http://disqus.com/by/InnovationHero/enFri, 13 Feb 2009 23:14:32 -0000http://josephsmarr.com/2008/11/10/a-new-open-stack-greater-than-the-sum-of-its-parts-internet-identity-workshop-2008b/#comment-6254290<p>Hi Joseph, I just got inspired! why we don't have "openApplicationID" , a developer signup for single ApplicationID from a provider, and then he/she can use many web 2.0 services from different vendors.</p><p>For example a developer come to plaxo(an openApplicationID provider) to use its API and end up using plaxo API(which gives some kind of unique added value) layered on top of "many other Web2.0 APIs" that all integrate seamlessly together because of that "openApplicationID" and by seamlessly I imagine if the application chooses DISQUS for making comments then Blogger, youTube, and Flikr comments functionality will be overridden by the openApplicationID provider to give the application a way for using DISQUS for all of them and then port comments back to blogger, youtube and flikr; and so on! is this a good idea that might scale?</p><p>Maybe google app engine team will do it "their way" at some point!!</p>InnovationHeroFri, 13 Feb 2009 23:14:32 -0000http://josephsmarr.com/about/#comment-6239882<p>looks like Bill Gates 2.0, smarter and comes with a far more superior aggregation vision =) this collaborate rather than compete mentality is what actually makes the world a better, more enjoyable place. RESPECT!</p><p>Just watched your talk about AOuth, OpenID, OpenSocial, your terminology of perception about the Web challenges is outstanding! </p>InnovationHeroFri, 13 Feb 2009 10:23:41 -0000