<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for JeffMowatt</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/JeffMowatt/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/JeffMowatt/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 03:58:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Purpose in Action: The Secret to Building and Sustaining High-Performance Organizations</title><link>https://www.greenbiz.com/node/112693#comment-4404566437</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As a practitioner of purpose-driven business I shared our worlk with McKinsey in Long Term Capitalism . As we argued in a 'Marshall Plan' for Ukraine 2006:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"An inherent assumption about capitalism is that profit is&lt;br&gt; defined only in terms of monetary gain. This assumption is virtually &lt;br&gt;unquestioned in most of the world. However, it is not a valid &lt;br&gt;assumption. Business enterprise, capitalism, must be measured in terms &lt;br&gt;of monetary profit. That rule is not arguable. A business enterprise &lt;br&gt;must make monetary profit, or it will merely cease to exist. That is an &lt;br&gt;absolute requirement. But it does not follow that this must necessarily &lt;br&gt;be the final bottom line and the sole aim of the enterprise. How this &lt;br&gt;profit is used is another question. It is commonly assumed that profit &lt;br&gt;will enrich enterprise owners and investors, which in turn gives them &lt;br&gt;incentive to participate financially in the enterprise to start with.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"That, however, is not the only possible outcome for use &lt;br&gt;of profits. Profits can be directly applied to help resolve a broad &lt;br&gt;range of social problems: poverty relief, improving childcare, seeding &lt;br&gt;scientific research for nationwide economic advancement, improving &lt;br&gt;communications infrastructure and accessibility, for examples – the &lt;br&gt;target objectives of this particular project plan. The same financial &lt;br&gt;discipline required of any conventional for-profit business can be &lt;br&gt;applied to projects with the primary aim of improving socioeconomic &lt;br&gt;conditions. Profitability provides money needed to be self-sustaining &lt;br&gt;for the purpose of achieving social and economic objectives such as &lt;br&gt;benefit of a nation’s poorest, neediest people. In which case, the &lt;br&gt;enterprise is a social enterprise."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 03:58:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reforms in exchange for investments – EU сommission is starting to implement Marshall plan for a Ukraine</title><link>http://euromaidanpress.com/2018/05/05/building-a-contract-for-ukraine-eu-commission-is-starting-to-implement-marshall/#comment-4256228962</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A decade ago this month the EU were introduced to a 'Marshall Plan' for Ukraine in the 2008 citizen consultation. Comminssioner Michel Barnier, then VP of the EPP read it in 2012. &lt;a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20090202180139/http://www.european-citizens-consultations.eu/uk/proposal/2012" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://web.archive.org/web/20090202180139/http://www.european-citizens-consultations.eu/uk/proposal/2012"&gt;http://web.archive.org/web/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2018 13:33:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Growth vs Good Growth: How to Protect the Earth and Have a Vibrant, More Equitable Market Economy</title><link>http://evonomics.com/growth-protect-earth-market-economy-peter-barnes/#comment-4192444384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Economics for Ecology conferences at Sumy gave us the opportunity to repeat the call for a new economic system which we all get to invent. The second presentation was the treatise for a people-centered approach where value is measured in terms of human beings rather than money imagined into existence as debt:  &lt;a href="http://wp.p-ced.org/projects/ukraine/sumy-economics-for-ecology/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://wp.p-ced.org/projects/ukraine/sumy-economics-for-ecology/"&gt;http://wp.p-ced.org/project...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 03:13:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Christian, What’s Your Impact in the Business Arena?</title><link>https://tifwe.org/christian-whats-your-impact-in-the-business-arena/#comment-4059076531</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In 2009 with Caritas in Veritate, Pope Benedict wrote of the need for ethics which are people-centered. The founder of people-centered economics lost his life in his efforts to help vulnerable children in Ukraine:  &lt;a href="https://medium.com/@peoplecentred/economics-for-the-common-good-and-the-vatican-985db729a604" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://medium.com/@peoplecentred/economics-for-the-common-good-and-the-vatican-985db729a604"&gt;https://medium.com/@peoplec...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 02:49:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Toward a generative economy</title><link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/marjorie-kelly/toward-generative-economy#comment-2983143905</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've not been aware of the term generative business but it appears to be much the same as the social purpose approach where social and environmental benefit are the primary objective. I described this to McKinsey several years ago from the perspective of a practitioner, as The New Bottom Line &lt;a href="http://www.managementexchange.com/story/re-imagining-capitalism-new-bottom-line" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.managementexchange.com/story/re-imagining-capitalism-new-bottom-line"&gt;http://www.managementexchan...