<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for mitchwagner</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/mitchwagner/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/mitchwagner/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 15:13:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: macOS dialog shortcut keys - BrettTerpstra.com</title><link>http://brettterpstra.com/2018/06/19/macos-dialog-shortcut-keys/#comment-3951547626</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The muscle memory thing seems like a good tip. Often once I've found the keyboard shortcut using Alfred, I just hit Enter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 15:13:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: macOS dialog shortcut keys - BrettTerpstra.com</title><link>http://brettterpstra.com/2018/06/19/macos-dialog-shortcut-keys/#comment-3951485331</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My brain doesn't seem to be wired to be able to remember many keyboard shortcuts. Any pointers on helping learn them better? I use both CheatSheet and the menubar search workflow in Alfred, which helps a little.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 14:35:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Electric Pork is ready for you to try</title><link>http://scripting.com/2017/03/11/electricPorkIsReadyForYouToTry.html#comment-3202064860</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nope.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:25:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Electric Pork is ready for you to try</title><link>http://scripting.com/2017/03/11/electricPorkIsReadyForYouToTry.html#comment-3201864292</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Links seem to result in the app not seeing any text. Hopefully, this screenshot explains the problem:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0cb3354c09f22d3bea0cd72981dd8f6ede66a2d0b2a37242059fe42309c83b2a.png" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0cb3354c09f22d3bea0cd72981dd8f6ede66a2d0b2a37242059fe42309c83b2a.png"&gt;https://uploads.disquscdn.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If I remove the link, the text shows up correctly in the preview box. I did not try sending at that point. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2017 10:19:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Electric Pork is ready for you to try</title><link>http://scripting.com/2017/03/11/electricPorkIsReadyForYouToTry.html#comment-3199505388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My RSS feed is not showing up. I've created two tweetstorms. Still seeing this message, which I saw after I did no tweetstorms and after my first: &lt;a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/665ca2de7bf23825676df6c16834f63abd30ad4f796e486ca07ede0e96cf9c3c.png" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/665ca2de7bf23825676df6c16834f63abd30ad4f796e486ca07ede0e96cf9c3c.png"&gt;https://uploads.disquscdn.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2017 16:20:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Electric Pork is ready for you to try</title><link>http://scripting.com/2017/03/11/electricPorkIsReadyForYouToTry.html#comment-3199500705</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One more. Starts here: &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/MitchWagner/status/840672703703007232" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://twitter.com/MitchWagner/status/840672703703007232"&gt;https://twitter.com/MitchWa...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2017 16:16:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Electric Pork is ready for you to try</title><link>http://scripting.com/2017/03/11/electricPorkIsReadyForYouToTry.html#comment-3199497224</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My porky tweetstorm:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://twitter.com/MitchWagner/status/840671226951426048" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://twitter.com/MitchWagner/status/840671226951426048"&gt;https://twitter.com/MitchWa...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Question: Is it supposed to post the follow-up tweets as replies to the preceding tweets? My Electric Pork tweetstorm does not appear to do that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for letting me in on the test.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2017 16:13:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Electric Pork coming soooon</title><link>http://scripting.com/2017/03/09/electricPorkComingSoooon.html#comment-3196629917</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Electric Pork is a great name, btw.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:44:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Electric Pork coming soooon</title><link>http://scripting.com/2017/03/09/electricPorkComingSoooon.html#comment-3196628958</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd like to test it please. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:44:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canonical Space Goo</title><link>http://www.theincomparable.com/theincomparable/224/index.php#comment-1736903343</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, for Pete's sake, Erika prefaced her comments by saying she loved the movie. I thought she made some good points. I'm not sure whether I agree with her -- it's been a few years since I watched this movie -- but I certainly wouldn't ascribe her opinion to Evil Social Justice Warrior Agenda.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anybody who starts a comment by saying that they wince whenever a woman appears on a nerd podcast is someone whose opinions are automatically suspect. What The Minister is saying here is that women are fine on nerd podcasts -- encouraged, even! -- so long as they follow the male agenda. Which is hogwash. There is no male agenda or women's agenda. There's just people giving their opinions about movies and TV shows and stuff, saying what they like and what they don't like.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:50:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PR Pitches Are Valuable Real Estate</title><link>http://itsfreshground.com/2013/04/pr-pitches-are-valuable-real-estate/#comment-859799470</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All true!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Subject line and first two sentences are exactly how I read PR pitches.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another rookie mistake I see: Starting the pitch with background that I already know. "Cloud computing is changing the face of enterprise IT." Once I see that, I stop reading and start skimming the first paragraph for keywords. If I don't see any interesting keywords in the first graf -- if it all looks like more background, more stuff I already know if I'm interested in your client's story -- then I just close the email and move on. And I don't even look at the second paragraph, or anything else.