<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for FadiPick</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/FadiPick/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/FadiPick/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 06:34:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Top Twitter Tips and Tricks</title><link>http://localhost:85/emarketinguide/?p=51#comment-37958028</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tweepi is super cool :) &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 06:34:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Sacrifice 10 Friends for a Whopper? &amp;#8211; Learn Social Media by Example</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2010/02/would-you-sacrifice-10-friends-for-a-whopper-learn-social-media-by-example.html#comment-34839030</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is an app that should have been created by Google! :P&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:22:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t Have Money for a Real iPad? Cut One Out of Paper</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/02/08/paper-ipad/#comment-33005715</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can we rate this post to be the worst post ever on mashable?!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:12:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Uncovered Myths about Getting Retweeted!</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2010/01/5-uncovered-myths-about-getting-retweeted.html#comment-30215555</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For me it is the other way around, I mean I don't like to include PLS RT in my tweets, but I usually rush on re-tweeting those tweets with PLS RT added to it. People tend to answer help calls. Dan Zarella researched this and concluded that it is more likely for your tweet to get tweeted if you added it :) &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:19:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Awesome Entrepreneur Web Resource &amp;#8211; Shoeboxed</title><link>https://therisetothetop.com/interviews-guests/rise-9-awesome-entrepreneur-web-resource-shoeboxed/#comment-29830101</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your tweet is too long! I had to cut a letter! Is the contest available to all countries around the world?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:15:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 10 Hottest Male Geeks on the Web!</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2010/01/top-10-hottest-male-geeks-on-the-web.html#comment-29825613</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No! I meant among the list above! :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 08:25:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 10 Hottest Male Geeks on the Web!</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2010/01/top-10-hottest-male-geeks-on-the-web.html#comment-29821520</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where is Amer? :P&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 06:17:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome Commercial: Taking Technology Out of Technology</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2010/01/chrome-commercial-taking-technology-out-of-technology.html#comment-28760366</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The video is nice but very slow, I barely pushed myself to watch it to the end.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But hey, chrome is a much superior browser, I love how fast and simple it is! That is Google! I am already sold! Can't wait for their OS :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:35:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Happy New Year &amp;#8211; From Thoughtpick Team</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2010/01/happy-new-year-from-thoughtpick-team.html#comment-27779178</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It was a wonderful start for thoughtpick in 2009 where it managed to establish itself as a very well crafted and important social media blog. I wish you all the best in the year to come.. cheers thoughtpickers :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:14:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter 360 &amp;#8211; A Cool New Twitter App for your iPhone</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/12/twitter-360-a-cool-new-twitter-app-for-your-iphone.html#comment-27533979</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is awesome! I love it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:42:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Web &amp;#038; Internet 2010 Funny Predictions &amp;#8211; Photoshopped &amp;amp; Illustrated!</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/12/5-web-illustrated.html#comment-27449154</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow! Great work Beirut and Roba! :) Loved the twitter island in Dubai! hehehe&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:25:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Information Overload [image]</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/12/information-overload-image.html#comment-27323639</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It has just now occurred to me that social media effect is more important in terms of human life documentation than its effect on media itself. Yes, there has been a major impact on traditional media in different aspects, mostly the way traditional media collect and distribute news, but this is en evolutionary process that affects every industry with new inventions. On the other hand, people has always been talking to each other offline, and we have never been able to document that, now we ARE! We are listening to and documenting the daily details of the man of the 21th century! That is really something :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 03:04:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook&amp;#8217;s Zuckerberg Gets Bitten by His Own Creation: 596 Pictures Revealed!</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/12/facebooks-zuckerberg-gets-bitten-by-his-own-creation-596-pictures-revealed.html#comment-25842487</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Loved it! hehehhee&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:38:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook New Privacy Settings&amp;#8230; Better Now?!