<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for FFGeekBlog</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/FFGeekBlog/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/FFGeekBlog/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 11:23:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Mizzou Tweet on Diversity Goes Wrong, so Very Wrong</title><link>https://www.riverfronttimes.com/newsblog/2019/10/24/mizzou-tweet-on-diversity-goes-wrong-so-very-wrong#comment-4665493578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whoa, you went from a 9/10 on the racist scale to a 99/10.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 11:23:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Google Cemetery</title><link>https://gcemetery.co/#comment-4226675634</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Inoreader FTW!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 12:34:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: White House: Paul Manafort Plea Deal &amp;#8216;Totally Unrelated&amp;#8217; to President Donald Trump</title><link>https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/14/white-house-paul-manafort-plea-deal-totally-unrelated-donald-trump/#comment-4095770487</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If this follows the same timeline as Watergate, which I think it's likely to do, we've still got six months to go.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 15:28:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: White House: Paul Manafort Plea Deal &amp;#8216;Totally Unrelated&amp;#8217; to President Donald Trump</title><link>https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/14/white-house-paul-manafort-plea-deal-totally-unrelated-donald-trump/#comment-4095767994</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In totally unrelated news, "nothingburger" is the Friday special in the prison chow hall.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 15:27:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: REPORT: Attorney for @CNN and @NYTIMES convinced judge to publicly name Sean Hannity</title><link>https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2018/04/17/report-attorney-for-cnn-and-nytimes-convinced-judge-to-publicly-name-sean-hannity/#comment-3859455585</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Journalists lose all credibility when they fail to disclose their relationships with the people and organizations they report on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 10:36:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: REPORT: Attorney for @CNN and @NYTIMES convinced judge to publicly name Sean Hannity</title><link>https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2018/04/17/report-attorney-for-cnn-and-nytimes-convinced-judge-to-publicly-name-sean-hannity/#comment-3859454028</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In other news, OJ is innocent, according to OJ.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 10:35:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Michael Cohen’s Mystery Client is Sean Hannity Because of Course It Is</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/595672#comment-3858270347</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Best part is, just earlier today they were saying that they didn't want to reveal who the mystery client was because it was "likely to be embarrassing or detrimental to the client." That makes it so much worse you guys! Who gave you people law degrees?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 15:27:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Donald Trump Livid After FBI Raids Personal Lawyer: &amp;#8216;Attorney-Client Privilege Is Dead!&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/04/10/donald-trump-livid-fbi-raids-office-personal-lawyer-attorney-client-privilege-dead/#comment-3848545391</link><description>&lt;p&gt;*nearly chokes on popcorn laughing at "meth addled trolls" remark*&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:17:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Donald Trump Livid After FBI Raids Personal Lawyer: &amp;#8216;Attorney-Client Privilege Is Dead!&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/04/10/donald-trump-livid-fbi-raids-office-personal-lawyer-attorney-client-privilege-dead/#comment-3848541325</link><description>&lt;p&gt;*wipes butter on pants*&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:15:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Donald Trump Livid After FBI Raids Personal Lawyer: &amp;#8216;Attorney-Client Privilege Is Dead!&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/04/10/donald-trump-livid-fbi-raids-office-personal-lawyer-attorney-client-privilege-dead/#comment-3848538819</link><description>&lt;p&gt;*munches popcorn happily*&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:13:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Donald Trump Livid After FBI Raids Personal Lawyer: &amp;#8216;Attorney-Client Privilege Is Dead!&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/04/10/donald-trump-livid-fbi-raids-office-personal-lawyer-attorney-client-privilege-dead/#comment-3848538025</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:13:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Donald Trump Livid After FBI Raids Personal Lawyer: &amp;#8216;Attorney-Client Privilege Is Dead!