Disqus - Latest Comments for Ishiida_Tora

Re: Oklahoma judge rejects challenge to 'permitless carry' law

Ishiida Tora — Fri, 01 Nov 2019 03:48:59 -0000

Not to mention, it appears his finger is in the well *behind* the trigger itself, so he's not going to be squeezing anything but handle accidentally.

Re: Oklahoma judge rejects challenge to 'permitless carry' law

Ishiida Tora — Fri, 01 Nov 2019 03:46:30 -0000

Don't forget the moronic buffoons in SF, LA, Sacramento, Santa Clara, Santa Barbara, Bakersfield etc. Commiefornia is a diseaae ridden state driving a large portion of this idiocy. I can't wait until we can impeach this fool out of the governor's seat here in Cali.

Re: Michael Moore Is A No-Show In Court

Ishiida Tora — Sat, 06 Oct 2018 11:52:09 -0000

It's worth noting that inaccuracies don't make news fake, but rather how far down the rabbit hole said inaccuracies travel. Usually fake news is coupled with a complete lack of journalistic integrity while doubling down on statements made, no matter their inaccuracy. Like calling Trump a racist because he says illegals are bringing rapists and murderers from Mexico. He wasn't wrong, and that's not racism, it's downright honesty. Just look at the figures and anyone with half a brain can see it. But the lefty media runs with that shit like it's the next big thing. No fact-checking, or if there is, they just ignore it. Or purposely twist the truth. Just outright lie to people for the 'feels'. Fuck a leftists feelings. I'll hurt more than just their feelers.

Re: Michael Moore Is A No-Show In Court

Ishiida Tora — Sat, 06 Oct 2018 11:46:45 -0000

Ya'all don't seem to understand how leftist Canada actually is. We got just short of commies livin' north of our borders. That Trudeau fuck is as bad as good ole' "Bread lines are a good thing" commie ass Bernie Slanders... Oh, my bad... Sanders.

Re: Kim Kardashian Changes Her Tune on President Trump

Ishiida Tora — Mon, 06 Aug 2018 01:47:47 -0000

Yes, but you're also assuming that a lot of these drugs are being done as a result of informed decisions. I personally believe in some cases, some people do something thinking they can handle it, but not having the correct amount of information to make that informed decision. And even if they did make an informed decision, it's not helping communities, families, or the addicts any good to put them into a prison environment as that is not going to assist in them becoming cleaned up, nor are they going to come out of prison a "better person". Additionally, some people are forcibly hooked on drugs. Let's take a look at the sex/human-trafficking problem we have in the U.S. The hookers you see on the street are not necessarily there of their own volition. It's not based on informed decisions, it's based on their victimization by evil people.

The more likely situation is as I said before, they will be released with zero tools to avoid the traps they fell into before, nor any tools for succeeding in what we'd like to think of as civilized, law abiding society. So it's about treating the addiction not just physically to kick that bit, but also reconditioning one's mind to resist the temptation to return to it. So psychological tools and rehabilitation along with the physical detoxification of the addiction from the body. The mind must be treated as well. The only way they'll get that help is in a medical facility. The cost of which, ultimately is going to be a small price to pay for cleaner, safer streets. Because we both know that police departments don't make streets safe. They are a reactionary force, not a preventative one, not until they actually start connecting with the communities in which they live and work. And felonies should be reserved for the most heinous or criminally intensive violations. Meaning those that inflict violence on others and/or ultimately violate someone else' rights. In that way, we can strip them of the rights that the more moral and observant of us hold dear, as they've already proven themselves totally irresponsible and even reckless. We have traffic violations that can reach a felony level, and for something for which no harm was actually caused, it's heavy handed. Just because the potential for harm was there doesn't mean the person deserves to be a felon. When they actually harm someone, then it should be a felony.

I do understand where your'e coming from, but punishment is often one of the worst ways to actually stop a given set of actions. Especially when it's by people the 'punished' give zero fucks about (the government). And people in prison are isolated from society, but I don't see a lot of punishment going on unless someone disturbs the overall peace of the prison. Then they get solitary, etc. They have a structured life, and yeah, that can seem punitive, because it's very strict, but it's a strict that they should have gotten as children or they wouldn't be in prison. Prisons are isolation chambers for people that can't work well with others through life. That's what a prison is for. It shouldn't be thought of as a rehabilitation center for people whose worse crime is what they've done to themselves. I believe (based on actual psychological evidence everything I've already stated) that first offenses should mandate mandatory treatment, perhaps house arrest to make it easier to keep an eye on them, as well as frequent testing to ensure they are sticking to their program. In this way, an addicts family is responsible for them during their rehab, and not the tax payer.