</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/12/facebook-new-privacy-settings-better-now.html#comment-25444116</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In the world we live in today, I think that the concerns around privacy is overrated! Privacy is dead, deal with it people! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:24:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Romance Dying? This Twitter Proposal Suggests So!</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/12/is-romance-dying-this-twitter-proposal-suggests-so.html#comment-24995368</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Beiruta, in term of preference, I would go for real roses, but then again, the plant of a cyber roses is romantic indeed :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:32:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Romance Dying? This Twitter Proposal Suggests So!</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/12/is-romance-dying-this-twitter-proposal-suggests-so.html#comment-24948926</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He planted roses for you in his Farmville farm?! No that is ROMANTIC :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is the first time I feel like playing that game :) &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 10:00:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ikea&amp;#8217;s Social Marketing Genius</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/12/ikeas-social-marketing-genius.html#comment-24912908</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brilliant! It is so like Ikea, simple and smart! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:59:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 8 Tips to help you Become a LinkedIn Power User&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/11/8-tips-to-help-you-become-a-linkedin-power-user.html#comment-24195407</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is the option of knowing who visited your profile for only paid subscription? I am asking this because I have noticed it the other day. I don't have a paid account, but noticed that they show people who visited my profile in a side pane, they don't mention the names of the people but the industry they work in. Is that different than what you are saying? I didn't like it, but didn't mind either.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:02:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Digg really &amp;#8220;Dead&amp;#8221;: Statistics Show Otherwise!</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/11/is-digg-really-dead-statistics-show-otherwise.html#comment-24128485</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You make a really good argument! Digg doesn't look dead to me! In the contrary, it is gaining ground!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:27:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NYPD Teaches Criminals a New Way to Fool the Legal System: Facebook Updates!</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/11/nypd-teaches-criminals-a-new-way-to-fool-the-legal-system-facebook-updates.html#comment-24071012</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well that script has definitely freaked ME out :P I would go for the little brother option, or maybe tweet later option of HootSuite!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:22:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Rupert Murdoch be The Savior of The News Industry?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/11/will-rupert-murdoch-be-the-savior-of-the-news-industry.html#comment-24013768</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is a complex situation, I really wonder who is going to end up gaining from this. I mean for News Corp to be out of sight from Google would open the door for other news outlets to shine and gain ground, on the other hand, News Corp is a huge conglomerate, it can make a difference in the search engine war! I, myself, would use Bing instead of Google to read their news. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:28:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: For a better RT chance: Shall I tweet less or more?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/11/for-a-better-rt-chance-shall-i-tweet-less-or-more.html#comment-23816892</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hey sociolingo, I totally agree with you, the length plays a factor here, but I took it for granted for we try to keep our posts titles retweetable here at thoughtpick :) thanks for the addition!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:59:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweet to Win: 15 Twitter Contests Listed &amp;#8211; November 2009</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/11/tweet-to-win-15-twitter-contests-listed-november-2009.html#comment-23521346</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Kevin, thanks for sharing! Go ahead guys and win a Macbook Air!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:37:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stephen Fry: Impressive Reflections on Social Media [videos]</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/11/stephen-frey-impressive-reflections-on-social-media-videos.html#comment-23521105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hey Neal, you have a point, it is annoying remembering all of those passwords, but hey, there is a solution, check out Amer's responce to you, it can help :) &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:24:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: For a better RT chance: Shall I tweet less or more?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/11/for-a-better-rt-chance-shall-i-tweet-less-or-more.html#comment-23520905</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hey man, it is good to see you here. It is impressive that you have that much of your tweets and you only got 25% less RT's! but thinking about it, it is actually less RTs! and maybe you didn't add the factor of your increased twitter followers?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For me, I still can't derive a real pattern, sometimes I get lucky sometimes not! Maybe it has to do with the timing but not sure how much weight is there behind it. I guess that it is best thing to follow your second advice, concentrate on the quality of your tweets and build a good reputation :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers mate! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:18:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>