<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ElChinoTom</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/ElChinoTom/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/ElChinoTom/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:34:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Friendfeed or Twitter May Replace Katie Couric</title><link>http://spectatorbytes.com/2008/05/04/friendfeed-or-twitter-may-replace-katie-couric/#comment-439435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The New Yorker agrees with you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/NewYorkerDotCom" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/NewYorkerDotCom"&gt;http://twitter.com/NewYorke...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ElChinoTom</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:34:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paying Google for Audiences</title><link>http://spectatorbytes.com/2008/05/02/paying-google-for-audiences/#comment-428137</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting post.  I think this only makes sense if the sites can retain the SEM clicks as repeat users.  Otherwise, the arbitrage will eventually play out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Re: Google, your implication may be right in terms of volume but as you pointed out, these clicks are low cost.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ElChinoTom</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:52:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friendfeed or Twitter May Replace Katie Couric</title><link>http://spectatorbytes.com/2008/05/04/friendfeed-or-twitter-may-replace-katie-couric/#comment-428103</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with you that there is a need for new discovery tools to rationalize the online experience.  I disagree that mobile push / spam apps like Twitter or FriendFeed have the potential to do so.  Rather, if indiscriminately used, they only add to the clutter bombardment.  By way of example, I just logged into Twitter for the first time in months and have ten follow requests from complete strangers phishing for connections.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Aren't blogs and social networks already a much better way to disseminate topics of interest?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Btw, no need to pick on Katie.  She's had a rough couple years!  Besides Twitterers get their "news" from Jon Stewart.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ElChinoTom</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:46:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>