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 13:23:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: British experts say Ukraine has to help itself before asking for help from West within 'Marshall Plan'</title><link>http://www.kyivpost.com/article/content/ukraine-politics/british-experts-say-ukraine-has-to-help-itself-before-asking-for-help-from-west-within-marshall-plan-418793.html#comment-2830693923</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As the British authors of 'Microeconomic Development and Social Enterprise' a 'Marshall Plan for Ukraine, I know there have been many calls for such a strategy, even in Maidan's 2014 appeal to the EU.  Who these "British experts" are would be interesting to know.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 13:24:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Base Economics on Human Nature, Not Homo Economicus</title><link>http://evonomics.com/its-time-to-base-economics-on-human-nature/#comment-2765065629</link><description>&lt;p&gt;“Economics, and indeed human civilization, can only be &lt;br&gt;measured and calibrated in terms of human beings.  Everything in &lt;br&gt;economics has to be adjusted for people, first, and abandoning the &lt;br&gt;illusory numerical analyses that inevitably put numbers ahead of people,&lt;br&gt; capitalism ahead of democracy, and degradation ahead of compassion.”  That was the beginning of people-centered economics:  &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/38" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/38"&gt;http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/38&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 14:38:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We&amp;#8217;re Not as Selfish as Economists Think We Are. Here&amp;#8217;s the Proof.</title><link>http://evonomics.com/not-selfish-economists-think-heres-proof-genuinely-good/#comment-2753334744</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When the FTSE took a dive on Friday, I thought of the words of Pope Francis pointing out that a fall in stock markets was more tragic than the fate of those disposed of as if they were trash.  There are other perspectives &lt;a href="https://www.2degreesnetwork.com/groups/2degrees-community/resources/compassion-fourth-bottom-line_2/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.2degreesnetwork.com/groups/2degrees-community/resources/compassion-fourth-bottom-line_2/"&gt;https://www.2degreesnetwork...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 13:21:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Rise of Finance and The Fall of American Business</title><link>http://evonomics.com/the-rise-of-finance-and-the-fall-of-american-business/#comment-2737246705</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"What is not guesswork is that the broken – again – &lt;br&gt;capitalist system, be it traditional economics theories in the West or &lt;br&gt;hybrid communism/capitalism in China, is sitting in a world where the &lt;br&gt;existence of human beings is at grave risk, and it's no longer alarmist &lt;br&gt;to say so.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The question at hand is what to do next, and how to do &lt;br&gt;it.  We all get to invent whatever new economics system that comes next,&lt;br&gt; because we must."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.managementexchange.com/story/re-imagining-capitalism-new-bottom-line" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.managementexchange.com/story/re-imagining-capitalism-new-bottom-line"&gt;http://www.managementexchan...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 02:02:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Want to Kill Your Economy? Have MBA Programs Churn out Takers Not Makers.</title><link>http://evonomics.com/want-to-kill-your-economy-have-mba-programs/#comment-2718216647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When Geof Mulgan of Nesta wrote a book about the future of capitalism  he used locusts and bees as metaphors for the predators and pollinators of our economy&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Capitalism has always comprised both predators and &lt;br&gt;creators (locusts and bees) and if the recent financial crisis taught us&lt;br&gt; anything, it is that crises occur when capitalism’s predators become &lt;br&gt;too powerful – extracting value rather than creating it."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/capitalism-purpose-vs-profit-pollinators-predators-jeff-mowatt" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/capitalism-purpose-vs-profit-pollinators-predators-jeff-mowatt"&gt;https://www.linkedin.com/pu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 02:07:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Finance Behaves like a Parasite Toward the Economy</title><link>http://evonomics.com/how-financial-parasites-and-debt-bondage/#comment-2709788187</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Capitalism has always comprised both predators and creators&lt;br&gt; (locusts and bees) and if the recent financial crisis taught us &lt;br&gt;anything, it is that crises occur when capitalism’s predators become too&lt;br&gt; powerful – extracting value rather than creating it." said Geof Mulgan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Academics and business leaders who imagine a new form of capitalism share the belief that business should contribute more than it extracts from society. Here's what happens when its put into practice:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/capitalism-purpose-vs-profit-pollinators-predators-jeff-mowatt" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/capitalism-purpose-vs-profit-pollinators-predators-jeff-mowatt"&gt;https://www.linkedin.com/pu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 04:28:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Is the Role of Morality in a Capitalist Economy?