<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of McAlpine</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/McAlpine/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/McAlpine/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:14:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: FrontPage Magazine - In Defense of Capitalism</title><link>(u'http://frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=36305',%2017026297L)#comment-17026297</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sjbn, just admit your a Statist and go a way. Noting you say can be proven, and when given facts and history you ignore them and jump to something else. &lt;br&gt;Educate yourself and read "How Capitalism Saved America" by Thomas DiLorenzo. &lt;br&gt;But then again you take take a jackass to knowledge , but you can't make him think. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:54:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: White House Pulls Guest from CNN over New Obama Book - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>(u'http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/white-house-pulls-guest-from-cnn-over-new-obama-book/28125',%2017294370L)#comment-17294370</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Keith Olbermann? You must be one of the three people that watches that lying fool. ALSO, why does the left always bring up Bush when Obama does something cowardly or stupid? At least the Republicans have real men that don't bring up, or attack, past presidents. Now that we know Obama did not write "dreams of my father" it does not make him as smart as the left claims. Just a fraud.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:10:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;N-Word&amp;#8217; Sign Dogs Would-Be Tea Party Leader</title><link>(u'http://washingtonindependent.com/73036/n-word-sign-dogs-would-be-tea-party-leader',%2028759847L)#comment-28759847</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is not offensive. What is offensive are the Democrats pushing Socialism on us. Nanny Pelosi, and Hairy Reid are OFFENSIVE. LIBERALS are OFFENSIVE. There is more racism in the Democratic party than there is in this sign. They use it to divide and conquer, don't fall for their tricks. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:31:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ‘There is zero chance that Donald Trump would ever be hired by the American people to do this job.’ - TVNewser</title><link>(u'http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/there-is-zero-chance-that-donald-trump-would-ever-be-hired-by-the-american-people-to-do-this-job/62133',%20182244020L)#comment-182244020</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I resent the fact that you use the Marxist label of Racist Tea bagger.  That is very flippant for someone who obviously lives in their Mother's basement and never held a real job. T.E.A. stands for Taxed Enough Already, HOW IS THAT RACIST?  What Blacks, Asians, Hispanics don't think that the Government should live with in its means? The TEA party is also following the US CONSTITUTION what is wrong with that. It is a document that has given more people freedom and a chance of prosperity then any other document in the world. &lt;br&gt;Do we have our faults, yes people are not perfect. But its a document that allows us to correct our faults. So how is living with Freedom Racist?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 22:42:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The science is settled: US liberals really are the dumbest creatures on the planet</title><link>(u'http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/?p=100093577',%20234586765L)#comment-234586765</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Liberal never read the real news.  Hansen's hockey stick graph was proven to be a complete fraud.  REAL scientist ran random numbers through his program and got a "hockey stick"  something like 80% of the time.  You should read  Karl R. Popper's paper Science as Falsification, do a (Google search) He points out that anyone can find facts to support there theory, the real trick is to find fact that the theory predicts but has not been seen yet.  GW has none of this, and when facts come out that show it to be false, the messenger is attacked.  GW predict Hot Spots, but none can be found. The evidence mounts that  GW is a pushed by Statists that want to steal your property rights, and enslave you. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 03:37:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The science is settled: US liberals really are the dumbest creatures on the planet</title><link>(u'http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/?p=100093577',%20234592558L)#comment-234592558</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dwrice, so in 2005 when Al Gore said that GW would cause frequent  monster hurricanes, and we had none for the&lt;br&gt;next 6 years, I guess you laughed at him too.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, the same liars that claim man-made global warming, have&lt;br&gt;lied about recorded breaking global temperatures.  