<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Dominicponsford</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Dominicponsford/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Dominicponsford/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 04:31:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Former daily editor says up to 80 per cent of UK local newspaper journalism jobs have disappeared since 2006</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/former-daily-editor-says-80-cent-uk-local-newspaper-journalism-jobs-have-disappeared-2006#comment-2643220624</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK I have taken Leicester Mercury out. Let me know if there are anything else you would like to clarify.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 04:31:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Press and privacy: In England what a married public figure does with five paid dominatrices his is own business</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/content/press-and-privacy-england-what-married-public-figure-does-five-paid-dominatrices-his-own#comment-2623020655</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes thanks for flagging.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 06:01:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Former Mirror journalist cleared after three-year Elveden ordeal named MD of Oxford United FC</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/former-mirror-journalist-cleared-after-three-year-elveden-ordeal-named-md-oxford-united-fc#comment-2581763158</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You say potato&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:54:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Former Mirror journalist cleared after three-year Elveden ordeal named MD of Oxford United FC</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/former-mirror-journalist-cleared-after-three-year-elveden-ordeal-named-md-oxford-united-fc#comment-2581710302</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cleared as in 'in the clear'. And thanks Hackademic it is not a basic mistake. If I was arrested for something, charged, and then told all charges had been dropped (there was not even enough evidence to take it to trial) I would consider myself cleared.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:24:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fleet Street survey</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/fleet-street-survey#comment-2524903026</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is what it is. No more no less.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dominic Ponsford&lt;br&gt;Editor&lt;br&gt;Press Gazette&lt;br&gt;@domponsford&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pressgazette.co.uk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.pressgazette.co.uk"&gt;www.pressgazette.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;0207 936 6436&lt;br&gt;07971 402097&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-------- Original message --------&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:54:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spectator editor questions Newsnight&amp;#039;s RTS awards shortlisting: &amp;#039;It was no scoop. That honour belongs to Miles Goslett alone&amp;#039;</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/spectator-editor-questions-newsnights-rts-awards-shortlisting-it-was-no-scoop-honour-belongs-miles#comment-2491819414</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have had to delete the odd post on this thread for blue language, so please keep it clean folks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 07:38:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Believe it or not, survey finds number of people who trust journalists to tell the truth is at a 30-year high</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/believe-it-or-not-survey-finds-number-people-who-trust-journalists-tell-truth-30-year-high#comment-2483094597</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We like to take a glass is half full appoach!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 10:46:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jeremy Corbyn makes light of newspaper attacks in first Labour conference speech</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/jeremy-corbyn-makes-light-newspaper-attacks-first-labour-conference-speech#comment-2289018052</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are a wally. Tricky to have democracy without a free press.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dominic Ponsford&lt;br&gt;Editor&lt;br&gt;Press Gazette&lt;br&gt;0207 9366446&lt;br&gt;07971 402097&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@domponsford&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pressgazette.co.uk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.pressgazette.co.uk"&gt;www.pressgazette.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Sent on the move)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-------- Original message --------&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 06:19:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jeremy Corbyn makes light of newspaper attacks in first Labour conference speech</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/jeremy-corbyn-makes-light-newspaper-attacks-first-labour-conference-speech#comment-2288963087</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For someone who seems to read Press Gazette so closely it is strange that you could misunderstand us so  much. Save Our Sources was nothing to do with payments…it was about police viewing journalists' call records. We've condemned phone-hacking many times and also the corporate failings which led to Elveden. We tend to be supportive of journalists, or at least to see the world from their point of view, as a publication for journalists!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 04:58:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: To pap or not to pap: Some advice on news pictures and privacy</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/content/pap-or-not-pap-some-advice-news-pictures-and-privacy#comment-2215225436</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you fixed now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:24:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: General election voting intentions</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/content/general-election-voting-intentions#comment-2059669468</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would rather stack shelves in Lidl thanks very much. &lt;br&gt;I came to this story expecting to find clear evidence that strongly pro-Tory press had an effect on election result. The evidence is not there.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 07:41:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lessons for journalists from the fake chocolate weight-loss research which duped UK news outlets</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/content/lessons-journalists-fake-chocolate-weight-loss-research-which-duped-uk-news-outlets#comment-2056431612</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It was sophisticated in the sense that a real scientist set up a fake website but carried out a real study which was published in a real peer-reviewed journal.&lt;br&gt;The study looked completely legit.&lt;br&gt;You would think that most journalists would want to know the sample size before running with it. &lt;br&gt;BTW journalists should be skeptical but never cynical in my opinion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:38:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Word on the street: did newspapers influence your general election voting? </title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/word-street-did-newspapers-influence-your-general-election-voting#comment-2026376667</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why self-serving? We took an open-minded look at the research and came to the (surprising to me) conclusion that the biased press coverage was probably not a factor in deciding the election. We thought we would go out and ask some actual people what they thought (again with a totally open mind). They all said press coverage did not influence them.&lt;br&gt;This does not claim to be anything other than a vox pop.