Just saying, it's pretty well established that putting someone in prison makes them worse by time they get out, not better. However, I don't mind either the life imprisonment or the outright execution of those members of the cartel with any power in the organizations on a mass scale. They have proven themselves to be sub-human by action. So like rabid dogs, you just put them the fuck down. Like I said, bring the "War" in on the 'War on Drugs'. Cartels are actually attacking American citizens, either by actual physical attacks through their illegal immigrant proxies, or by proxy with the manufacture, distribution and proliferation of dangerous and sometimes lethal drugs on our streets. The legalist in me says 'arrest, convict, deport/imprison' anyone (even a citizen) that has a high level hand in the above mentioned activities. But my own inner warrior sees them as enemy combatants engaged in chemical warfare and wants them all dead. Their families too for good measure. But imprisoning citizens who have through their own choice or not got caught up in something more powerful than them in the form of narcotics, when they haven't hurt anyone outside themselves is to me, tantamount to fucking tyranny.

Re: Kim Kardashian Changes Her Tune on President Trump

Ishiida Tora — Sun, 05 Aug 2018 15:28:36 -0000

The consequences were severe for boot-legging and consuming alcohol during prohibition but it didn't stop anyone then. I don't see how the prohibition is stopping it now. The number of people in for non-violent drug offenses is a prime indicator that it doesn't work. Addiction doesn't give a flying fuck about the law. You know that already.

Re: Hip Hop Star Goes on Epic Rant When She Sees Her Taxes

Ishiida Tora — Sat, 04 Aug 2018 21:56:12 -0000

Why doesn't doesn't she just do like G-Eazy song to pay the IRS and "Fuck him then I get some money" Fuckin' hooker.

Re: Antifa Advises 'Activists' to Bring Guns to Riot

Ishiida Tora — Sat, 04 Aug 2018 20:58:13 -0000

In every place that I've heard Antifa showing up to a rally in this fashion, the overall consensus is that they are doing something illegal, and the cops haven't taken action to stop it. That illegality is wearing a mask to said rally/protest/gathering. The only reason I can think they would not is that the higher-ups in those districts are either in bed with them, or ignorant of their own ordinances.

Re: Antifa Advises 'Activists' to Bring Guns to Riot

Ishiida Tora — Sat, 04 Aug 2018 11:06:45 -0000

We have to remember that Sheriffs are elected officials, which makes them more directly accountable to the people as well. The local Sheriff, if he's got his head on straight doesn't need the police to do shit, they can do it on their own if they decide to. Ultimately as an elected official, they are still civil servants, perhaps more so than cops, whom are showing their colors as State lap-dogs. They should be doing their job and forcing the prosecution to fulfill their obligations and charge and prosecute these shitstains to the fullest extent of the law. And prosecute the Chief of Police there in Portlandia with obstruction of justice and failing to uphold their sworn duty to the people of Portland Oregon.

Remember the days when it was 'To Protect and Serve'? When was the last time you saw that on a police cruiser? And really, this whole L.E.O thing only started in like the early 2000s and everyone just goes along with it. They don't enforce the law. They ensure the courts can enforce the law. They're peace keepers. That's about it. Now they've gotten all self-inflated.

Re: Antifa Advises 'Activists' to Bring Guns to Riot

Ishiida Tora — Sat, 04 Aug 2018 10:58:23 -0000

It's on the cusp of a civil war as well. It will be remembered in history that it wasn't the right that fired the first shot, but it will be remembered in history that it was the center and right that fired the last.

Re: Antifa Advises 'Activists' to Bring Guns to Riot

Ishiida Tora — Sat, 04 Aug 2018 10:53:21 -0000

The masks already are outlawed. It's a felony to wear a mask to such a public gathering, as well as coming with a baseball bat, rope, chain, bike locks, anything that can be weaponized with the intent to do so. And it wouldn't be hard to prove intent.