The 1930’s were the warmest in history, and in&lt;br&gt;fact world temperatures started falling after George W. Bush took office. Maybe&lt;br&gt;it was Bush that saved us.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 04:02:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The science is settled: US liberals really are the dumbest creatures on the planet</title><link>(u'http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/?p=100093577',%20234596827L)#comment-234596827</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dwrice,  The whole&lt;br&gt;attack on Christians and their stance on creationism started with a film called&lt;br&gt;“Inherit the Wind”  about the Scopes&lt;br&gt;money trial. The film was written by a communist that distorted the facts. The schools&lt;br&gt;of Tennessee had books on Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, but did not&lt;br&gt;want to include “MAN” in the discussion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They had several reasons: 1. They thought that if schools&lt;br&gt;taught we were nothing but animals, than people would start behaving like them.&lt;br&gt;If you think you’re created by God, then you might act more Godly. (History has&lt;br&gt;proven this one correct.) 2. The science was not really settled on the&lt;br&gt;evolution of man, and still isn’t. There is still no missing link that connects&lt;br&gt;us to lower beings; there is no explanation how we alone have superior intelligence&lt;br&gt;or became self-aware; or where did our soles come from; and, 3. Why did&lt;br&gt;evolution stop? Why has there been no new species of creature created in the&lt;br&gt;last 3 million years. Why  are there no&lt;br&gt;new species of animal on the Galapagos islands?&lt;br&gt;Every animal there has relatives other places in the world. If evolution is&lt;br&gt;correct then where is the ½ bird ½ fish or something else as unique living&lt;br&gt;there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;GW theory is the same thing. &lt;br&gt;There is no collateral supporting evidence of it. No explanation of what&lt;br&gt;a “normal” world temperature is, or why its mankind’s 3% contribution to CO2&lt;br&gt;that is causing all the so called problems, and not natures 97%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Liberal do-not-think or research, they just take what some&lt;br&gt;politician tells them, and never do their own research. Conservatives are like&lt;br&gt;R. Reagan, trust but verify; they study, read, and then make their own decisions.&lt;br&gt; Conservative also have more common sense&lt;br&gt;then Liberal who want the Government to run their lives.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 04:26:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The wrong John Wayne</title><link>(u'http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2011/jun/27/the-wrong-john-wayne/',%20236170930L)#comment-236170930</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jim your comment is SICK, George W. Bush was not a serial killer. But I guess when your an insane liberal/Marxist with nothing intelligent to say, you make sick insults. You must be a Bill Mar groupy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:56:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bummer: Globull Warming May Affect California Wine Country</title><link>(u'http://www.rightwingnews.com/climate-change/bummer-globull-warming-may-affect-california-wine-country/',%20240467044L)#comment-240467044</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have you ever noticed that there is only two choices with&lt;br&gt;the Marxist pushing the Climate hoax. Its either nothing or Armageddon. Then&lt;br&gt;they say something, like do you want to take the chance.  Excuse me, assuming there right are for&lt;br&gt;argument sake,  there are uncountable&lt;br&gt;variations between those two positions, and not all of them are bad. Has any of&lt;br&gt;these pushers ever said Global warming is good or that we may be better off?  No they try to scare you with meaningless&lt;br&gt;choices that all have only one solution, MORE GOVERNMENT control of our lives.&lt;br&gt;That alone should send off waning bells.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 03:28:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There has been no global warming since 1998</title><link>(u'http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100095506/there-has-been-no-global-warming-since-1998/',%20246714116L)#comment-246714116</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It still comes down to the fact that humans only contribute 3% of the CO2 in the Atmosphere.  Which means that 97% is natural. No one has explained how our 3% is the cause of all this  so called warming.  The GW Pushers, who are actually religious fanatics, always leave water vapor out of the equation.  A 1 degree temperature change in water vapor, either doubles are eliminates, and heating affect caused by CO2.