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, the pitch should never, ever include an attachment. Never, never ever.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:12:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ocean swimming as&amp;nbsp;meditation</title><link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/26/ocean-swimming-as-meditation.html#comment-813389224</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds lovely, Xeni. Also, sounds like you're on the mend. Glad to hear it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:16:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nexus 7: a perfect, low-cost, rugged, easy tablet that works for the whole&amp;nbsp;family</title><link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/02/nexus-7-a-perfect-low-cost.html#comment-700058903</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good post, Cory. I like my Nexus 7 a lot. I bought it when the model first came out, and I spend hours a day on it. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the NewsRob recommendation. Nicer than the default Google Reader app, which I had been using, or GReader. I'd love to see a post from you on your favorite Nexus 7 apps. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do you do any writing on the Nexus 7? What app do you use for that? Do you use an external keyboard?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For a Twitter app that supports muting, try Tweetings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dwdesign.tweetings&amp;amp;hl=en" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dwdesign.tweetings&amp;amp;hl=en"&gt;https://play.google.com/sto...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 20:57:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://mitchwagner.tumblr.com/post/9886498769</title><link>http://mitchwagner.tumblr.com/post/9886498769#comment-303813002</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You didn't have beds?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:05:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://mitchwagner.com/post/9041311421</title><link>http://mitchwagner.com/post/9041311421#comment-289348344</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, but Notepad++ is Windows-only, isn't it? I'm on a Mac.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:16:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://mitchwagner.com/post/8999679320</title><link>http://mitchwagner.com/post/8999679320#comment-288289398</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, Patrick. Teresa blogged about this a couple of years ago, and we discussed it there. I linked to her blog in my post above. And I blogged about this book earlier when I started reading it. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:09:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://mitchwagner.com/post/8825496819</title><link>http://mitchwagner.com/post/8825496819#comment-285524907</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I seem to recall Shakespeare was not respected for a century or two after his death. And different generations have interpreted Shakespeare differently, finding different elements of his plays important. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We recently saw a production of "Taming of the Shrew" and found the ending jarring. I'd completely forgotten how the play ends. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 14:10:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://mitchwagner.com/post/8690620648</title><link>http://mitchwagner.com/post/8690620648#comment-281313569</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm.... I hadn't thought about a collection, I was thinking of publishing them as individual stories. How do individual stories sell?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, if I publish the individual stories, afterward I can bundle them up into a collection, maybe do a nice intro or set of intros or something. &lt;br&gt;I'm excited about this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:53:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://mitchwagner.com/post/8216190926</title><link>http://mitchwagner.com/post/8216190926#comment-268746134</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Demonkid - Do people want that level of engagement in their entertainment? I know when I'm done with a day's work I want to watch TV or read. I don't want to do more work in the name of entertainment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:41:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://mitchwagner.com/post/7886242829</title><link>http://mitchwagner.com/post/7886242829#comment-259705311</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Chris, just to clarify, this is not something I've ever seen. But I believe it happens. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://mitchwagner.com/post/7762964983</title><link>http://mitchwagner.com/post/7762964983#comment-256104368</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We're watching a lot of series on Netflix streaming: Rescue Me, Weeds, Parks  &amp;amp; Recreation, The Larry Sanders show. The last movie we watched was "Fantastic Voyage." I guess that counts as arcane. We've seen a couple of movies in the theater this year. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:24:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://mitchwagner.com/post/7532781957</title><link>http://mitchwagner.com/post/7532781957#comment-249577669</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, it's on my list of Movies To Give Another Try When I'm in a Different Mood.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:00:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://mitchwagner.com/post/7495381102</title><link>http://mitchwagner.com/post/7495381102#comment-247773744</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually shutting down the computer is hard-core. I salute you. I don't know if I'm ready to go that far yet. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:45:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://mitchwagner.com/post/7495381102</title><link>http://mitchwagner.com/post/7495381102#comment-247773488</link><description>&lt;p&gt;John, I remember that from my daily newspaper days. I worked Sunday through Thursday, and every fourth Saturday (with Thursday off as a comp day that week). I'd rather have had a Friday night, especially since I was single then.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:45:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://mitchwagner.com/post/7357409880</title><link>http://mitchwagner.com/post/7357409880#comment-245870421</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ha! That's great!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MitchWagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:29:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>