<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for KitsapPatriot</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/KitsapPatriot/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/KitsapPatriot/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:38:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: iPad 2 Graphics Much Faster Than iPad 1, Motorola Xoom</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/03/13/ipad2-faster/#comment-165681154</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd like to see the tests, considering the Xoom can do actual 1080P and the Ipad2 doesn't.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:38:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court. Says banning gay marriage is good for the federal budget. Invokes incest and marrying children.</title><link>http://americablog.com/2009/06/obama-justice-department-defends-doma.html#comment-10880022</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow did you drink the koolaid.  Seriously where are all the critical thinkers here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 03:03:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court. Says banning gay marriage is good for the federal budget. Invokes incest and marrying children.</title><link>http://americablog.com/2009/06/obama-justice-department-defends-doma.html#comment-10837208</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The lesser of two evils is still evil.  There were other choices you could have voted for.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 09:12:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court. Says banning gay marriage is good for the federal budget. Invokes incest and marrying children.</title><link>http://americablog.com/2009/06/obama-justice-department-defends-doma.html#comment-10837157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your dog can't consent.  Another typical neocon logic fail.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 09:09:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: People's Weekly World - Protests force end to border checkpoints</title><link>http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/15620/#comment-9295897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Minutemen and Jefferson County GOP are cowards.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:48:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: People's Weekly World - Protests force end to border checkpoints</title><link>http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/15620/#comment-9295137</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hate to be bearer of bad news, but I wouldn't put my trust in Obama.  Just look at the news today, he reversed his decision to release torture photos.  There are many Bush era policies he isn't reversing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:46:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kitsap prosecutor drops medical pot charges - Port Orchard Independent</title><link>http://www.portorchardindependent.com/news/42695547.html#comment-8087512</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's time for Russell Hauge to go, first off they shouldn't be prosecuting these kinds of cases in the first place wasting tax payer money.  Secondarily they can't keep track of the time wasted on these cases?  If they can't do something as simple as that, then he should not be in charge of any work force.  I'm a manager, and I know how many hours are spent on my projects.  This is the exact kind of incompetence you don't want running an office.  Government should be open and accountable.  If you get less, then they should be voted out of office.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:52:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rick Steves marijuana mission not worthwhile  - Kirkland Reporter</title><link>http://www.kirklandreporter.com/opinion/letters/39880643.html#comment-6575908</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So John are you pro-organized crime? Because organized crime is the only people that will lose out if it was decriminalized.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:00:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rick Steves lights up the marijuana conversation - Kirkland Reporter</title><link>http://www.kirklandreporter.com/news/39395709.html#comment-6575629</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Norm Dicks isn't that much better.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:50:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our marriage to ferry system should end in a divorce - Port Orchard Independent</title><link>http://www.portorchardindependent.com/opinion/37716279.html#comment-5606926</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You know I've been telling people for a while now, why don't we build a bridge.  We should do this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:55:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Students demand free speech - Whidbey News Times</title><link>http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/whidbey/wnt/news/34305334.html#comment-3996327</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are lumping all the students together, there were 2 different protests, one happened before school, the student had fliers physically taken out of her hands.  Simply put, the school will lose against a suit by the second set of students that took the time to comply with the student handbook but were still harassed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:12:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Students demand free speech - Whidbey News Times</title><link>http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/whidbey/wnt/news/34305334.html#comment-3995742</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The case does apply since this is protesting what a government agency did.  That is suspending a student on the word of another student with no proof.  What kind of message does that send?  If the student did what said, then police should have been involved.  It's counter intuitive to kick someone out on the say so of someone else with out any proof.  Taking fliers from a student from the ACLU is a suppression of speech.    So is threatening students with expulsion for wearing shirts in protest IE the analog of armbands.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:25:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Students demand free speech - Whidbey News Times</title><link>http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/whidbey/wnt/news/34305334.html#comment-3995361</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are only talking about 5 students, there were other students that were handing out flyers BEFORE school, I'm not sure why you only bring up them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh and here you go.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&amp;amp;vol=393&amp;amp;invol=503" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&amp;amp;vol=393&amp;amp;invol=503"&gt;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:55:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Students demand free speech - Whidbey News Times</title><link>http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/whidbey/wnt/news/34305334.html#comment-3994463</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If that's true, then that makes this protest even more legitimate.  Something like that wouldn't even hold up in court.  The kid needs to get a lawyer and sue the school for violating his right to an education.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:49:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Students demand free speech - Whidbey News Times</title><link>http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/whidbey/wnt/news/34305334.html#comment-3994352</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You don't seem to understand the 1st Amendment of the Constitution, or Article 1, Section 4 of the State constitution.   If there was a crime by the first student then he should have been arrested.  I don't understand the whole zero tolerance aspect even if there was a crime committed since, isn't it a bad thing not to educate kids?  Punishing someone by kicking them out of school seems self defeating at best.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:42:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Students demand free speech - Whidbey News Times</title><link>http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/whidbey/wnt/news/34305334.html#comment-3994304</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. "&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;State Constitution article 1, Section 4:&lt;br&gt;"SECTION 4 RIGHT OF PETITION AND ASSEMBLAGE. The right of petition and of the people peaceably to assemble for the common good shall never be abridged."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The school is paid for by tax payers, that makes it a Government entity, thus making it a legitimate place to protest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:39:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As a conservative, McCain left me cold - Port Orchard Independent</title><link>http://www.portorchardindependent.com/opinion/34893504.html#comment-3993234</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a pro-choice conservative, that voted for mostly republicans this election, but I did not vote for McCain or Obama.  I ran as a Republican PCO during the primary.  There was only one choice for me and it was not the Republican party.  The Republican party has been taken over by corporate socialist aka Neocons.  The Republican party needs to get back to it's roots, think Goldwater.  They need to stop going after issues that in reality shouldn't be things legislated at the federal level, if they ever want to get back in power.  They have done this to themselves.   They need to get back to being a small government party, or become a foot note in history.  They need to stop worrying about what consenting adults do in their bedrooms or on their own property as long as it's not harming someone else.  The only viable small government party now, seems to be the Libertarians.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:37:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.unrforliberty.com/2008/07/nevada-republican-state-delegates-file.html</title><link>http://www.unrforliberty.com/2008/07/nevada-republican-state-delegates-file.html#comment-953442</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Nevada GOP leadership are traitors.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:04:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best Buy Apologies For Sending Cease &amp;#038; Desist Letter</title><link>http://laughingsquid.com/best-buy-apologies-for-sending-cease-desist-letter/#comment-1810175</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You should consider a complaint with his local bar.  Dumb lawyers shouldn't practice law.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KitsapPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:06:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>