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 11:17:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The science is settled: US liberals really are the dumbest creatures on the planet</title><link>(u'http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/?p=100093577',%20246717665L)#comment-246717665</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ever notice that GW Fanatics always use insults instead of fact or reason?  If you do not believe in the Church of Liberalism and man's destruction   of the Earth, you're a hieratic, you're stupid.  Look at roha's comments, we are talking the fraud of AGW and he is talking about wars in Afghanistan  and  Ira.  When Marxist have nothing to add, they attack your grandmother.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 11:28:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The science is settled: US liberals really are the dumbest creatures on the planet</title><link>(u'http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/?p=100093577',%20246719487L)#comment-246719487</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Humans only add about 3% of the CO2 to the atmosphere, meaning that 97% is naturally occurring.  No one as yet has explained how its our 3% that is supposedly causing this warming.  In fact with CO2 increasing naturally,  how do we know that our 3% would be there if we contributed or not? &lt;br&gt;And what about water vapor?  A one degree change in water vapor is equal to all the heat created by CO2, so a 1 degree drop will eliminate all heat brought on by CO2.  In other words, man made climate change is a religion on a fact. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 11:33:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The science is settled: US liberals really are the dumbest creatures on the planet</title><link>(u'http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/?p=100093577',%20247034080L)#comment-247034080</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The worshipers on the mantle of AGW lie all the time. If as&lt;br&gt;you say man kind is more powerful than the Gods and is creating GW, then why&lt;br&gt;all the lies? Why aren’t the tide tables changing with all the rise in sea&lt;br&gt;water?  Why no explanation on how the 3%&lt;br&gt;of CO2 is causing more problems than the 97% nature puts out?  Hey petek. Karl R. Popper pointed out that&lt;br&gt;anyone can find facts to prove there theory, but its harder to prove a theory with&lt;br&gt;a prediction of an a related event. If observation shows that the predicted&lt;br&gt;effect is definitely absent, then the theory is simply refuted. For AGW to be&lt;br&gt;proven there has to be “hot spots”  somewhere.&lt;br&gt;Maybe above cities that produce a lot of CO2, maybe at the equator. But low and&lt;br&gt;behold, no one has yet found any. As for the Ice Caps melting.  In the Antarctic the  eastern ice sheet  is  larger than the United States, over two miles&lt;br&gt;thick, and has an average temperature of -60F and gets to -125F. Mathematically&lt;br&gt;for it to melt you would have to maintain a temperature of at least 68F, for&lt;br&gt;about 20 ,000 years. So how can mankind melt it in the supposed 20 years of our&lt;br&gt;AWG?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 03:27:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The science is settled: US liberals really are the dumbest creatures on the planet</title><link>(u'http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/?p=100093577',%20247046973L)#comment-247046973</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Petek, skeptics keep repeating the same facts, because&lt;br&gt;fanatics like yourself,  are not bright&lt;br&gt;enough to retain them.  You spew the same&lt;br&gt;lies that has already been analyzed and proven false. Any of which blows hole though&lt;br&gt;all your propaganda.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One thing that petek and other Alinskyites do is never give&lt;br&gt;any verifiable facts, but do attack facts by skeptics with a blustery pompous&lt;br&gt;speech on how the skeptics are  illogical&lt;br&gt;and stupid, in other words they name call and lie. The never tell us what our&lt;br&gt;motivation is, although we can tell them the political reasons for their lies,&lt;br&gt;to push socialism and steal our property rights. Oh they might say its big oil&lt;br&gt;looking for profit, but can’t explain why people who get no money form big oil&lt;br&gt;would be a skeptic. They BS by saying the science is settled, but cannot say&lt;br&gt;who or how its settled.  They always give&lt;br&gt;some unnamed, unknown, scientist that says AGW is a fact.  The only so called real facts they have are&lt;br&gt;computer models, that are so poor they cannot predict past weather patterns. Or&lt;br&gt;as they say about computer models junk in junk out, maybe today it should be&lt;br&gt;lies in AGW fanatics out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 03:46:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Duncan: States will get school testing waivers</title><link>(u'http://www.cnsnews.com/node/108285',%20280570900L)#comment-280570900</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So what if the Car companies say the CAFE standards can not work, will they get a waiver too?  