<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for GregSJ</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/GregSJ/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/GregSJ/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:57:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://dogsocietymockup.tumblr.com/post/6074807052</title><link>http://dogsocietymockup.tumblr.com/post/6074807052#comment-239106763</link><description>&lt;p&gt;rep ipsum loquitor&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregSJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:57:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Time Has Come</title><link>http://www.deliciousbynature.com/blog/?p=462#comment-42124739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're back. Yay!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregSJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:57:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Custom windows mobile ROMs &amp;#8211; where do you get your ROM fix from ?</title><link>http://www.1800pocketpc.com/custom-windows-mobile-roms-where-do-you-get-your-rom-fix-from/#comment-38883510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ppcgeeks for the most part. occasionally xda or &lt;a href="http://mobileunderground.info" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="mobileunderground.info"&gt;mobileunderground.info&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregSJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:16:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fennec for Windows Mobile Alpha 4</title><link>http://www.1800pocketpc.com/fennec-for-windows-mobile-alpha-4/#comment-35295945</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I believe alpha 1 was Fennec 1.0 (alpha 3 was Fennec 1.0 alpha 3).  Whereas alpha 4 is Fennec &lt;b&gt;1.1&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregSJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:20:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fennec for Windows Mobile Alpha 4</title><link>http://www.1800pocketpc.com/fennec-for-windows-mobile-alpha-4/#comment-35291160</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fennec alpha 4 is Fennec 1.1 alpha 1 available here:&lt;a href="http://download.mozilla.org/?product=fennec-1.1a1&amp;amp;os=winmo&amp;amp;lang=en-US&amp;amp;%20%20%3Chttp://download.mozilla.org/?product=fennec-1.1a1&amp;amp;os=winmo&amp;amp;lang=en-US&amp;amp;type=exe" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://download.mozilla.org/?product=fennec-1.1a1&amp;amp;os=winmo&amp;amp;lang=en-US&amp;amp;%20%20%3Chttp://download.mozilla.org/?product=fennec-1.1a1&amp;amp;os=winmo&amp;amp;lang=en-US&amp;amp;type=exe"&gt;http://download.mozilla.org...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregSJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:14:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Raw Cereal?</title><link>http://www.deliciousbynature.com/?p=429#comment-19592688</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems like the real moral of the story is don't become a rat in a lab ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregSJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:06:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Changes</title><link>http://www.deliciousbynature.com/?p=422#comment-18728403</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations! I'm so excited for you!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregSJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:30:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chocolate Covered Fun</title><link>http://www.deliciousbynature.com/?p=391#comment-17137138</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The third beer in the flight was a brown ale.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It was really a great experience and I highly recommend it to anyone if they do it again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The event ended with a take home bag which featured some chocolate ice cream from Rechiutti.  I may have to start a campaign to get him to start selling it in his store.  It is delicious (trust me I am an expert on chocolate ice cream).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregSJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:11:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Rhetoric of Copyright Piracy</title><link>http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/the-rhetoric-of-copyright-piracy/#comment-11998034</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Leigh,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for joining the discussion!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree that education is important, but I don't think it will be as successful as your website seems to indicate you believe it will be.  The RIAA has been trying to educate the public about copyright laws since at least 2006.  Based on the RIAA's numbers piracy has increased rather than decreased during that time.  Personally I believe that education is not a perfect answer for two reasons: First education is not 100 percent affective.  To get a driver's license in the U.S. high school students must take driver's education classes.  Despite the fact that these classes emphasize the importance of not speeding, thousands (if not millions) of speeding tickets are issued in the U.S. every year.  Second, Copyright law is extremely complicated.  For example Microsoft, Yahoo, and Real were just sued two days ago for failing to acquire all of the proper licenses to stream music.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thus I believe that music piracy will forever be a part of the music industry.  However this does not mean that the music industry cannot be successful.  With both education and a rhetoric change I believe that piracy will be mostly committed by people unwilling/unable to pay for music.  Thus this piracy will result in minimal lost sales (if they weren't pirating they still wouldn't be paying).  Given this scenario music need not necessarily add value to sell.  However music has been free to consumers for a long time.  While advertisers paid radio stations licenses, consumers were under no obligation to purchases advertisers products.  A number of companies are trying to transition this model to the internet (e.g. a company I work for &lt;a href="http://www.trueanthem.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.trueanthem.com"&gt;http://www.trueanthem.com&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are a number of exciting and interesting models to sell music being tested right now.  One of the things they tend to have in common is an appeal to consumers to legally buy music (or legally purchase for free) instead of downloading illegally.  I suggest you look into some of them for releasing your upcoming album.  I hope you find one that fits you.  Music is meant to be shared, and I doubt the government will or could affect the sort of changes in copyright law that your website suggests you are waiting for.