<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for JustForThis</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/JustForThis/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/JustForThis/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 20:22:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Halo 3: ODST Vs. M.A.G: Final Round</title><link>http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Halo-3-ODST-Vs-M-A-G-Final-Round-19119.html#comment-14503119</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm no Xbox 360 fanboy, but if there's one thing I can say about Halo - it's really fun. Most of the PlayStation 3 games I've played come no where close to the amount of fun in Halo. Ratchet &amp;amp; Clank, LittleBigPlanet and perhaps Uncharted 2: Among Thieves, now that it has a wonderful multiplayer part added on. But other than that, games like Resistance, Resistance 2, Killzone 2 etc. They lasted me for about a month or so. They looked amazing, but I didn't have much fun with them after a while. Now, I'm not saying MAG will be like those games, but what's stopping me from thinking it could be? 256 players doesn't justify anything, if Halo 3: ODST is as fun as the previous installments in the series, and if MAG just says 256 players online, to me, Halo 3: ODST will be much more fun and will have the better replay value.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In my opinion, the best multiplayer game coming for the PlayStation 3 at the last quarter or so of the year, that I can be assured will be really fun, is Uncharted 2: Among Thieves. If Ratchet &amp;amp; Clank: A Crack in Time gets multiplayer, too, then that'll probably be the most fun I will have on my PlayStation 3. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JustForThis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 20:22:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>