http://disqus.com/by/Doris2947/enSat, 18 Jul 2009 17:05:44 -0000http://louisepalanker.com/post/136748548#comment-12889487<p>Louise and Bloggers, I have never commented online before so here it goes… Yes he was not proven guilty as there was “DOUBT”. The 1st time I believe he was a sitting duck, the 2nd time I believe he was stupidly stubborn not to change his childlike ways. And by the way, only contracts for legal activities can be enforced by contract law, so all of his employees are not bound by their contract to not speak out about illegal activities. His personal life was tragic...did you see his father on the red carpet a few days after Michael’s death when he was asked a few questions, one of them being how is the family doing and he replied “I don’t want to talk about them right now, I want to tell you about my new record company, blah, blah, blah”. Michael’s personal life was also wonderful…he had his gifts, he had his children and friends. If some of you want to spend your energy tearing him down, this is your right. I choose to go along with Deepak Chopra who knew him for 21 years, who recommend the children’s nanny to Michael, who loved him, who knew he had a drug problem and tried to help to him. Deepak said “Michael had a lot of compassion. He had a lot of love. He had a lot of innocence. He had a lot of joy. Michael wanted to be understood. Michael wanted to also create joy for the world. He was the closest thing I ever came across to what I can call the exultation of spirit, the ecstasy that comes to you when you touch that part of yourself which is divine. And Michael gave that to millions of people. And I would like the world to remember Michael, as he was when he was in that ecstatic state.” <br>I say thank goodness for his millions upon millions upon millions of worldwide fans who will keep the memory of his ecstatic state alive. I’ve said enough, we understand each other now. I will not reply to any comments.</p>Doris2947Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:05:44 -0000