I doubt it. This is just more liberalism and a way to reward failed schools and teachers. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 14:04:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ACLU battles schools over gay websites</title><link>(u'http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/aug/29/aclu-battles-schools-over-gay-websites/',%20298827656L)#comment-298827656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Frankly this is not a 1st Amendment issue for they are not blocking speech of the students, what they are doing is enforcing cultural norms and they see fit. A society has the right to Promote, Prohibit, and Permit anythings is sees as fit for the society to survive.  They can Promote Man Woman Marriage, permit civil unions, and prohibit a homosexual agendas. Frankly Homosexuals make up about 1.8% of the population, so its absurd to think that society should change to accommodate such a small minority of disturbed people.  You can tell what hypocrites the ACLU is for they fight any Christian Religion in Schools, yet promote pornography. It is sick to think that the founding fathers crated this country so a bunch of people obsessed with what between their legs would dictate what is taught in schools. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:05:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Senate blocks emergency disaster money</title><link>(u'http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/sep/23/senate-blocks-emergency-disaster-money/',%20319383584L)#comment-319383584</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where do you Liberal/Marxist come up with this stuff?  Check you history IT'S THE DEMOCRATS that create misery with the people. The Democrats lie and reuse the same talking points and drones like you all for it. I only wish the GOP had actually gotten some real cuts through. The Dems used  Solyndra for money laundering, and gave them more money then they gave 35 states for road construction. Yet we can't cut anywhere.  Michelle Obama has spent over $10million on vacations, and they tell us that the government can't cut any money.  And if the GOP want to stop giving money to rich power hungry environmental groups, you say their taking money from blind children. The Dems are corrupt and out of control and you attack the GOP for trying to make a small dent in the out of control spending. AS FOR THE TEA PARTY it is the Grass roots revolution the Marxist left has been asking for, only its the silent majority silent no more. Why do you attack patriots that want the government to live within its means, and to allow us to be free individuals? Why are you against those that want Congress and the Whitehorse to have no more power that is designated in the Constitution. Those who want socialism are saying that they are too dump to live their own life, and want some government bureaucrat that they  never met to control their life. The best thing about America is that if you hate it so much, your free to leave it. &lt;br&gt;The Constitution does in fact support Free Markets and Liberty, by telling the Government to stay out of our business. The Liberals have so corrupted out government we no longer have Capitalism, we have "Mercantilism" as shown by the bail outs, and the take over of GM to give to the unions. Stop being a drone and educate yourself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:31:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gingrich: Time to Subpoena Federal Judges - Atlantic Mobile</title><link>(u'http://m.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/10/gingrich-time-to-subpoena-federal-judges/246407/',%20330636499L)#comment-330636499</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good.  -  Thomas Sowel   &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From the comment of Cohen and other liberal/Marxist they are scared that congress may follow Gingrich's advice and stop this legislation from the bench.  The majority of liberal/Marxist policy has been forced on WE THE PEOPLE of activist judges.  They have no CONSTITUTIONAL right to use Foreign law, or create rights (like abortion) out of nothing. Gingrich makes good points and we need to encourage congress to follow his advice.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 18:52:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pay for abortion, or women &amp;#039;die on the floor&amp;#039;</title><link>(u'http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/node/161976',%20333753140L)#comment-333753140</link><description>&lt;p&gt;More woman have died from Abortion since it was legalized then died when it was not. Also, since about 1/2 the abortions are woman, abortion is the most deadly thing for woman. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:43:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Julia Louis-Dreyfus Asks Obama to Halt Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (Video) : TreeHugger</title><link>(u'http://www.treehugger.com/energy-policy/julia-louis-dreyfus-asks-obama-halt-keystone-xl-tar-sands-pipeline-video.html',%20361253720L)#comment-361253720</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just imagine how many laws, taxes, government bureaucracies,&lt;br&gt;wasted man hours, and lost jobs have been caused by the big lie of man made&lt;br&gt;global warming and destruction of the earth. &lt;br&gt;There is not one thing Julia says that can be proved.  