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregSJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:00:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Problem with EULAs</title><link>http://www.runwiththelaw.com/?p=12#comment-11945375</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bill,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm trying hard not to laugh because I wrote a 40 page paper for my advanced copyright class centered around the WoW Glider case.  While my paper is focused on the implications of the case on Copyright in Virtual Worlds, the case does bring together a large set of issues surrounding modern implications of copyright law.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is my belief that there is a much bigger chance of RAM copying being overruled then the set of issues around EULAs.  As far as EULAs, read the great economic analysis of freedom of contract in &lt;a href="http://www.daviddfriedman.com/laws_order/index.shtml" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.daviddfriedman.com/laws_order/index.shtml"&gt;David Friedman's book Law 's Order: What Economics Has to Do with Law and Why It Matters (particularly chapter 12 pages 148-151)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Later this summer, after I am done revising the paper (I am hoping to get it published), I will post a much longer discussion of both the WoW Glider case and the enforceability of EULAs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregSJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:28:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Rhetoric of Copyright Piracy</title><link>http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/the-rhetoric-of-copyright-piracy/#comment-11941150</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bill,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your comment.  I am no more of a supporter of the RIAA then I am of music piracy.  In fact, I wrote a lengthy post about how I believe the RIAA should not have filed individualized lawsuits (&lt;a href="http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/email-to-an-artist-re-jamie-thomas-and-kazaa/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/email-to-an-artist-re-jamie-thomas-and-kazaa/)"&gt;http://www.runwiththelaw.co...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I believe piracy well never be completely eliminated. Instead I think the music industry must focus on adding value to music to entice purchase.  As the original article points out people are accustomed to getting music for free.  To compete against free the music industry must add value besides the music itself to entice people to purchase.  I believe an example of this is cable television.  Before cable television people were used to receiving all tv for free.  Cable television added value by providing a strong signal to areas which only got poor coverage.  As cable expanded it continued to add value by providing content that was not available on network television.  Now most of the United States subscribes to cable or satellite television.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I believe that for the music industry to succeed it must find ways to add value.  A number of artist and labels are trying different approaches which will be featured in my next blog post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregSJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:43:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amazon, California, and Law Firm Jobs</title><link>http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/amazon-california-and-law-firm-jobs/#comment-11688897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently individual California residents are supposed to keep track of all of their purchases from out of state online advertisers that don't collect sales tax and pay it with their yearly income tax.  Thus the projected income from this change would just collect that revenue from retailers rather than individuals.  I for one did not know that I was supposed to be paying sales tax on online purchases from out of state retailers.  It appears that nobody must know which is why instead of going after individuals the state is choosing to go after retailers. For more info check out the podcast at &lt;a href="http://geekcast.fm/archives/thespew-episode-2-ca-ab178-for-dummie/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://geekcast.fm/archives/thespew-episode-2-ca-ab178-for-dummie/"&gt;http://geekcast.fm/archives...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregSJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:13:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Subscribe by email? Yes Please!</title><link>http://blog.disqus.net/2009/06/15/subscribe-by-email-yes-please/#comment-11066537</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you! &lt;br&gt;This feature was sorely needed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregSJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:12:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Entertainment Industry Value Added Services</title><link>http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/entertainment-industry-value-added-services/#comment-11066449</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unsurprisingly Mike Masnick over at TechDirt has a interesting take on this in connection with the music industry.  For those interested a video of a presentation he gave is available at &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Njuo1puB1lg" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Njuo1puB1lg"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watc...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregSJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:09:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text of Complaint in La Russa TM Suit Against Twitter</title><link>http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/06/text-of-complaint-in-la-russa-tm-suit-against-twitter.html#comment-10494640</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't believe Twitter failed to respond.  The complaint alleges a lot of things, but failure to respond to a take down request is not one of them.  I chalk this up as another lawsuit that does more harm then good. &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/4Yue4" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/4Yue4"&gt;http://bit.ly/4Yue4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregSJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:36:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter CEO On Authentication Of Names Of Twitter Commercial Accounts</title><link>http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/06/twitter-ceo-on-authentication-of-names-of-twitter-commercial-accounts-should-twitter-charge-or-should-twitter-pay.html#comment-10455123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"When you vilify your customers... they stop being your customers."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well said.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregSJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:58:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>