<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for NeilHouston</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/NeilHouston/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/NeilHouston/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:45:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 3.8.2</title><link>http://bigcitytalk.org.uk/552/382/#comment-5844158</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd agree regarding the quality of the surface around the canal, once you leave the 'main' centre, i.e towards wolverhampton it's suddenly grass/chips; when wet with the amount of cycle and foot traffic it doesn't end up the best and is hard to traverse.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also like Nicky said, once you are in the network, you have no idea where you are spatially compared to the landscape and roads etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, the network is lovely, and just needs to be considered more so than it has.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:45:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 3.8.3</title><link>http://bigcitytalk.org.uk/554/383/#comment-5844047</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, this is news to me.  We have a river?  I'd love to be able to navigate around riverbanks, and see the wildlife etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As Jon above mentions, such a continuous feature is key; whenever we consider how many canals we have in the city, its a travesty that we don't have access to the river.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:40:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>