Re: Antifa Advises 'Activists' to Bring Guns to Riot

Ishiida Tora — Sat, 04 Aug 2018 10:48:40 -0000

Sounds like that Portland Police chief needs a 'come to Jesus' moment.

Re: Antifa Advises 'Activists' to Bring Guns to Riot

Ishiida Tora — Sat, 04 Aug 2018 10:36:28 -0000

Not much left after that goes through you.

Re: Antifa Advises 'Activists' to Bring Guns to Riot

Ishiida Tora — Sat, 04 Aug 2018 10:33:49 -0000

Anyone with a mask at a rally or other peaceful gathering is technically committing a federal felony.

Re: Antifa Advises 'Activists' to Bring Guns to Riot

Ishiida Tora — Sat, 04 Aug 2018 10:31:27 -0000

They have no compunction about attacking innocent and by far more moral and righteous (not self-righteous, that would be them) individuals and causing terror. The fact is, antifa is fascist as fuck and is in fact a disorganization of commie domestic terrorists. So the right should have no compunction about attending a rally with a high state of situational awareness, and armed themselves. With a willingness to kill some wolves, but only if they absolutely must. They are wolves, so it's up to the sheepdogs, especially given how some police departments have forgotten what their fucking job is. Police are trying to ride the fence and playing into liberal outcomes, or they are purposely doing it, either way; They are unreliable to protect anyone. Seems a large portion have gone yella. It's up to the individual to start protecting themselves, and their rights, as well as their families.

Last time Antifa pulled this shit of advising to bring weapons and start their commie revolution, it was stopped by 300 of the III% armed to the teeth. Most of them Oath Keepers. Not a shot was fired, because the left are pussies. Loud, obnoxious, self-righteous, self-serving, narcissistic, unthinking, and quite unhinged little fuckboy/girl cowards.

Whenever you see masked individuals at a rally, advise the local LEOs that they are breaking a federal law which states that it's a felony to arrive at a peaceful protest or gathering with any sort of weapon while wearing masks. Yet that's exactly what these skid marks do. They deserve to take the place of all the people serving life for a first non-violent drug offense. Let those people out and get 'generation idiot' off the street.

These little idiots are funded by George Soros. The man needs also to be locked up as a money-man for domestic terrorism. It would be late justice for all the Jews (his own people) he sent to death-camps.

Re: Antifa Advises 'Activists' to Bring Guns to Riot

Ishiida Tora — Sat, 04 Aug 2018 10:13:17 -0000

It sure as fuck will. III%

Re: Kim Kardashian Changes Her Tune on President Trump

Ishiida Tora — Wed, 01 Aug 2018 21:50:27 -0000

Yes, but jail isn't how you do away with the demand, because the drug trade is alive and well in prisons across the nation. Do away with the demand by getting rid of the addiction in the addict, not getting rid of the person that is addicted. I see your point, I really do, I just see that through actually locking up some users that went from addiction to worse things, it doesn't actually do away with the issue itself, it's just skimming the surface and treating a symptom. Which is more like killing the patient to spite the disease.

Re: Kim Kardashian Changes Her Tune on President Trump

Ishiida Tora — Wed, 01 Aug 2018 18:34:24 -0000

Thank you for your service. While I agree totally you must have personal responsibility, some of what your'e talking about again, is not necessarily something that these people do because they actually like being this way. They don't have the tools to break the cycle. Bad choices or not, if you don't have the knowledge to overcome the problem you succumb to the problem and it exacerbates throughout your life. I'm simply in favor of programs that treat users like people with a problem that can be fixed with some willpower and tools. I hope you understand that. I'm not saying remove accountability, I'm saying that the way we hold people accountable needs a revamp. Also, that some of these people shouldn't be held accountable for their position because in some cases, it was foisted on them, not taken on by themselves. Regardless, everyone deserves an opportunity to do better. Our legal system doesn't exactly foster that, and the War on Drugs certainly hasn't made any headway in that area.