&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/04/10/donald-trump-livid-fbi-raids-office-personal-lawyer-attorney-client-privilege-dead/#comment-3848536348</link><description>&lt;p&gt;*Gets popcorn*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;*Sits down to watch the Breitbart crowd lose its mind in the comments*&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:12:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here&amp;#8217;s What Happened While The NRA Told Parents Not To Lock Up Their Guns</title><link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/heres-what-happened-while-the-nra-told-parents-not-to-lock-up-their-guns/#comment-918599041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know what era you're referring to when you say that "the rates [sic] of firearm abuse was low," but if you're talking about 30, 40 years ago, then I'd like to introduce you to my friends "data" and "facts." They're great wingmen when you're trying to consider a subject rationally and reach a logical conclusion. See #1 in the link below.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/07/23/six-facts-about-guns-violence-and-gun-control/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/07/23/six-facts-about-guns-violence-and-gun-control/"&gt;http://www.washingtonpost.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 09:44:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here&amp;#8217;s What Happened While The NRA Told Parents Not To Lock Up Their Guns</title><link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/heres-what-happened-while-the-nra-told-parents-not-to-lock-up-their-guns/#comment-918594858</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Again, I don't know why you keep asking me for proof when every argument you've made is based on (clearly uninformed) opinion, but here you go.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/07/23/six-facts-about-guns-violence-and-gun-control/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/07/23/six-facts-about-guns-violence-and-gun-control/"&gt;http://www.washingtonpost.c...&lt;/a&gt; - just read this. Everything in it is backed up with solid sources.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://factcheck.org/2012/12/gun-rhetoric-vs-gun-facts/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://factcheck.org/2012/12/gun-rhetoric-vs-gun-facts/"&gt;http://factcheck.org/2012/1...&lt;/a&gt; - this is a very long summary of the available data, some of which is contradictory, but which tends to point generally to something that seems rather obvious: More guns, more gun violence. Final two paragraphs:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"But among advanced countries, the U.S. homicide rate stands out. 'We seem to be an average country in terms of violence and aggression,' says Harvard’s Hemenway. 'What we have is huge homicide rates compared to anybody else.'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Says Wintemute: 'The difference is that in this country violence involves firearms and firearms change the outcome.'"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 09:39:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here&amp;#8217;s What Happened While The NRA Told Parents Not To Lock Up Their Guns</title><link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/heres-what-happened-while-the-nra-told-parents-not-to-lock-up-their-guns/#comment-918570975</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"They oppose having the firearm under lock and key. I would think that was asinine but I do believe they prefer for people to have them unloaded."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I love how you demand facts from me, and when I provide them, you respond with what you "believe."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 09:07:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here&amp;#8217;s What Happened While The NRA Told Parents Not To Lock Up Their Guns</title><link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/heres-what-happened-while-the-nra-told-parents-not-to-lock-up-their-guns/#comment-917912350</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Did you even read the article above? Follow the links in the paragraph that begins: "However, in multiple press releases opposing bills that would have required adults with children to lock up their guns..."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The NRA explicitly opposes legislation that makes it a crime to store weapons unsafely - which is how kids (and the mentally ill) get them in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 14:41:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here&amp;#8217;s What Happened While The NRA Told Parents Not To Lock Up Their Guns</title><link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/heres-what-happened-while-the-nra-told-parents-not-to-lock-up-their-guns/#comment-917902918</link><description>&lt;p&gt;See m3bosha's reply below. Also, this isn't rocket science - gun violence statistics in first-world countries correlate very closely with gun control laws. Stronger laws, fewer dead kids. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 14:31:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here&amp;#8217;s What Happened While The NRA Told Parents Not To Lock Up Their Guns</title><link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/heres-what-happened-while-the-nra-told-parents-not-to-lock-up-their-guns/#comment-917892661</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, see my reply above.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 14:19:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here&amp;#8217;s What Happened While The NRA Told Parents Not To Lock Up Their Guns</title><link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/heres-what-happened-while-the-nra-told-parents-not-to-lock-up-their-guns/#comment-917891774</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jeez I dunno Jimni27, sounds like a tough assignment. Means I'll have to actually type some words into Google.