Disqus - Latest Comments for DieLaughing

Re: http://vmarinelli.tumblr.com/post/1280498672

DieLaughing — Sat, 09 Oct 2010 23:08:52 -0000

SEX!!! RAWR!!! THE SEX MONSTER IS LOOSE!!! HIDE YOUR GENITALS!!! RAWR!!!

Re: http://therealkatiewest.tumblr.com/post/1270490559

DieLaughing — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:53:00 -0000

Don't worry. I will totally follow you back when my Tumblr stops auto playing your post. :)

Re: http://therealkatiewest.tumblr.com/post/1270490559

DieLaughing — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:30:41 -0000

This auto-plays on Tumblr and I am unfollowing you because of it.

Re: Three20 project templates | three20.info

DieLaughing — Sun, 08 Aug 2010 16:38:48 -0000

You need to change your BaseSDK to 4.0 and build the three20 library at least once before building your project to create the necessary folders and such.

Re: Three20 project templates | three20.info

DieLaughing — Wed, 26 May 2010 07:42:40 -0000

Looks great. Can't wait to use it.

Re: Add three20 to your Project | three20.info

DieLaughing — Wed, 26 May 2010 07:40:44 -0000

I'm very grateful, thanks. I only wish I had the time to fix it myself instead of shirking it all off on you. It's a very nice library and I hope to use it soon.

Re: Add three20 to your Project | three20.info

DieLaughing — Wed, 19 May 2010 05:30:53 -0000

Sometimes you have to delete the Three20.xcodeproj and add it again. You should also double check your paths. It looks like you have "Three20" and "three20" when it should just be the latter.

Re: Three20 project templates | three20.info

DieLaughing — Tue, 18 May 2010 13:48:58 -0000

Either it is more or less efficient to reinvent the wheel when starting a project. Sometimes you want the wheel, pre-fabricated, and sometimes you see the wisdom in making your own custom wheel. Code libraries are like this.

This code library is missing quite a few spokes on its wheel.

Re: Three20 project templates | three20.info

DieLaughing — Sun, 09 May 2010 22:24:58 -0000

Three20 Objective-C Library Help Notes

In order to properly compile the sample applications you must follow these instructions after creating your new application with a Three20 template.

1) Expand the Frameworks group, right-click the Three20.xcodeproj
2) In the menu, click GetInfo then click Choose path
3) Navigate to your three20/src/Three20 folder and select the Three20.xcodeproj
4) Check the box next to libThree20.a
5) Xcode's app menu, click Project => Edit Active Target
6) Select the General tab and add a Direct Dependency, choosing Three20 bundle
7) Now select the Build tab and scroll down to Header Search Paths
8) Change it from '../three20/src' to '../three20/Build/Products/three20'

You should be able to Build & Run after following these steps. It is assumed that your project is in the same folder as the root three20 folder.

Re: Add three20 to your Project | three20.info

DieLaughing — Sat, 08 May 2010 13:27:30 -0000

CANNOT FIND #import "Three20/Three20.h"

Can you please address this? I've dug all over your configuration files, settings, EVERYTHING, but I obviously missed it. Why the HEADER_SEARCH_PATH error? The latest version 'with templates' just fails miserably. A real waste of time for people who don't have time to waste.

UPDATED:
I was having this error on everything until I followed these steps below. This assumes you've already added the Three20.xcodeproj to your Frameworks group.

1) Expand the Frameworks group, right-click the Three20.xcodeproj
2) In the menu, click GetInfo then click Choose path
3) Navigate to your three20/src/Three20 folder and select the Three20.xcodeproj
4) Check the box next to libThree20.a
5) Xcode's app menu, click Project => Edit Active Target
6) Select the General tab and add a Direct Dependency, choosing Three20 bundle
7) Now select the Build tab and scroll down to Header Search Paths
8) Change it from '../three20/src' to '../three20/Build/Products/three20' or now even maybe it's '../Three20.build/Products/thre...

You should be able to Build & Run after following these steps. It is assumed that your project is in the same folder as the root three20 folder.

NOTE: If libThree20.a is RED then you need to double-click on Three20.xcodeproj and BUILD it again.

EXTRA UPDATE Aug 8, 2010: If you get a "_UIApplicationDidEnterBackgroundNotification" error, then you need to change your BaseSDK to 4.0 and set your Deployment Target to the lowest SDK version you plan on supporting.

Re: Three20 project templates | three20.info

DieLaughing — Fri, 07 May 2010 13:23:41 -0000

"You can, of course, change this if you don't want to/can't follow this structure."

BEGIN RANT:

Really? How? Because it seems like a lot of the problems with ANY tutorial or ANY code example is the myriad of compiler flags, paths, settings and other stuff that has absolutely NOTHING to do with the logic of the solution trying to be created. So it would stand to reason that the MOST IMPORTANT information you could display on a page such as this is ALL THE INFORMATION TO EXACTLY RECREATE WHAT YOU ARE ASSERTING WILL SAVE US TIME.

