<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for MLF</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/MLF/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/MLF/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 10:40:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: FalconStor – The Other De-Dup Option</title><link>http://wikibon.org/blog/falconstor-%e2%80%93-the-other-de-dup-option/#comment-10613926</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One alternative between DDUP and FALC would be QTM...They have bulk, the key dedupe patents, a large royalty stream from LTO tape, a "hidden asset" in their Stornext software and generated over $100 mill of ebitda in 2008. EMC already is their biggest tape customer and OEMs their dedupe technology. NTAP, is likely to lose to an all cash deal so they could also view QTM as attractive. &lt;br&gt;I am curious what others think&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MLF</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 10:40:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>