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 05:40:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Word on the street: did newspapers influence your general election voting? </title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/word-street-did-newspapers-influence-your-general-election-voting#comment-2024472673</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Its a vox pop&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sent from Samsung Mobile&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-------- Original message --------&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 09:48:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Londoners cautious about further press regulation as Labour pledges to implement Leveson</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/londoners-cautious-about-further-press-regulation-labour-pledges-implement-leveson#comment-1966850258</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's a vox pop. Lot's of newspapers do them. As does the TV news. We were interested to find out what a few random members of the public thought about Labour's Leveson proposals so we asked them. It is not pretending to be a scientific survey. I know there are lots of those too and we have covered every single one of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:22:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jason Seiken departs Telegraph after 18 months as editor-in-chief</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/jason-seiken-departs-telegraph-after-18-months-editor-chief#comment-1945541881</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry Tim, fixed now,&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2015 05:30:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Telegraph strikes back with pledge that no story is off limits and promise of new commercial/editorial guidelines</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/telegraph-strikes-back-pledge-no-story-limits-and-promise-new-commercialeditorial-guidelines#comment-1865469930</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's my take it on it. In a nutshell I have reiterated the point we made in the 2012 Editors' Code review that journalists need specific protection from commercial pressure:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/content/telegraphs-response-obornehsbc-row-does-not-go-far-enough-journalists-need-protection" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/content/telegraphs-response-obornehsbc-row-does-not-go-far-enough-journalists-need-protection"&gt;http://www.pressgazette.co....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PS. It is rather a shame that the Telegraph is not allowing comments on its latest leader (it normally does). Also not been able to speak to anyone there this morning to get more details on it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 06:48:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Football match-fixing prosecutions dropped because of evidence provided by Sun&amp;#039;s Mazher Mahmood</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/football-match-fixing-prosecutions-dropped-because-evidence-provided-suns-mazher-mahmood#comment-1794096920</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am sure we are fine to do it legally. Panorama's justification for exposing him is that they think he is a thoroughly bad egg and think people should be forewarned in case he targets them in an undercover operation.&lt;br&gt;I don't think that case has been proven yet.&lt;br&gt;There is the additional point that he has exposed some genuinely dodgy people so has concerns about the security of himself and his family.&lt;br&gt;For those reasons I haven't followed suit and published the Panorama pic. &lt;br&gt;It makes little difference as anyone who wants to see it can Google it, but we have to follow our own conscience on these things!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:18:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Football match-fixing prosecutions dropped because of evidence provided by Sun&amp;#039;s Mazher Mahmood</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/football-match-fixing-prosecutions-dropped-because-evidence-provided-suns-mazher-mahmood#comment-1794012306</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He has not been arrested or charged with anything yet, let alone convicted, so I am keeping an open mind.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:28:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Editor of rival Reading newspaper leads tributes to seven axed Trinity Mirror regionals</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/editor-rival-reading-newspaper-leads-tributes-seven-axed-trinity-mirror-regionals#comment-1697454042</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Intro fixed now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:52:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chief sub made redundant by Johnston Press doubles his earnings by launching Home Handbook booklet series</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/chief-sub-made-redundant-johnston-press-doubles-his-earnings-launching-home-handbook-booklet-series#comment-1697117670</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He's not a 'chum'. Show yourself sir!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:12:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chief sub made redundant by Johnston Press doubles his earnings by launching Home Handbook booklet series</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/chief-sub-made-redundant-johnston-press-doubles-his-earnings-launching-home-handbook-booklet-series#comment-1697051417</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's Alan Barnes, the franchisee, who has netted £60k.&lt;br&gt;Johnston Press has made an awful lot of journalists redundant in recent years. It's one of the big four publishers so rings a lot of bells for readers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 06:55:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Former Lord Chancellor Falconer says police were wrong to use RIPA to identify Sun and Mail on Sunday sources</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/former-lord-chancellor-falconer-says-police-were-wrong-use-ripa-identify-sun-and-mail-sunday-sources#comment-1626708907</link><description>&lt;p&gt;1. The Sun has said they are going to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal to appeal this. Though most people seem to think this secret court is a waste of time as it almost never upholds appeals over RIPA use.&lt;br&gt;2. I don't think PG has ever railed against the Royal Charter, we've certainly reported on a lot of abuse of it in the industry. Personally I think you could fit a cigarette paper between a Royal Charter regulator and IPSO in practice.&lt;br&gt;3.Again I think PG coverage has been fairly even handed on this. &lt;br&gt;4.The Save Our Sources campaign is targeted at the Interception of Communications Commissioner, the person who oversees RIPA. Ultimately though, it may be for Home Office to amend the RIPA code of practice to ensure that police don't use it to spy on journalists who haven't broken the law.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 05:36:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Protection of sources in peril?</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/protection-sources-peril#comment-1610461507</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The aim of the petition is extremely clear. The Government should ensure that RIPA is used in accordance with the ECHR. Public authorities are using it obtain journalists' phone records in order to out lawful sources. This is a clear breach of European law. We want it to stop please.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We say that public authorities should go to a judge if they want to obtain journalistic material.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 04:19:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guardian News and Media to regulate itself from Monday saying &amp;#039;industry tentacles&amp;#039; reach into IPSO</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/guardian-news-and-media-regulate-itself-monday-saying-industry-tentacles-reach-ipso#comment-1575298105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, typo fixed now, Typo cut and pasted from original web version of Guardian article I believe.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominicponsford</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 10:14:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>