<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Gaia942</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Gaia942/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Gaia942/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:29:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Diablo III and Hellgate: London - Same Genealogy?</title><link>http://blizzardguru.com/2008/07/diablo-iii-and-hellgate-london-same-genealogy/#comment-974576</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ha "The fans hopefully don't notice some of those skills look familiar " theres no way in hell you could over come up with an "completely orginal skill skill while thinking along the lines of a melee fighter they've all been done before in some shape or form orginally takes its place below fun in game creation im sorry.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also i love how you complain about blizz not changing a class just because you want a different looking model and name! Skills have nothing to do with a class do they? dumb c***&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gaia942</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:29:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diablo III and Hellgate: London - Same Genealogy?</title><link>http://blizzardguru.com/2008/07/diablo-iii-and-hellgate-london-same-genealogy/#comment-954235</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i feel sorry for anyone who thought HG:L was going to be a good game even after playing the free demo they put out.... once i played the free demo i knew it would suck. I can tell from screens shots most of the time but actually playing it felt really weak the first dungeon/map i walked into looked really generic and boring it felt like a free mmorpg.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gaia942</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 04:14:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>