I don't think I ever spend as long on a problem of logic as I do on broken or missing paths. Way to trail off at the end there. No, no, don't get up. We can figure it out without you. No, no, sit back down. It's not like your code examples should work right away. Everyone should expect to hack away at things that are designed to save you time.

END RANT

UPDATE: All of this has been ostensibly fixed.

Re: Happy birthday, Adam.

DieLaughing — Wed, 05 May 2010 02:50:19 -0000

Thanks. I never liked birthdays, but this one wasn't all that bad. I love all you guys. And yes, I'm drunk right now. :)

Re: iPhone App Builder, a Business Idea - Joe Lazarus

DieLaughing — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 05:30:16 -0000

http://www.taplynx.com/ finally did it.

Re: This CHILD has the best XCode video tutorial on...

DieLaughing — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 05:16:56 -0000

DieLaughing

Re: This CHILD has the best XCode video tutorial on...

DieLaughing — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:52:15 -0000

I have worked with IBM's ViaVoice engine, which I believe is the code library behind Dragon's NaturallySpeaking from http://www.nuance.com/natur...

I have found that to be more than adequate for over 12 years now. I worked for a company VoicePilot that made this: http://news.cnet.com/Short-... a long time ago. I'm not sure where you'd find it today, but I didn't Google it or anything. Hope that helps!

Re: Apple Introduces New Feminine Protection Product: The iPad

DieLaughing — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:39:48 -0000

Way to steal people's content and not attribute their work.

Re: A Little Knowledge is a Dangerous Thing - Norman Clarke

DieLaughing — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 06:23:52 -0000

I subscribe to your RSS and simply love this post. I think I've read it 5 or 6 times now. It's preparing me for the forums; where I will attempt to educate the unwashed masses.

Re: Learning doesn't stop at 22. (Scripting News)

DieLaughing — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:26:46 -0000

By my own metric, 32 years stupid and totally ashamed of it.

Re: Learning doesn't stop at 22. (Scripting News)

DieLaughing — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:44:59 -0000

I think that it doesn't take children as long to learn something as it took their parents because of progress. The world is constantly changing and the youth are more adaptable and less indoctrinated. I think people 1,000 years ago were complete morons, a hundred years ago, really stupid, and a generation before me... lighter shades of that. Ageism to me is any notion whatsoever that *any* two ages are equal. Each individual will express their abilities relatively independent of the arbitrary measurement of time, relying more on situation and experience as a catalyst. I find this argument can be distilled down to whether Batman could beat up Superman. Comparing people *to each other* is just stupid.

Re: Seven 9s and 10s - Fuck you. Put the dictionary away.

DieLaughing — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 03:40:02 -0000

1) I'm not that great.
2) Happen to get just the right letters.
3) My step mother is crazy about this game; I picked up the savvier moves. Like using the word 'savvier'.
4) I'm not a genius; Helen Keller could walk around her house faster than you could blindfolded. I have a disability that makes it *seem* like I am more capable. The game "blindfolds" you, and this just turns into an advantage for me, out of years of practice.
5) From now on I will only use words that make people laugh. If I can.

Re: Seven 9s and 10s - Fuck you. Put the dictionary away.

DieLaughing — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 00:08:23 -0000

I was visiting with my mom and my girlfriend at the time, neither of them saw me using a dictionary. There is more to the strategy of placement in this game that most people don't take advantage of. There is also the luck of the draw. I don't choose my letters. Play me in person, if you don't believe I know basic biological terms and names, obscure Latin titles, or all the two letter words I learned just for this game. I don't always win, and I'm not the best player by far. I do try, though. Hard.

Re: Improv Nerds Only

DieLaughing — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:58:42 -0000

I'm harsh because I'm engaged in the behavior I profess to despise, that of discussing humor. It's just douche bag-y to me and always will be. I feel like a douche bag doing it now, you probably think I'm a douche bag, anyone reading this will probably think we're both douche bags, and I would tend to agree with them just as I tend to agree with what you said.

Re: Improv Nerds Only

DieLaughing — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:20:02 -0000

I completely agree. Where I part ways is where the rules are vocalized, instead of intuited.

Re: Improv Nerds Only

DieLaughing — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:38:14 -0000

Of course you don't.

Re: Improv Nerds Only

DieLaughing — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:00:20 -0000

I think analyzing humor is retarded. I think having to go to school, or even listen to someone else for knowledge, is a sign that you are mentally disabled and need assistance. Allowing other people to define the way you think is stupid. Treating humor like a formula means you will never be original. I disagree with the 'age old improv conversation' statement. A vocabulary for discussing it had to be invented first, and only people incapable of performing without the vocabulary would need it. That means that you'd only have to talk about it if you sucked balls at it otherwise. Basically what you are studying is how incompetent, untalented, people can group together to replicate what the gifted do effortlessly. Long story short, I agree with you. Don't talk about it. Just have fun. If you're not having fun, then you should quit comedy.