I understand totally what you mean when you speak of the VA, I hear it from my brother often enough, as he works for them in Medford. He also sees some crazy shit from some crazy vets. :) And yeah, dude could be milking it, but his disability status is coming from a VA doctor, so is he at fault for that or is it the doctor that is accountable for enabling? You see how I'm trying to see a much broader perspective than 'it's those people, get them and we're good'. Especially when 'those people' don't really have any real stake in the actual outcomes. Except on a personal level while they degrade into the gutter as a result of their contact with it. Which brings me to my point that jailing users doesn't solve the problem, it just creates more steadfast users. And as I said below, anyone with any addiction is suffering the consequences of those decisions for the rest of their life, even if it's only slightly. Any addict is always an addict even if they clean up totally. They have to live with that, with the changes they put themselves through and the health consequences they will have to deal with the rest of their lives. And some of those are unknown quantities. When people harm themselves, and don't harm others, we can disagree with their thought process and actions, but it's on them, and they have to deal with it. Why waste the resources on people that haven't created a victim of someone else? What people to choose to do is what they choose to do and shouldn't be judged by anyone else unless they infringe on someone else' rights. I don't see drug users doing that until they start robbing people over it, but we're not talking about those people.

Re: Kim Kardashian Changes Her Tune on President Trump

Ishiida Tora — Wed, 01 Aug 2018 17:16:52 -0000

Possession can be either user or dealer. It's not distinctive to one or another as both classes of individual could have drugs in their 'possession'. So I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. That the drug dealers incarcerated aren't significant or the users incarcerated aren't a significant portion. In either case, that users are incarcerated at all hasn't helped anything but the privatized prisons. And maybe some legislators. Aside of that, there's no actual evidence that the dealers they've incarcerated has helped anything either. They aren't big enough fish to make a difference. Regardless, the punishment needs to fit the crime, and more often than not, it doesn't. Especially under 'Mandatory Sentencing' which is a "War on Drugs" policy that has shown zero positive effect, and has shown a vastly negative effect, especially in at risk communities. Now ultimately what I'd like to see, aside from some of my rhetoric above, is a concerted and coordinated effort to decriminalize and engage in an economic war with cartels as a whole, no matter where they operate. If you starve them of money they will also whither and die. If you decriminalize it makes it much easier to starve them out. Black Markets evaporate when you remove the end-user from the chain. You do that by enabling much easier and more far reaching medical treatment policies and actively show addicts the way out, without fear of legal repercussions from an activity that is going to already manifest lifelong addiction repercussions.

Re: Kim Kardashian Changes Her Tune on President Trump

Ishiida Tora — Wed, 01 Aug 2018 17:01:44 -0000

It's not about feeling sorry for people. What I'm talking about is proper medical treatment for people with addiction issues that got onto drugs for whatever reasons including bad choices. Though some of these people are our VETERANS, who didn't have a choice, being addicted to OPIOIDS as a result of legitimate MEDICAL TREATMENT for service injuries. However, there's nothing wrong with helping people that want help. Incarceration, especially in the U.S. has the worst record for actual rehabilitation. Furthermore, there is an abhorrently high number of non violent 'offenders' that are serving LIFE and other exorbitant overly heavy handed sentences because of Mandatory sentencing (War on Drugs policy) for either factual charges of intent to distribute, or worse, trumped up bullshit charges for intent to distribute, or as in the case of this woman - Conspiracy to distribute. And she wasn't ever involved, she was just with this dude, and of course, he sold her down the river. Ain't that rich. I'm not even going to get into how this actually goes after the most at risk communities while totally ignoring the fucking elephant in the room; The cartels themselves, or the domestic producers/dealers on the high end. Or the very real government support and engagement of Cartels for profit (corruption).

You can't stop killer bees going after the drones, you have to kill the queen in the nest. You topple from the top, not the bottom. Additionally, you need to understand something you obviously do not. The dealers, and occasionally the users, are arrested regularly, but they aren't going after the correct people. Also, prohibition just doesn't work. How'd the prohibition of the '20s go? That's right, it didn't. The prohibition created more of a problem, not less of one.

People get on drugs for lots of reasons, most of which they don't need to be punished for, but rather helped. Incarcerating those that have in fact, due to their own bad life choices to do them in the first place or not, been actually victimized as much as anyone else by the gangs and cartels pushing this crap, is absolutely asinine and is a failed policy from jump-street. Not only has it failed, but it has exacerbated the issue many times over. IT has created corruption in and around our government, which has had a far reaching impact on the rest of society in a very NEGATIVE way.

