<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ElDean</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/ElDean/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/ElDean/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:37:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Evidence for influenza H5N1 infections in humans</title><link>http://www.virology.ws/2012/02/23/evidence-for-influenza-h5n1-infections-in-humans/#comment-449216629</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"the true fatality rate for H5N1 influenza viruses is likely to be less than the frequently reported rate of more than 50%" ... I have a very simple question, what would be the 'true fatality rate for H5N1' based on this new study?! (approximately I mean) Since I see it not enough just saying - likely to be less, without giving an estimation, and I think this is what Mike Osterholm alluded to also in the meeting, that anyways it is going to be a catastrophe.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ElDean</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:37:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A bad day for science</title><link>http://www.virology.ws/2011/12/20/a-bad-day-for-science/#comment-392134654</link><description>&lt;p&gt; I am sorry, to take you a step out of the track for the discussion, I just didn't like the smell of pointing out that it is always Muslims being the terrorists (since if you don't know Fatwa is an islamic term). I would like to point out that it was - as far as I know - only Non-muslims who have ever used biological weapons in reality (check WW history) (ah. in addition to Nuclear weapons also!). It seems for me offending for muslims, and if I were you I would more generalize the words. thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ElDean</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 04:57:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Virology lecture #2: The infectious cycle</title><link>http://www.virology.ws/2010/01/26/virology-lecture-2-the-infectious-cycle/#comment-32468356</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Of course bacteria has lag phase!, please check it after me Prof.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ElDean</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:15:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccine: efficacy and safety</title><link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/10/20/influenza-a-h1n1-2009-vaccine-efficacy-and-safety/#comment-20718982</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"ADVERSE REACTIONS information is based on studies conducted with seasonal trivalent Influenza Vaccine ..." this line is written in all the pdf files that you alluded to in your post, does this mean that safety studies are not based on the new H1N1 strain?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ElDean</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:17:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you receiving the influenza 2009 H1N1 vaccine?</title><link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/10/14/are-you-receiving-the-influenza-2009-h1n1-vaccine/#comment-20290684</link><description>&lt;p&gt;a Paediatric Nurse!, she simply should take it :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ElDean</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:20:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you receiving the influenza 2009 H1N1 vaccine?</title><link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/10/14/are-you-receiving-the-influenza-2009-h1n1-vaccine/#comment-20290646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I will not take it, because simply I never did!, (may be I had it once while being a child, but not sure about that!)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ElDean</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:18:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CDC wants the public to comment on H1N1 vaccination</title><link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/08/03/cdc-wants-the-public-to-comment-on-h1n1-vaccination/#comment-13972058</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that this may increase public panic about the vaccine, I think that lots of people are gonna think that the vaccine is not safe enough, and that CDC is not sure about its complete safety, and it needs public agreement of some sort that in case things went wrong&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ElDean</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 07:21:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Riding the influenza pandemic wave</title><link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/#comment-11481447</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think speculation about the future of this new strain is useless, I think we just survey, and wait and see &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ElDean</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:23:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brazilian influenza H1N1 isolate is not novel</title><link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/17/brazilian-influenza-h1n1-isolate-is-not-novel/#comment-11079409</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just Wait and Watch&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ElDean</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:11:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pandemic quiz</title><link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/11/pandemic-quiz/#comment-10783639</link><description>&lt;p&gt;PIGS&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ElDean</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:26:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Virulence: A positive or negative trait for evolution?</title><link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/10/virulence-a-positive-or-negative-trait-for-evolution/#comment-10711909</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IS THERE ANY CERTAINTY IN SCIENCE !, with all this long history with influenza, and with the virus in our hands, we cannot expect what is to come next, I think this is not under any human capability, though I think we should focus on surveillance, my question is: if the virus shifted to a more virulent one, should we just wait and see people die to conclude that it became more virulent !!! aren't there any very early - and I mean VERY EARLY - signs for this kind of shift ?, mmm pig farms surveillance, wild birds, or even if we can make experimental infections with isolates of early next winter and compare virulence with the current circulating one !? ... what do you think ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ElDean</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:14:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: US to redirect $1 billion to study adjuvant for influenza vaccine</title><link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/25/us-to-redirect-1-billion-to-study-adjuvant-for-influenza-vaccine/#comment-9927841</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These are very obvious observations, why weren't they discussed before redirecting money ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ElDean</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 09:18:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Animation of influenza virus replication</title><link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/05/animation-of-influenza-virus-replication/#comment-9049630</link><description>&lt;p&gt;2. I think that the mechanism they employed for emerging of the new strains was wrong, as they considered the new emerging strain of the virus to be of one "new" type (the green coloured particles), though I think this is not the case, many combinations of genetic material exchange could take place between the different viruses, resulting in the production of many new strain - not only one  'green' - and then this 'green' one would be present in a mosaic of different new reassortants, but this would be the only one that have the capabilities to transmit freely between humans ... simply I needed to see not only green colours getting out from the cells, but green and other colours (I think this is now more easy :-)) &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ElDean</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 04:28:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>