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nraila.org/legislation/state-legislation/2009/2/mandatory-storage-bill-proposed-in-mich.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.nraila.org/legislation/state-legislation/2009/2/mandatory-storage-bill-proposed-in-mich.aspx"&gt;http://www.nraila.org/legis...&lt;/a&gt; - The NRA opposes this bill which makes "storing or leaving a loaded firearm within reach or access of a minor" a misdemeanor. Pretty perfect example right there. They helped defeat a similar bill in Colorado in 2008 - &lt;a href="http://www.nraila.org/legislation/state-legislation/2008/4/colorado-mandatory-storage-defeated-in.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.nraila.org/legislation/state-legislation/2008/4/colorado-mandatory-storage-defeated-in.aspx"&gt;http://www.nraila.org/legis...&lt;/a&gt; - and they're up to the same stuff in Connecticut this year - &lt;a href="http://www.nraila.org/legislation/state-legislation/2013/1/connecticut-weston-board-of-selectmen-postpones-gun-ban%E2%80%94shifts-focus-to-mandatory-storage.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.nraila.org/legislation/state-legislation/2013/1/connecticut-weston-board-of-selectmen-postpones-gun-ban%E2%80%94shifts-focus-to-mandatory-storage.aspx"&gt;http://www.nraila.org/legis...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://billmoyers.com/2013/04/04/nra-demands-softer-penalties-for-straw-purchasers/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://billmoyers.com/2013/04/04/nra-demands-softer-penalties-for-straw-purchasers/"&gt;http://billmoyers.com/2013/...&lt;/a&gt; - The NRA is opposed to measures that would strongly disincentivize straw purchases (i.e. buying a gun for someone who isn't legally allowed to have one). The recent murder of firefighters in Webster, NY was the direct result of a straw purchase that put a gun in the hands of a mentally ill neighbor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So to recap: You said that you "favor criminal charges for people who allow a gun to get into the hands of a mentally ill family member." However, the NRA opposes laws that make it a crime to a) store your guns unsafely, which of course is how most children or mentally ill family members get their hands on them, or b) buy guns for someone who shouldn't have them. I pointed out that your position was the opposite of the NRA's, and you called me a propagandist. Now that it's clear that you were incorrect, I look forward to your apology.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 14:18:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here&amp;#8217;s What Happened While The NRA Told Parents Not To Lock Up Their Guns</title><link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/heres-what-happened-while-the-nra-told-parents-not-to-lock-up-their-guns/#comment-917802457</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fair or not, the NRA brings it on themselves by pushing the gun debate so far to the right that we've become an international laughingstock when it comes to our gun laws. They're not directly to blame when a two-year-old gets ahold of a loaded gun, but they've helped foment a culture around guns in this country that leads people to treat gun ownership far too casually. Owning a gun (or several) is a cultural thing now, in the same vein as driving a pickup truck and drinking a Bud, and the NRA and their "cold dead hands" rhetoric have been the driving force.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 12:47:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here&amp;#8217;s What Happened While The NRA Told Parents Not To Lock Up Their Guns</title><link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/heres-what-happened-while-the-nra-told-parents-not-to-lock-up-their-guns/#comment-917614569</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, then your position is the opposite of the NRA's.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 09:57:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Fiber expansion: Executive hints at new markets | BGR</title><link>http://bgr.com/2013/05/31/google-fiber-expansion-new-markets-profitable/#comment-916162987</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sure you do. It's stocked with brrraaaaaaaaiiinnss&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 14:59:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could this be the Lumia 925, Nokia&amp;#8217;s highly-anticipated &amp;#8216;Catwalk&amp;#8217; device?</title><link>http://thenextweb.com/gadgets/2013/05/13/could-this-be-the-lumia-925-nokias-highly-anticipated-catwalk-device/#comment-895982263</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How much did MS pay TNW to publish this breathless "leak" of the "highly-anticipated" (by whom?) phone?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 12:13:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Child abuse PSA street-poster has a secret message for&amp;nbsp;kids</title><link>http://boingboing.net/2013/05/07/child-abuse-psa-street-poster.html#comment-889835447</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As far as the kid knows, though, everyone sees the same ad. They wouldn't know that they're seeing something secret.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 13:09:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Testing Post Notifications</title><link>http://www.ntid.rit.edu/ambassadors/testing-post-notifications/#comment-727287082</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also, I'm testing comment notifications!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FFGeekBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 11:30:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>