Long story short, you're wrong and here's why; You don't topple an organization by bottom feeding on the leeches at the bottom. You topple it by ending it's leadership with finality. You also stop propagating the addiction issue by actually providing medical help to those in need and want of said help, rather than reinforcing it by throwing said person in jail with little to no help, then expect them to have a foundation to stand on upon their release, whereby they go about doing the same thing because they don't have tools not to.

I'm not advocating entirely for zero punishment in the case of users, but attacking the people that most likely are simply in a bad situation (some like I said, a huge portion, are prescription Opioid addicted United States Veterans) does absolutely nothing to deal with the actual issue. It's treating the symptom, not the disease. My proposal is to deal finally with the disease. Stop criminalizing the usage... Undercut the profits in the black market... How this happens is because if usage isn't criminalized, then medical help isn't refused by the patient on the grounds that to accept help means negating your fifth amendment right. As a result, a user will be more accepting of assistance to put down the crack-pipe and step away from the stove. No fear of jail. This removes another crack-head from the shit-pile to prey upon, so less profits. Multiply this by thousands or tens of thousands of people and you put a nice dent in a Cartel. It's how the 'War on Drugs' should have been handled in the FIRST place.

Furthermore, you finish it off by conducting black book operations actually in opposition rather than support, of Cartels and skip the trial and other bullshit... Just kill the bastards. All of them. If you're going to call it a "War on Drugs" then you should be prepared to 'bring the f'n war'.

And I agree fully with your last statement, but also that comes into getting the state out of Parental affairs and letting parents be parents again. Gotta teach personal responsibility from a young age or it doesn't take.

Re: Kim Kardashian Changes Her Tune on President Trump

Ishiida Tora — Wed, 01 Aug 2018 16:58:34 -0000

Slaughter enough of 'em, they'll eventually stop. That's a fact. People will realize that to engage in that sort of endeavor and especially getting that big will be a death sentence they can't escape and will come at any time in the middle of any night. They'll stop going that route and find another. After all, it's actually how they conduct business. It's what they understand most readily.

And it's actually, as long as this society has drug addicts afraid to get help because it could mean jail-time, then the cartels and domestic gangs have a steady supply of 'customers'. Yes, the coke issue is the coke issue, but it's by far not the worst drug on the streets due to cartels or gangs. Kinda like MDMA, and LSD are not the worst things on the street either, especially given that they aren't even truly 'addictive'. MDMA can be, usually because cut with speed or cocaine. LSD isn't addictive.

But yeah, in the case of cartels, if they can't get government protection, and the leadership is constantly dying because of a given direction the cartel is heading, then eventually, it will come to a point of excessive attrition.

Re: Kim Kardashian Changes Her Tune on President Trump

Ishiida Tora — Wed, 01 Aug 2018 03:10:38 -0000

Going after the users is how we got where we are. The Cartels are still kicking and no matter how many users we imprison it's not going to stop the Cartel. The only stop to the Cartel is when you send in SF to do the job permanently with no trial, just; "Nope, we're done with you, say bye bye! Don't worry, your 'family' is coming along right behind you.' And then a bullet to the dome. The users need medical treatment, not jail time. You only kill a Cartel by chopping off every head that rises up.

Re: Watch Tucker Carlson School This Anti-NRA Candidate

Ishiida Tora — Thu, 17 May 2018 21:47:19 -0000

By that I hope you mean 'guns to qualified responsible citizens only'. Because we have that, but criminals will always find a way, so protecting the continued right of qualified responsible people to own and operate their own arms is the only way to stop the deranged and irresponsible/criminal.

Re: Liberal Congress Woman Makes Insane Claim About The NRA

Ishiida Tora — Thu, 17 May 2018 21:13:37 -0000

This meme reminds me of 'this is your brain on drugs' for some reason.

Re: Liberal Congress Woman Makes Insane Claim About The NRA

Ishiida Tora — Thu, 17 May 2018 21:11:19 -0000

Actually, they have done everything they can not to glorify violence or enable the spread of 'assault weapons' across America. This woman is an absolute... Moron is the only thing I can come up with. They do everything they can to educate on gun safety, responsible ownership, lawful usage, etc. Not something you see terrorist organizations anywhere of any clout doing ever. And 'assault weapons' is a catch-phrase that sounds good, it has zero meaning.