Goebbels was right when he said “repeat a big&lt;br&gt;lie often enough and people will begin to believe it.”  If your point can only be made by lying, then it’s&lt;br&gt;not a worthwhile point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:05:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Julia Louis-Dreyfus Asks Obama to Halt Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (Video) : TreeHugger</title><link>(u'http://www.treehugger.com/energy-policy/julia-louis-dreyfus-asks-obama-halt-keystone-xl-tar-sands-pipeline-video.html',%20361259695L)#comment-361259695</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What a crock of lies, if what you say is true, why does coal&lt;br&gt;makes up for over 70% of China’s energy mix, and why is  China buying as much coal as it can get its&lt;br&gt;hands on, and ?  &lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/30/us-coal-asia-idUSTRE74T2Q220110530" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/30/us-coal-asia-idUSTRE74T2Q220110530"&gt;http://www.reuters.com/arti...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why is China&lt;br&gt;still the number one polluter in the World? &lt;br&gt;See &lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/8793269/China-population-to-become-worlds-biggest-polluters.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/8793269/China-population-to-become-worlds-biggest-polluters.html"&gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:13:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ANARCHY | Frank Miller Ink</title><link>(u'http://frankmillerink.com/2011/11/anarchy',%20362534284L)#comment-362534284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not one comment on the real terrorist in America, Jimmy&lt;br&gt;Carter, Chris Dodd, Barney Frank, Princess Nancy Pelosi,  Bill Clinton, Harry Reid, and Obama. These are&lt;br&gt;the people who have destroyed America&lt;br&gt;worse than any terrorist could.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Reid, Pelosi, and Obama&lt;br&gt;have spent more money than any one else in WORLD HISTORY. It is the vile power&lt;br&gt;hungry Liberal/Marxist/Democrat that destroyed this economy not the business&lt;br&gt;owners on Wall Street.  Carter and&lt;br&gt;Clinton pushed the Community Investment Act that MADE banks give money to&lt;br&gt;people who could not pay it back, under the disguise of Diversity and Helping Minorities,&lt;br&gt;THIS IS WHAT BROUGHT DOWN WALL STREET when the expected defaults came due. Blame&lt;br&gt;Socialism, Marxism, Democrats for our disaster not Capitalism, Business, or&lt;br&gt;Wall Street.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 18:58:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No TR: The Limits of Obama's Bully Pulpit  - 2012 Decoded</title><link>(u'http://decoded.nationaljournal.com/2011/12/e0dc111c8b0dab434486c993c31eb8be2a5176a3.php?153913',%20380725805L)#comment-380725805</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hitler also made good speeches.  Obama wants us to sacrifice, so he can spend more time on vacations and fund raising.  He has been in office 3 years and has nothing that he has done that he can be proud of. Like most tyrants he is nothing but a wind bag full of lies.  Fairness is the voice of a looser and his speech is full of these straw men. This man is bring the US to its knees and wants 4 more years to put us in the grave. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:54:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bush Speaks</title><link>(u'http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/04/10/Bush-Speaks-Bush-Tax-Cuts-Wouldnt-Be-Raised-If-Called-Something-Else',%20493941305L)#comment-493941305</link><description>&lt;p&gt; The problem with liberals is that they continue to argue yesterday's news. But since you're at it. WHAT ABOUT THE WHORE HOPPER RAPIST Clinton? He had several chances to get Bin Laden. But he sent an expensive missile to hit a camel in the butt, just to take the new off him and Monica. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:25:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Astronauts condemn NASA’s global warming endorsement</title><link>(u'http://washingtonexaminer.com/politics/washington-secrets/2012/04/astronauts-condemn-nasa%E2%80%99s-global-warming-endorsement/469366',%20494367927L)#comment-494367927</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Why would you say that? It sound like you think they are attacking the GW fraud because they are conservatives, not that they are smart men that know how to understand real facts. You have politicized the story, not them. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exton</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:14:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>