<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for JennieB</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/JennieB/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/JennieB/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 14:42:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;This was thought out&amp;#8217;: Joe Scarborough shouts down Mika for questioning Trump&amp;#8217;s diplomatic skills</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/this-was-thought-out-joe-scarborough-shouts-down-mika-for-questioning-trumps-diplomatic-skills/#comment-3134543424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And today we read that Trump humiliated and "demoralized" the Australian PM with his rudeness and "well thought out" words toward one of our strongest allies, leaving John McCain to clean up his mess. We also heard from the U.S. Military that he ordered a covert strike without "sufficient intelligence, ground support, or back-up preparations."  &lt;br&gt;Now who looks like a fool, Joe.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 14:42:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The &amp;#8220;Flip Or Flop&amp;#8221; Drama Just Got Darker</title><link>https://dlisted.com/2017/01/26/the-flip-or-flop-drama-just-got-darker/#comment-3123480125</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Almost as big as her teeth!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 12:35:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 
					OK! Exclusive: Caitlyn Jenner Is Breaking Down Over Her Shape And Thinks She Looks Like A Refrigerator!
				</title><link>http://okmagazine.com/photos/caitlyn-jenner-unhappy-body-shape/photo/1001300766/#comment-2197259730</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh please.  Caitlin is still a man.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:57:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bruce Jenner tells Diane Sawyer -- I've Always Had the Soul of a Woman (TV)</title><link>http://www.tmz.com/2015/04/24/bruce-jenner-diane-sawyer-interview-woman-transgender#comment-1987515171</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you always had the soul of a woman, why did you keep getting married and lying to the women you married?  After your first divorce, why didn't you remain single instead of continuing marry women under false pretenses?  I support anyone's desire to transition into who they really are, but I don't support repetitive liars and frauds.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 18:30:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: "Grey's Anatomy" Fans Are VERY Angry After Shocking Death -- Exiting Cast Member Speaks!</title><link>http://www.toofab.com/2015/04/24/greys-anatomy-death-spoilers/#comment-1987402374</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I fast-forwarded through the last 40 minutes of that horrible episode and consider it to be the series finale because I am done with it.  Grey's is nothing without Derek and Meredith.  I would have preferred a good finale instead that crap ending, but that would not be possible with Shonda Rhimes in charge.  Good riddance&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 16:57:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zimmerman&amp;#8217;s Request For Acquittal Denied</title><link>http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/zimmermans-request-for-acquittal-denied.php#comment-953326790</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 20:41:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zimmerman&amp;#8217;s Request For Acquittal Denied</title><link>http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/zimmermans-request-for-acquittal-denied.php#comment-953326515</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He may be found NT, but it will be an injustice because he stalked and murdered an innocent, unarmed kid and then lied about what happened.  I think that all female jury will be smart enough to see the truth and find him guilty.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 20:41:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Axelrod: Leak Probes Won't Intimidate 'Responsible' Media Organizations </title><link>http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/axelrod-leak-probes-wont-intimidate-responsible-media-organizations#comment-915092190</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pincus is spot on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 11:41:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Axelrod: Leak Probes Won't Intimidate 'Responsible' Media Organizations </title><link>http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/axelrod-leak-probes-wont-intimidate-responsible-media-organizations#comment-915091074</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Axelrod and Walter Pincus are both right.  Journalists would not be legally compromised or caught up in legal investigations if they didn't accept information from lawbreakers. Leaking/sharing classified or top secret information is against the law and compromises our national security. If journalmists choose to use illegally obtained information from a lawbreaker (who is not a whistle blower), they are complicit.  Maybe journalists should start acting like responsible news reporters instead of the tabloid journalists they have become in recent years.&lt;br&gt;Contrary to what they seem to believe, journalmists are NOT ABOVE THE LAW.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 11:40:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Teacher questioned after using Obama assassination as example in geometry class</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/05/18/teacher-questioned-instructing-students-assassinate-obama/#comment-50904937</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They're going to have a "long conversation" with him?  How about a short one, "YOU'RE FIRED!"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 11:41:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Suspect should never have boarded plane: Mayor Bloomberg</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/05/suspect-plane-mayor-bloomberg/#comment-48379370</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He had just been put on the no fly list.  He was identified on Monday and put on the list.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 14:22:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Suspect should never have boarded plane: Mayor Bloomberg</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/05/suspect-plane-mayor-bloomberg/#comment-48379007</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And your police officers "allowed" him to park his SUV with the hazard lights on.  It was a vendor that brought it to the attention of YOUR police officers.  The Feds actually caught the guy within 50 hours.  If the guy hadn't been so hapless at bomb making, you could have had a huge tragedy, Mayor.  So I guess we could ask, why was he allowed to abandon a vehicle in Times Square with the hazard lights on?  Why didn't any police offers notice it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW,  are you still afraid of trying terrorists in NYC?  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 14:19:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Arizona &amp;#8216;birther&amp;#8217; bill forces Obama to show birth certificate</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/04/20/arizona-bill-force-obama-show-birth-certificate/#comment-45838976</link><description>&lt;p&gt;President Obama is the one who signed the law recently allowing wackjobs like yourself to bring loaded firearms into state parks.  If he hadn't signed that law, you wouldn't have been allowed to bring your guns to the Virginia protest.  So please do tell how your 'freedoms" have been taken away, exactly?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You people are either pathetically misinformed or willfully ignorant.  