</title><link>http://evonomics.com/role-of-morality-in-a-capitalist-economy/#comment-2709782947</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Capitalism is the most powerful economic engine ever &lt;br&gt;devised, yet it came up short with its classical, inherent profit-motive&lt;br&gt; as being presumed to be the driving force. Under that presumption, all &lt;br&gt;is good in the name of profit became the prevailing winds of &lt;br&gt;international economies — thereby giving carte blanche to the notion &lt;br&gt;that greed is good because it is what has driven capitalism. The 1996 &lt;br&gt;paper merely took exception with the assumption that personal profit, &lt;br&gt;greed, and the desire to amass as much money and property on a personal &lt;br&gt;level as possible are inherent and therefore necessary aspects of any &lt;br&gt;capitalist endeavour. While it is in fact very normal for that to be the&lt;br&gt; case, it simply does not follow that it must be the case." &lt;a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/greed-good-vs-people-centered-economics-jeff-mowatt" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/greed-good-vs-people-centered-economics-jeff-mowatt"&gt;https://www.linkedin.com/pu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 04:20:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It’s Not What a Business Does, But How They Do It</title><link>http://unreasonable.is/its-not-what-a-business-does-but-how-they-do-it/#comment-2697844947</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Corey, as a software business our efforts were directed at the primary goal of transitioning children from institutions to loving family homes. It began with a business model for social good, a people-centered business. If you Google 'What is the Purpose of Business?" you should be able to find it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 02:03:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why most big companies lack a true higher purpose</title><link>http://www.managementtoday.co.uk//opinion/1395356/why-big-companies-lack-true-higher-purpose/#comment-2696068413</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While I agree entirely with what the article says about purpose wash in big business, from the perspective of running a purpose driven small business it is also true that PR firms move in to dominate and control the debate,to the detriment of those who are walking the talk.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 04:46:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to stay human</title><link>https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/transformation/how-to-stay-human/#comment-2694915793</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Profit over people as Noam Chomsky described it, yet there was little interest in economics measured and calibrated in human terms, people over profit &lt;a href="http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/282" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/282"&gt;http://www.p-ced.com/1/node...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 13:06:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dumbest Business Idea Ever. The Myth of Maximizing Shareholder Value</title><link>http://evonomics.com/maximizing-shareholder-value-dumbest-idea/#comment-2579841647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lynne Stout's book validated an assertion made about doing business for social benefit . &lt;a href="http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/112" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/112"&gt;http://www.p-ced.com/1/node...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2016 13:01:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sadiq Khan gets social enterprise</title><link>http://www.progressonline.org.uk/2016/02/11/sadiq-khan-gets-social-enterprise/#comment-2538125380</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interestingly it was Saddiq Khan's constituency where I introduced our social enterprise in 2004 when we called on goverment support for business which takes the bottom line past profit to people &lt;a href="http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/30" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/30"&gt;http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/30&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:15:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is This the Future of Economics?</title><link>http://evonomics.com/is-this-the-future-of-econ/#comment-2496146070</link><description>&lt;p&gt;20 years ago, it was almost heresy to suggest that capitalism was flawed. Bill Clinton, then US president was warned &lt;a href="http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/60" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/60"&gt;http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/60&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 13:35:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Modernising Ukraine</title><link>https://opendemocracy.net/od-russia/fabian-burkhardt/modernising-ukraine#comment-2078187656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ursino, One of the other peers involved, Lord Risby had been introduced to the 'Marshall Plan' after publication online in 2007, by a staff member of the British Ukrainian Society. The introduction was also forwarded to John Grogan, chairman of the APPG on Ukraine.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2015 02:48:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:  
            
        
