<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of Josh_Peterson</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Josh_Peterson/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Josh_Peterson/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:56:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: An &amp;#8216;ornery&amp;#8217; judicial view of Mich. sex offender laws</title><link>(u'http://michiganmessenger.com/32878/an-ornery-judicial-view-of-mich-sex-offender-laws',%2028921877L)#comment-28921877</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it should go further and go up to at least age 25.  I was told by an attorney that age 30 is the new 20.  I know when I was a teen I only dated guys in their 20's.  Period.  Now they'd all be sex offenders because of a kiss!  (and I was the one who wanted the kiss, never pressured into one).  It's amazing who is on the registry now.  It's a joke and everyone seems to know it except the legislators! I wish someone would go back to the Supreme Court and PROVE it IS punitive and not regulatory - then these fellas (mostly fellas) would have a chance at life again! (I'm speaking of non-violent offenses like online chat with a teen, tinkling in the woods or on the side of the highway, consensual sex or consensual kissing, etc.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">reallyconcernedparent</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:56:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>