<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for KevanM</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/KevanM/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/KevanM/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 11:52:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Producers turned down $50m offer so James Bond wouldn&amp;#8217;t have to use an Android</title><link>http://www.cultofandroid.com/?p=77057#comment-2339142667</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Watch Transylvania 2 - shocking placement of a lot of Xperia nonsense.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Clearly Columbia are less precious of their own franchises!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KevanM</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 11:52:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CORRECTION: I&amp;#8217;m a victim of SpinVox Spin &amp;#8211; Sorry!</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/07/correction_im_a_victim_of_spinvox_spin_-_sorry.html#comment-13383823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have they not out-spun themselves?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The way they've expressed this 2% suggests that more than 2% of messages require human interaction - otherwise why wouldn't they just say 2% (or less).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If when they started they required 100% intervention then they are now at 2%. Presuming that they never required 100% they must be (after 98% reduction) at less than 2%. Let's call it 1%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well done Porter Novelli. We're all thinking 'more than 2%' but the actuality must be less than 2%&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KevanM</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:12:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Buy a Coke with your Vodafone Current Account</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/02/buy_a_coke_with_your_vodafone_current_account.html#comment-6256688</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There was an interesting piece on the BBC World Service programme Digital Planet about the Kenyan operator and their M-pesa payment service. Allows significnat sums ($500 I think) to be sent and received by SMS)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/digital_planet.shtml" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/digital_planet.shtml"&gt;http://www.bbc.co.uk/worlds...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If it looks like a bank, smells like a bank, etc, etc., it is a bank. Seems like a great idea.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KevanM</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:29:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The MIR iPhone App is released!</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/the_mir_iphone_app_is_released.html#comment-5163750</link><description>&lt;p&gt;a 3G 16GB with 2.2&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have restarted but exactly the same issue. Other downloads have worked fine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Very odd.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KevanM</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:46:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The MIR iPhone App is released!</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/the_mir_iphone_app_is_released.html#comment-5162207</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have downloaded it but it doesn't want to work. Start it, launch screen appears, wait, wait, crashes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'll try restarting phone see if that helps.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KevanM</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:55:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jonathan Jensen on Thursday Ã¢â‚¬â€œ Mobile as a landline minutes stealer</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/jonathan_jensen_on_thursday_mobile_as_a_landline_minutes_stealer.html#comment-5137158</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is some conflicting data in the Ofcom statement:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;'... with fixed voice, which still accounted for 148 billion minutes last year, down only 10% from 165 minutes in 2002.'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;'However, fixed-line voice has remained resilient, with overall outbound minutes falling by just 2% to 148 billion minutes in 2007'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I believe the right number is 10% (of all minutes). For fixed to mobile minutes it is much higher and so value is declining faster. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KevanM</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 06:03:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The best &amp;#8216;mobile&amp;#8217; handset on the planet</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/10/the_best_mobile_handset_on_the_planet.html#comment-3202407</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, a Nokia 2110. In the end we go back to where we started. So much for progress. Looking forward to an 8800!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KevanM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:02:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>