<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of Jallenrule</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Jallenrule/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Jallenrule/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:10:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Firefox 3 Issues</title><link>('https://disqus.com/home/discussion/disqus/firefox_3_issues/',%20254472L)#comment-254472</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i have the same problem with regular old firefox 2.0&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 06:32:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 3 Issues</title><link>('https://disqus.com/home/discussion/disqus/firefox_3_issues/',%20254492L)#comment-254492</link><description>&lt;p&gt;it seems to be specific to 2.0.0.12 which is what 90% of people use. 2.0.0.11 worked fine.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:05:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changes to the commenting system</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/changes-to-the.html',%20254680L)#comment-254680</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm leaving this inaugural (okay, first) comment using Firefox 2.0.0.12.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm already logged on, even though the UI doesn't indicate that I am. I'll fill in my name and e-mail address (any old gibberish will do), and then click submit. (Don't check the verify button.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 09:43:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changes to the commenting system</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/changes-to-the.html',%20254684L)#comment-254684</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm leaving this reply with IE. It works better with IE, which proves that IE is good for something. But I'll still be sticking with my Firefox! If you happen to make things work in Firefox, let me know. Maybe one of my add-ons is conflicting?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 09:46:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changes to the commenting system</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/changes-to-the.html',%20254689L)#comment-254689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Daniel -- thanks for stopping by. I had a machine with 2.0.0.11 on it, and it worked fine -- then I upgraded to 2.0.0.12 and it didn't work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for checking in -- overall I love the system. It was incredibly easy to integrate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Jed&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 09:47:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Success! CBS News poll shows Obama speech well-received by voters</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/success-cbs-new.html',%20257604L)#comment-257604</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I agree that in general it's good to remain cautious, but also&lt;br&gt;remember InsiderAdvantage in particular is completely untrustworthy. Check&lt;br&gt;this out:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pollster.com/blogs/the_insider_advantage_crosstab.php" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.pollster.com/blogs/the_insider_advantage_crosstab.php"&gt;http://www.pollster.com/blo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:36:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: "A More Perfect Union" - 3.5 million views and counting</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/a-more-perfect.html',%20259936L)#comment-259936</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's very highly rated on YouTube, and it's just another confirmation. It is&lt;br&gt;not sufficient by itself to prove the point. For that, you look at the CBS&lt;br&gt;poll, for example.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Disqus &amp;lt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:03:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Success! CBS News poll shows Obama speech well-received by voters</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/success-cbs-new.html',%20260193L)#comment-260193</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No problem kairos -- thanks for stopping by, even if we're not on the same&lt;br&gt;page. :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW, I think there's another study showing IA's unreliability -- i'll try&lt;br&gt;and find it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:36:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No commitment from Clinton to North Carolina debate</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/no-commitment-f.html',%20261664L)#comment-261664</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nitpicking is great! Don't worry.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When I wrote this I was thinkign about that debate (you're referring to the&lt;br&gt;LA one, right?)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't think she moderated -- I think she was just sitting at the table&lt;br&gt;with the politico reporter. I think Blitzer moderated.&lt;br&gt;On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Disqus &amp;lt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 05:58:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No commitment from Clinton to North Carolina debate</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/no-commitment-f.html',%20261666L)#comment-261666</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you're right -- she moderated the austin debate. Wow -- I can't believe I&lt;br&gt;forgot that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Disqus &amp;lt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 06:00:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Daily Kos is on (orange) fire today</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/daily-kos-is-on.html',%20268669L)#comment-268669</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOL. More than welcome! It was a great diary.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:04:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dishonesty? Delusion? At this point, does it even matter?</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/dishonesty-delu.html',%20269542L)#comment-269542</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lol...i'm not sure that would be enugh!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:36:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &lt;em&gt;Hillary In Tuzla: The Tale of Bosnian Sniper Fire&lt;/em&gt; -- Video gallery and archives</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/hillaryintuzla.html',%20271449L)#comment-271449</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thank! i had only heard the audio.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:01:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Caught lying, Clinton falsely attacked Obama for lying</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/caught-lying-cl.html',%20279199L)#comment-279199</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOL, sorry Jallenrule. Hopefully the next time I do it will be when she's&lt;br&gt;endorsing him for President!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:52:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did the Clintons just release their tax returns?</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/did-the-clinton.html',%20281255L)#comment-281255</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gosh darn it! LOL.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:56:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I know I said don't pay attention to tracking polls...</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/i-know-i-said-d.html',%20281625L)#comment-281625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wow! that's bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 03:53:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Looking good in Texas</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/looking-good-in.html',%20281627L)#comment-281627</link><description>&lt;p&gt;he very well might have won, certainly it would have been closer. 65k-100k votes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and in MS, he lost a net 10 delegates because of the MS Republicans for Clinton&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 03:54:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cross-over voting in Ohio, revisited</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/cross-over-voti.html',%20281668L)#comment-281668</link><description>&lt;p&gt;RE: Limbaugh - True dat.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I like a national system of runoffs, spaced out over say a 3-4 month period,&lt;br&gt;kind of like american idol. if a candidate got 50%+ in 2 straight runoffs,&lt;br&gt;then the process would end.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;but even if we just got rid of superdelegates, the current system would be&lt;br&gt;tolerable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 04:53:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A leading indicator of a doomed candidacy</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/leading-indicat.html',%20283132L)#comment-283132</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Romney 2 days. Edwards said it so many times, but i know he said it maybe 3&lt;br&gt;days before quitting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Huckabee was probably the most consistent. And I forgot about Richardson.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hillary will stay in longer, because she's got to fundraise to pay back ton&lt;br&gt;of debts, and she still thinks she's got an outside shot. So it ain't over&lt;br&gt;'til it's over.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But it's heading towards over...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:59:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 22,000 in Pennsylvania for Obama</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/22000-in-pennsy.html',%20283318L)#comment-283318</link><description>&lt;p&gt;isn't it though? love it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:17:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Well, they finally caught Obama...</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/well-they-final.html',%20283614L)#comment-283614</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yeah, isn't it funny? i'd give the WaPo shit for having put this story on&lt;br&gt;A1, but between the lines it's got really fascinating biographical material,&lt;br&gt;and they also are the ones who exposed the bosnia thing in the most emphatic&lt;br&gt;way. (i mean how valuable were those 4 pinocchios!)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:11:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 22,000 in Pennsylvania for Obama</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/22000-in-pennsy.html',%20283616L)#comment-283616</link><description>&lt;p&gt;doubtful that he could win pa -- but even if he gets within single digits,&lt;br&gt;it will probably be seen as a victory.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:12:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Funny video...</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/funny-video.html',%20284292L)#comment-284292</link><description>&lt;p&gt;McSame, perchance?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:02:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stuff I should have blogged - Saturday morning</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/03/stuff-i-shoul-5.html',%20288212L)#comment-288212</link><description>&lt;p&gt;AL not FRANK. heheh&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:27:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING NEWS: Hillary Clinton to admit pattern of falsehoods, misleading statements</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/04/breaking-news-h.html',%20289192L)#comment-289192</link><description>&lt;p&gt;:)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:10:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>