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What This Guy Says about Inequality Will Make You Stand Up and Cheer (or Puke)</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/politics/2014/01/28/what-this-guy-says-about-inequality-will-make-you-stand-up-and-cheer-or-puke/#comment-1223832046</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But don't you have the intuition that many other people's intuition isn't a reliable value detector? Especially the people who think weird things about inequality and intuit that you're not a reliable value detector? That may be most of the people in the grim history of humanity. (Everything is not, and has not historically been, just fine.) And if people are this way, why should we trust their judgments about some pleasure having intrinsic badness? Maybe intuition works for some things, but the sheer amount of human moral error suggests that it doesn't work for moral value.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Instead of using moral intuition, which has been screwing us up throughout history, let's start trying to figure out which mental processes are generating true beliefs about moral value, and which ones are just cognitive biases. Even if people get it wrong on lots of stuff, they're not bad at knowing what their experiences are like. The foundations of hedonism are more secure than the foundations of any other moral theory.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:47:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What This Guy Says about Inequality Will Make You Stand Up and Cheer (or Puke)</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/politics/2014/01/28/what-this-guy-says-about-inequality-will-make-you-stand-up-and-cheer-or-puke/#comment-1222979014</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think we can detect the value of pleasure in a very reliable way: through knowing what our immediate experiences are like, and knowing that pleasure-experiences have goodness just as yellow-experiences have brightness. Humans don't screw up very often at knowing the intrinsic properties of their experience. Our other processes for forming moral beliefs are far less reliable and should be abandoned. So we should accept the goodness of pleasure and doubt everything else.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cuteness, as far as I can tell, is subjective. So while it isn't objectively valuable, the pleasure it creates is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 23:41:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What This Guy Says about Inequality Will Make You Stand Up and Cheer (or Puke)</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/politics/2014/01/28/what-this-guy-says-about-inequality-will-make-you-stand-up-and-cheer-or-puke/#comment-1222129135</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know why other people are interested in inequality. But utilitarians like me worry about the declining marginal utility of money, and that's why we don't like massively unequal distributions.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:35:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here&amp;#8217;s What Mitt Won&amp;#8217;t Tell You: President Obama Is Winning</title><link>http://www.nationalmemo.com/heres-what-mitt-wont-tell-you-president-obama-is-winning/#comment-697704740</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bog Bird?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 06:31:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: North Carolina: A Centenarian&amp;#8217;s Paradise</title><link>http://eriksoderstrom.com/2012/10/22/north-carolina-a-centenarians-paradise/#comment-689888076</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's actually just an artifact of the way computer systems deal with errors in the birthdate field: they all default to 1900. It's especially a problem if people registered in the past when birth dates weren't collected:  &lt;a href="http://www.donkeylicious.com/2012/10/fraudulent-112-year-old-voters-nope.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.donkeylicious.com/2012/10/fraudulent-112-year-old-voters-nope.html"&gt;http://www.donkeylicious.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:34:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wrong Track</title><link>http://prospect.org/cs/articles?article=wrong_track#comment-293555461</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The interstate highway system eats up billions as well.  Maybe we shut that one down too?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 04:16:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Misinforming the Public</title><link>http://prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped_archive?month=06&amp;year=2011&amp;base_name=misinforming_the_public#comment-228020888</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, this is clearly not the way representative democracy is supposed to work.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 05:00:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Limits Of Mike Huckabee</title><link>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2011/05/the-limits-of-mike-huckabee/#comment-204503326</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I’d say the John Edwards campaign in 2008 did a decent job."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So do I.  And so did you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 11:05:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Michael Gerson Think Alcohol Should Be Banned? Does He Know That Penguins Can Swim?</title><link>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2011/05/does-michael-gerson-think-alcohol-should-be-banned-does-he-know-that-penguins-can-swim/#comment-201947827</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm with you, but it's not too bad for a guy with a ThinkProgress blog to beat up on bad right-wing WaPo op-eds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 05:33:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Want To Bench Press More?  Stop Benching </title><link>http://www.thepostgame.com/node/1294#comment-201909069</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Check the byline -- it's written by a man named "Jim Smith." &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 02:37:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Revenge Killings In Benghazi</title><link>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2011/05/revenge-killings-in-benghazi/#comment-201483980</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Googling produces a Gadhafi speech about hunting down and killing protestors.  But it seems that the catchy tune was added by a YouTube remixer dude.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/28/world/middleeast/28youtube.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/28/world/middleeast/28youtube.html"&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2011...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 12:15:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Revenge Killings In Benghazi</title><link>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2011/05/revenge-killings-in-benghazi/#comment-201481362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gadhafi did that?  Wow, I hadn't heard that detail... do you have a link or some such?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 12:10:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Endgame</title><link>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2011/01/endgame-376/#comment-128541726</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All Girl Summer Fun Band!  Awesome.  Getting all their albums finally gave me the ooo wee ooo that I needed in my life.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:55:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://meltingdolls.tumblr.com/post/1218532276</title><link>http://meltingdolls.tumblr.com/post/1218532276#comment-82904743</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh, that was me, but I'm using a public computer and somebody else was signed in.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:34:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://resnikoff.tumblr.com/post/1072287106</title><link>http://resnikoff.tumblr.com/post/1072287106#comment-75413753</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nietzsche is an error theorist about existing moral discourse -- that's the sense in which he's a nihilist.  Of course, he does have values of some kind or another.  He doesn't seem to think they have the objectivity or universality that moral values do, so I wouldn't call them moral values.  I read him as interested in a kind of subjective value, grounded in the passions of the agents for whom the value exists.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(I'm actually working on a paper on this right now.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:55:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PETA and Feminism.</title><link>http://theinformedvegan.tumblr.com/post/176422109#comment-17556465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sex certainly sells, but there are complimentary ways of selling with sex and derogatory ones.  This is probably the most complimentary way I've seen in our culture.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NeilTheEthicalWerewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 01:56:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>