<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for LauraO</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/LauraO/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/LauraO/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 12:08:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Concerned over safety, UCLan urges journalism students not to cover EDL march</title><link>http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/541699.php#comment-105992596</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Michael,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apologies for my delay in responding to your comment - for some reason it hadn't yet appeared on our site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd be interested to know how you think the piece misrepresents the facts. I did not say that UCLan banned students from attending, but that they urged them not to attend. As you can see I have spoken to UCLan about the advice they gave and reproduced this in the article so it is a fair representation of what the advice was and what the university had told students.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 12:08:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scant press coverage for PCC chair Buscombe&amp;#8217;s libel &amp;#8216;regret&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/editor/2010/11/29/scant-press-coverage-for-pcc-chair-buscombes-libel-regret/#comment-104641730</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also reported on &lt;a href="http://Journalism.co.uk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Journalism.co.uk"&gt;Journalism.co.uk&lt;/a&gt; on Friday &lt;a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/news/pcc-apologises-in-high-court-for-chairman-s-phone-hacking-remarks/s2/a541733/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.journalism.co.uk/news/pcc-apologises-in-high-court-for-chairman-s-phone-hacking-remarks/s2/a541733/"&gt;http://www.journalism.co.uk...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 06:37:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Piano Aims To Bundle Central European Paid News Sites</title><link>http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-project-piano-aims-to-bundle-central-european-paid-news-sites/#comment-101192211</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We interviewed Tomas in September - so here's some more on Project Piano - &lt;a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/news-features/q-amp-a-tom---bella-has-ambitious-plans-for-a-one-stop-paywall-future/s5/a540340/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.journalism.co.uk/news-features/q-amp-a-tom---bella-has-ambitious-plans-for-a-one-stop-paywall-future/s5/a540340/"&gt;http://www.journalism.co.uk...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:14:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Hardie takes over as head of publishing for Northcliffe's local websites</title><link>http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/541246.php#comment-90742086</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're quite right Seamus, (you would know ;) ) - I thought there was a pin in the map for King's Lynn, but now realise it's Wisbech in Cambridgeshire.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.localpeople.co.uk/home" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.localpeople.co.uk/home"&gt;http://www.localpeople.co.u...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:19:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Planned closure of Birmingham Press and Free Press puts 12 jobs at risk</title><link>http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/541036.php#comment-90225224</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is worth noting some of the union's comments when the Press was set up as this may have informed Don's comments as well as the article above - &lt;a href="http://jonslattery.blogspot.com/2010/04/nuj-enters-birmingham-press-war-by.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://jonslattery.blogspot.com/2010/04/nuj-enters-birmingham-press-war-by.html"&gt;http://jonslattery.blogspot...&lt;/a&gt; for example, which expresses the union's support but also its concerns at the time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:59:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #WEFHamburg: Invest in a more human side, Die Zeit online editor tells Google</title><link>http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/540941.php#comment-85909536</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Wolfgang - appreciate you taking the time to comment and thanks for your additional points, it's nice to hear from the speaker first hand.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Journalism.co.uk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Journalism.co.uk"&gt;Journalism.co.uk&lt;/a&gt; also spoke with Wolfgang about display advertising on the web - we'll be posting something later today from the interview.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:49:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brighton sport journalism graduate wins Sun columnist competition</title><link>http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/540857.php#comment-84319888</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently she was one of the competition's supporters - &lt;a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/features/3103981/Six-finalist-for-The-Suns-Column-Idol-competition.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/features/3103981/Six-finalist-for-The-Suns-Column-Idol-competition.html"&gt;http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 11:51:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to: write the perfect press release for journalists</title><link>http://www.journalism.co.uk/7/articles/535287.php#comment-84250985</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You might want to drop them a line first to establish contact, but if they are relevant trade publications I should imagine they'd be happy to hear from you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 05:42:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Johnston Press promotes Henry Faure Walker to digital director role</title><link>http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/540431.php#comment-75684524</link><description>&lt;p&gt;More moves for Johnston Press directors as reported by HTFP - &lt;a href="http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/news/100907shakeup.shtml" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/news/100907shakeup.shtml"&gt;http://www.holdthefrontpage...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:38:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trinity Mirror forges hyperlocal partnerships with new community news sites</title><link>http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/540076.php#comment-69088310</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Nick, just an oversight on my part when setting it live. As you can see from other links in the piece, we are very pro linking out. We wouldn't link to the name of an organisation/website every time we mention it, but in this case I'll add them in so that readers know what we're talking about. I can assure you it's not a no-linking policy though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 05:00:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Journalism the third most untrustworthy profession, according to poll</title><link>http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/540036.php#comment-67921437</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Adam - saw the thisismoney story yesterday too, but wanted to get the details from the Co-op direct; and held it as a lot of our readers would be 'logging off' for the day as it came through. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:30:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: European Broadcasting Union meets demand from radio broadcasters for more multimedia</title><link>http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/538909.php#comment-53512379</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Mike - thanks for the clarification. I have made sure the article now makes that distinction clear.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 07:10:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Journalists criticise science community&amp;#039;s handling of &amp;#039;Climategate&amp;#039; affair</title><link>http://www.journalism.co.uk/14/articles/538756.php#comment-51040377</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just to point out that quote was reported by Shona but they are not her words. As the quote marks indicate they were said at the event by BBC environment correspondent Richard Black.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 09:42:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GQ names law student as new fashion blogger</title><link>http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/537758.php#comment-51029798</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Liam - congrats on coming third and good question. Here's a link to Noah's pieces on GQ - &lt;a href="http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/search.aspx?author=Noah+Strang" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/search.aspx?author=Noah+Strang"&gt;http://www.gq-magazine.co.u...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 08:04:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Telegraph&amp;#039;s coverage of MPs&amp;#039; expenses dominates British Press Awards</title><link>http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/538036.php#comment-41502238</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're quite right - duly amended.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 04:55:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The mobile industry&amp;#8217;s £1bn lesson: Collaborate or die</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/mediamoney/2009/01/06/the-mobile-industrys-1bn-lesson-collaborate-or-die/#comment-4934947</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In agreement with @Gordon - The NYTimes has also started opening its data/feeds up to third parties, so will be interesting to see how that pans out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:06:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Educators debate: Do journalists still need shorthand?</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/wire/3086#comment-431038</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a reporter working online and reporting on new media and online journalism, but still, I couldn't do without my shorthand training. It is a failsafe for when my laptop inevitably runs out of juice and my voice recorder lets me down.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's great for scribbling down quick quotes on the hoof and while I think journalists can get by without it, I'd rather not be without mine. It may just be me, but I find the turnaround from shorthand notes to published copy a lot quicker than any other form of notetaking too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 05:48:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Playing with Disqus</title><link>http://www.dadblog.co.uk/dadblogging/2007/10/30/playing-with-disqus/#comment-6911</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the idea of this. Chatting to someone from a firm that moderates online forums the other day, the point was raised that comments on many sites fail to interact with each other. They often appear and read as a long list of responses to the original article. Organising comments in threads forum style is  much more appealing and could encourage more focused discussion. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LauraO</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 05:51:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>