And I'm not sure which is worse.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:02:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tea Partiers: Obama&amp;#8217;s a Muslim because he takes his shoes off</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/04/05/tea-party-leader-obama-muslim-shoes/#comment-43385361</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ROFL.  Idiots.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:00:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Conservative View host attempts to justify Tea Party rage</title><link>http://rawstory.com/2009/2010/03/hasselbeck-justifies-tea-party-rage/#comment-41102777</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No wonder Hasselbeck is a Republican.  She's far to stupid and hateful to be a Democrat.  Defending people who called membes of Congress the n-word, and faggot, and spit on them?  That's lovely Elizabeth, and so totally you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:14:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Eagles on tour</title><link>http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/morning/the-eagles-on-tour-20100319#comment-40723893</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I miss the Dixie Chicks.  Natalie looks happy and relaxed.  I can't wait until she get's the urge to record again!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:30:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HRC: Obama gets until 2017 to keep his promises, and don't criticize him until then</title><link>http://americablog.com/2009/10/hrc-obama-gets-until-2017-to-keep-his.html#comment-19705510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As a lifelong Democrat is who sick to death of your endless Obama bashing, bahaahahah Arvavosis.  Suck on it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Personally, I believe Obama has until 2012, not 2017.  But clearly he has more than the 30 days you gave him.   I'm thrilled to see HRC disagree with your incessant pout. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:11:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Baucus offers "sweeping universal-coverage plan"</title><link>http://americablog.com/2008/11/baucus-offers-sweeping-universal.html#comment-3721465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nothing like auto insurance.  If you can't afford auto insurance, you can opt out by choosing not to drive.    What happens if you can't afford the health coverage but don't qualify for assistance?   Your wages get garnished or you are charged penalty fees that you can't afford?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obama's plan is much better.  People want health coverage and they'll buy it, if it's made affordable and coverage is good.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:14:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Baucus offers "sweeping universal-coverage plan"</title><link>http://americablog.com/2008/11/baucus-offers-sweeping-universal.html#comment-3721382</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly.  If the government isn't paying the premium, they cannot and should not force people to purchase it.  This is not not an issue where the government has to mandate something in order to "protect the general public" as with auto insurance.  In which case you can opt out by choosing not to drive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If the government wants to force people to have health insurance, they can pay for it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:09:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Baucus offers "sweeping universal-coverage plan"</title><link>http://americablog.com/2008/11/baucus-offers-sweeping-universal.html#comment-3721343</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mandating health coverage is the wrong approach and I do not support it.  Everyone who can even remotely afford health insurance will get it.  But to force people to pay for health insurance before paying their mortgage or rent, if they can't afford to do both, is incidious and wrong.  These people oftentimes make enough money so that they don't qualify for assistance, yet they still can't make ends meet and, I for one, would not put my health insurance before my mortgage or food.   That is what I didn't like about Hillary's plan and I don't like about this one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:06:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hillary speaks about Palin</title><link>http://americablog.com/2008/09/hillary-speaks-about-palin.html#comment-2503541</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To be fair, the press made a pretty big deal over Edward's hair and expensive haircut, they ridiculed Gore for gaining weight and wearing a beard, and everyone has joked about Romney's good looks -- the press, the other candidates and the public.   If Romney were female, he'd say that was sexist.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, I distinctly recall Hillary saying during stump speech how sometimes she's late because it takes her so much longer to get ready because she has to do her hair and makeup and  the guys just get dressed go!    If you don't want people commenting on your femininity, then don't talk about your femininity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just saying . . . .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 19:50:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain lied about Palin's "energy expertise"</title><link>http://americablog.com/2008/09/mccain-lied-about-palins-energy.html#comment-2354651</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought so too, initially, but it's listed as a DFA ad.  Brave New Pac did do the the 4 minute video of this guy so maybe DFA worked with them to edit it down to 30 sec and put it on the air.   ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:37:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain lied about Palin's "energy expertise"</title><link>http://americablog.com/2008/09/mccain-lied-about-palins-energy.html#comment-2353755</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have any of you seen this new ad from DFA?   It's brutal, and it's on the air in battleground states.  So, far I have heard from people in NM, MO, NJ who have seen this on TV  today.  McLiar is not gonna be happy!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.democracyforamerica.com/contribution_pages/66" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.democracyforamerica.com/contribution_pages/66"&gt;https://www.democracyforame...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:34:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain Puts Foreign Countries First, Says Obama</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/5714/mccain-puts-foreign-countries-first-says-obama#comment-2328398</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For someone who was once considered an honorable man, John McCain has proven us all wrong.  He is now a dishonorable man who has become an habitual liar, and embraces the same character assassination techniques that Karl Rove used against him in 2000.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;His wife and his VP candidate lie with impunity as well.  They're exactly like the Bush administration.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 12:10:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Exploiting 9/11?</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/exploiting-911.html#comment-2152387</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there ANYTHING this woman won't lie about?   She's not a pitbull in lipstick, she's Dick Cheney in lipstick.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JennieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:09:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>