<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for MMc</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/MMc/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/MMc/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:22:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: General Hospital Spoilers: Is Nancy Lee Grahn Suspended or Fired Over Viola Davis Emmy Twitter Scandal &amp;#8211; Ryan Paevey Says No</title><link>https://www.celebdirtylaundry.com/2015/general-hospital-spoilers-is-nancy-lee-grahn-suspended-or-fired-from-gh-by-abc-over-viola-davis-emmy-twitter-scandal/#comment-2270747526</link><description>&lt;p&gt;1. Freedom of speech does not equal freedom from consequences.&lt;br&gt;2. Nothing was "taken out of context." If we all read one tweet where she was quoting someone else saying something racist and we blamed it on her, that would be taking her words out of context. The context here is Viola Davis' speech and Grahn's tweets in reaction to it. Many, many people saw all of Grahn's tweets as she posted them and before she deleted them. No context was lost. No words were taken from a larger context and misinterpreted. She said what she said and she was wrong.&lt;br&gt;3. I personally don't care whether she loses her job over it. Many have lost jobs for far lesser offenses. See #1.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:22:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: General Hospital Spoilers: Is Nancy Lee Grahn Suspended or Fired Over Viola Davis Emmy Twitter Scandal &amp;#8211; Ryan Paevey Says No</title><link>https://www.celebdirtylaundry.com/2015/general-hospital-spoilers-is-nancy-lee-grahn-suspended-or-fired-from-gh-by-abc-over-viola-davis-emmy-twitter-scandal/#comment-2270742346</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"America first amendment freedom of speech" Google it. Freedom of speech does not equal freedom from consequences. And nothing was "taken out of context." Google that, too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:17:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: General Hospital Spoilers: Is Nancy Lee Grahn Suspended or Fired Over Viola Davis Emmy Twitter Scandal &amp;#8211; Ryan Paevey Says No</title><link>https://www.celebdirtylaundry.com/2015/general-hospital-spoilers-is-nancy-lee-grahn-suspended-or-fired-from-gh-by-abc-over-viola-davis-emmy-twitter-scandal/#comment-2270739590</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What on earth do people even mean by "taken out of context"? The context was the speech and Grahn's tweets. What context was lost? None. I saw the whole thing, before she deleted the tweets. She was wrong. That doesn't necessarily mean she should lose her job, but nothing was "taken out of context." Words mean things.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:15:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: General Hospital Spoilers: Is Nancy Lee Grahn Suspended or Fired Over Viola Davis Emmy Twitter Scandal &amp;#8211; Ryan Paevey Says No</title><link>https://www.celebdirtylaundry.com/2015/general-hospital-spoilers-is-nancy-lee-grahn-suspended-or-fired-from-gh-by-abc-over-viola-davis-emmy-twitter-scandal/#comment-2270736211</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's like the words "taken out of context" are some magical salve to remove all wrongdoing from the speaker, regardless of what they actually said. smh.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:12:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Mary Sue Presents NYCC&amp;#8217;s Anti-Harrassment Policy (And We Helped!)</title><link>http://www.themarysue.com/nycc-2014-anti-harassment-policy/#comment-1593935098</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well done, and yes, the ability to report via the app is great.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 20:34:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Join me in wishing Chris Savage the happiest of birthdays!</title><link>http://www.eclectablog.com/2014/03/join-me-in-wishing-chris-savage-the-happiest-of-birthdays.html#comment-1270524431</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Happy Birthday, Chris! You rock!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 16:56:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Meet the Man Who Rescued Three Women Missing for a Decade in Cleveland</title><link>http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/05/meet-man-who-rescued-three-women-missing-decade-cleveland/64945/#comment-887567626</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This man is a hero and I hope we treat him like one. Let's also remember that Amanda Berry played a part in her own rescue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 00:50:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Boy with the Thorn in His Side: #FemFest: The Other Hidden Wound</title><link>http://www.travismamone.net/2013/02/femfest-other-hidden-wound.html#comment-814781145</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, I was not familiar with the Manic Pixie Dream Girl phenomenon. Fascinating. Great post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:35:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stubbed Out</title><link>http://josephpaulhaines.com/blog/?p=547#comment-43900481</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Go you!!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:38:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman seriously injured on Burke Gilman</title><link>http://www.fremontuniverse.com/2009/07/15/woman-seriously-injured-on-burke-gilman/#comment-12838299</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Abacaxi67: Her mother would like to speak with you if you're willing. She's very grateful and would like to thank you. I am attempting to reach you through tips@fremontuniverse.com, so if you wish, please contact them with your email address or phone number. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:31:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman seriously injured on Burke Gilman</title><link>http://www.fremontuniverse.com/2009/07/15/woman-seriously-injured-on-burke-gilman/#comment-12826189</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Abacaxi67: I just want to thank you from the bottom of my  heart for looking after my friend (and not moving her, as she did indeed have a serious neck injury).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;She is still in the hospital, but is recovering. I'll pass on the well-wishes from this page.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:52:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman seriously injured on Burke Gilman</title><link>http://www.fremontuniverse.com/2009/07/15/woman-seriously-injured-on-burke-gilman/#comment-12825628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow...you are a crass SOB, Billy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:39:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: cohitre ☺ you - Jessie  is sad because the bank would not give...</title><link>http://xn--74h.cohitre.com/post/105104092#comment-9136701</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jessie is very happy. Thank you!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Signed,&lt;br&gt;Jessie's Mom&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:07:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FOX&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;balanced&amp;#8221; analysis of the Petraeus hearings</title><link>http://new.bravenewfilms.org/blog/?p=13034#comment-5186368</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, if dems stop appearing on Fox News, the people who do watch and believe it will only be worse off. A boycott is the way to go. They need to stop calling it "news" and call it "news commentary" or perhaps "news skewed to fit our  views and fed to you with a spoon."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:10:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FOX&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;balanced&amp;#8221; analysis of the Petraeus hearings</title><link>http://new.foxattacks.com/blog/?p=941#comment-2052445</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, if dems stop appearing on Fox News, the people who do watch and believe it will only be worse off. A boycott is the way to go. They need to stop calling it "news" and call it "news commentary" or perhaps "news skewed to fit our  views and fed to you with a spoon."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:10:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>