<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for HeadlessZeke</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/HeadlessZeke/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/HeadlessZeke/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:46:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Jasager: On the Defensive</title><link>http://www.room362.com/archives/198-jasager-on-the-defensive.html#comment-10353195</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been playing around with an idea for hunting Jasager AP's for a while now. I think I've got an idea that will work, but it's purely theoretical at this point. I know it's possible to localize an AP using signal strength/angle of arival, etc. So, if you build a device with an xbee module in it that automatically tries to join an AP with an SSID of a long string of random integers or characters (which wouldn't be likely to exist in the real world) you could potentially track down the physical location of a Jasager using a hotter-colder method of sorts. Power cycling the device would result in a new random SSID being generated, making it hard to be blacklisted by the Jasager. Thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PS: I already call dibs on the name "Jaseeker" for the device.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;HeadlessZeke&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HeadlessZeke</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:46:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>