            Ursala K. Le Guin's Call to Authors
        
    
        </title><link>http://www.yesmagazine.org/happiness/ursala-k-le-guins-call-to-authors/#comment-2063061129</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Capitalism is the most powerful economic engine ever &lt;br&gt;devised, yet it came up short with its classical, inherent profit-motive&lt;br&gt; as being presumed to be the driving force. Under that presumption, all &lt;br&gt;is good in the name of profit became the prevailing winds of &lt;br&gt;international economies — thereby giving carte blanche to the notion &lt;br&gt;that greed is good because it is what has driven capitalism. The 1996 &lt;br&gt;paper merely took exception with the assumption that personal profit, &lt;br&gt;greed, and the desire to amass as much money and property on a personal &lt;br&gt;level as possible are inherent and therefore necessary aspects of any &lt;br&gt;capitalist endeavour. While it is in fact very normal for that to be the&lt;br&gt; case, it simply does not follow that it must be the case."  &lt;a href="http://www.managementexchange.com/story/re-imagining-capitalism-new-bottom-line" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.managementexchange.com/story/re-imagining-capitalism-new-bottom-line"&gt;http://www.managementexchan...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 01:26:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A call to action for the common good - Welcome to a story of hope</title><link>http://www.calltoactionforthecommongood.org.uk/post/118769034504#comment-2051898290</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good to find you - here's P-CED:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Our social purpose is poverty relief and childcare reform in the former &lt;br&gt;Soviet Union.  Core framework is straightforward: to build bridges of &lt;br&gt;friendship based on common ground for the common good in the former &lt;br&gt;Soviet bloc.  We firmly believe that this "soft power" approach to &lt;br&gt;international relations is inevitably the only solid ground for &lt;br&gt;establishing and building understanding, good will and peace.  We have &lt;br&gt;therefore pursued that strategy from the beginning of P-CED.  In this &lt;br&gt;regard we consider that Peace is our Business."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.p-ced.com/1/about" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.p-ced.com/1/about"&gt;http://www.p-ced.com/1/about&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 13:49:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is social enterprise becoming a reactionary force?</title><link>https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/transformation/is-social-enterprise-becoming-reactionary-force/#comment-2025120292</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What I noted about Benefit Corporations was that they advocate amendment to the corporate charter declaring non-stockholder interest. It was in North Carolina 19 years ago that this was proposed in a form know as People-Centered Economic Development which made the case for business putting people before profit maximisation. Hence the name. What it also argued is that it was within the law to do this, with consent of directors and stockholders, rather than "doing well by doing good". I now ask where human rights are concerned, should we not disregard law that denies this? &lt;a href="http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/408" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/408"&gt;http://www.p-ced.com/1/node...&lt;/a&gt;  .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 15:12:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Five ways to deal with a full blown Conservative Government | Blog | Class: Centre for Labour and Social Studies</title><link>http://classonline.org.uk/blog/item/five-ways-to-deal-with-a-full-blown-conservative-government#comment-2015402522</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is exactly what has been happening since calling on Labour to put people before profit &lt;a href="http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/416" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/416"&gt;http://www.p-ced.com/1/node...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2015 11:25:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Former Md. Congressman: ‘We Need a Marshall Plan’ for Baltimore :: Grabien - The Multimedia Marketplace</title><link>https://grabien.com/story.php?id=27024#comment-1995482151</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You do indeed. here's someone who had this in mind &lt;a href="https://www.2degreesnetwork.com/groups/2degrees-community/resources/could-marshall-plan-restore-baltimore/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.2degreesnetwork.com/groups/2degrees-community/resources/could-marshall-plan-restore-baltimore/"&gt;https://www.2degreesnetwork...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 03:30:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Russian aggression in Ukraine and the Baltics</title><link>http://www.theeuropean-magazine.com/andrius-kubilius/9685-russian-aggression-in-ukraine-and-the-baltics#comment-1867361880</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps Europeans should be asking their MEPs why Ukraine and Maidan never go the 'Marshall Plan' they called for? &lt;a href="http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/260" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/260"&gt;http://www.p-ced.com/1/node...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffMowatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2015 02:51:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>