<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of Dianne_in_DC</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Dianne_in_DC/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Dianne_in_DC/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 23:23:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hillary adviser invokes the crucifixion of Christ to Hillary's partisan advantage over Obama</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/03/hillary-adviser-invokes-crucifixion-of.html',%20255800L)#comment-255800</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Doesn't it speak to the potential that his "boss" and his wife may not have been the people he thought they were?  Why should he sit back and watch them try to destroy the Democratic party simply because they feel they are entitled to have their dynasty continue?  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:19:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Clinton "misspeak" or "mislead" on Bosnia?   Let's go to the video again</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/03/did-clinton-misspeak-or-mislead-lets-go.html',%20259532L)#comment-259532</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Misspeak&lt;br&gt;1.	pronounce incorrectly&lt;br&gt;2.	express yourself unclearly&lt;br&gt;3.	speak incorrectly&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lie&lt;br&gt;1.	deliberately say something untrue&lt;br&gt;2.	be deceptive&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Clearly the statement and the classification of statement as a "misspeak" are deceptive.  Not only did she misspeak, but she did her best to discredit Sinbad, who accurately described the situation.  Did she forget there were others, including cameras on the trip?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If she wasn't being deceptive, she is delusional, and I'm not sure which is more scary.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:11:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Clinton "misspeak" or "mislead" on Bosnia?   Let's go to the video again</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/03/did-clinton-misspeak-or-mislead-lets-go.html',%20260232L)#comment-260232</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is tonight!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:49:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hillary now claiming that she only "misspoke" about Bosnia once.  It was four times over 4 months.</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/03/hillary-now-claiming-that-she-only.html',%20263540L)#comment-263540</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So, rather than take the heat, Hillary is deflecting again.  For the first time, she has decided to issue a comment about the Reverend Wright issue and says she would have left the congregation.    She needs to get out of the Democratic race before EVERY commercial the Republicans run against Obama feature Hillary as their spokesperson. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:00:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clinton tries desperately -- and I mean desperately -- to change the subject from her lies about the Bosnia trip</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/03/clinton-tries-desperately-and-i-mean.html',%20264093L)#comment-264093</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe she has more in common with George Bush and John McCain than we thought.  Maybe she can help them find the weapons of mass destruction.  It appears that she has Pat Buchanan squarely in her corner now.  Her supporters should analyze why...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:30:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hillary claims she considered joining the Marines</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/03/hillary-claims-she-considered-joining.html',%20266994L)#comment-266994</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it too late???? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:39:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clinton:  I am never getting out of this race.  EVER.</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/03/clinton-i-am-never-getting-out-of-this.html',%20282386L)#comment-282386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's not Hillary's supporters that are the issue; it's her.   She keeps filming commercials for John McCain.  I&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 12:52:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama finally wins Texas</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/03/obama-finally-wins-texas.html',%20286560L)#comment-286560</link><description>&lt;p&gt;She's apparently off writing checks to the small business providing event support in Ohio!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:37:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saturday Morning Open Thread</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/04/saturday-morning-open-thread.html',%20304498L)#comment-304498</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From the New York TImes:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Over the last five weeks, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York has featured in her campaign stump speeches the story of a health care horror: an uninsured pregnant woman who lost her baby and died herself after being denied care by an Ohio hospital because she could not come up with a $100 fee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The woman, Trina Bachtel, did die last August, two weeks after her baby boy was stillborn at O'Bleness Memorial Hospital in Athens, Ohio. But hospital administrators said Friday that Ms. Bachtel was under the care of an obstetrics practice affiliated with the hospital, that she was never refused treatment and that she was, in fact, insured.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 15:22:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clinton's dramatic health care story is dramatic, but not true -- and the campaign never vetted it.</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/04/clintons-dramatic-health-care-story-is.html',%20304841L)#comment-304841</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow-can we please stop this primary soon?  This is getting really embarrassing!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:48:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: People aren't bitter, they happy!</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/04/people-arent-bitter-they-happy.html',%20330966L)#comment-330966</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Clinton his such a regular blue collar person.  Good thing her father taught her to shoot as a child, I'm sure it came in handy when she had to return that fictitious sniper fire.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 11:51:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bill attacks the middle-class, Hillary attacks Gore and Kerry</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/04/bill-attacks-middle-class-hillary.html',%20333527L)#comment-333527</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can someone please let Hillary know that John McCain is looking for a experienced woman for a VP.  She seems to forget that it was not that Gore was an elitist, it was that the voters that were disillusioned with the Clintons that cost him the election (if in fact you believe that he lost, which she apparently does)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:16:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vile, sickening, and filthy</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/04/vile-sickening-and-filthy.html',%20337111L)#comment-337111</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If there was any question that Hillary was trying to damage Barack so that she can run again in 2012 it should be entirely cleared up now.  The Democratic Party needs to step up and take action.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:32:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hillary feeds the right wing noise machine</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/04/hillary-feeds-right-wing-noise-machine.html',%20349591L)#comment-349591</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And Fox News says she won the debate....what a surprise.  Where is her flag lapel by the way?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:24:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blacks think Hillary trying to destroy Obama in 2008 so she can run in 2012</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/04/blacks-think-hillary-trying-to-destroy.html',%20378881L)#comment-378881</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So do whites!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:18:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saturday Morning Open Thread</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/04/saturday-morning-open-thread_26.html',%20383383L)#comment-383383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Really good op in the NY Times&lt;br&gt;OPINION   | April 24, 2008 &lt;br&gt;Op-Ed Contributor:  Visible Man &lt;br&gt;By COLSON WHITEHEAD &lt;br&gt;People think I have it easy, but it’s surprisingly difficult being The Guy Who Got Where He Is Only Because He’s Black.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/24/opinion/24whitehead.html?ex=1209873600&amp;amp;en=62942f459284eb18&amp;amp;ei=5070&amp;amp;emc=eta1" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/24/opinion/24whitehead.html?ex=1209873600&amp;amp;en=62942f459284eb18&amp;amp;ei=5070&amp;amp;emc=eta1"&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 13:40:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saturday Morning Open Thread</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/04/saturday-morning-open-thread_26.html',%20383628L)#comment-383628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem is she cheats... I wouldn't do it!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Clinton challenges Obama to debate without moderator&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By MIKE GLOVER and SARA KUGLER, Associated Press Writer 8 minutes ago&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;MARION, Ind. - Hillary Rodham Clinton takes the debate dispute to a new level, challenging her opponent Barack Obama to face off with her in a debate without a moderator, Lincoln-Douglas style.&lt;br&gt;ADVERTISEMENT&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Democratic presidential candidate said while campaigning in South Bend, Indiana, on Saturday the 90-minute debate would allow two candidates to ask each other questions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Her campaign formally made the offer in a letter to the Obama campaign.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Clinton has been putting increasing pressure on Obama to debate her again before the Indiana and North Carolina primaries in nine days.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:33:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Slate: "Can we please stop pretending she has a plausible chance to win the nomination?"</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/05/slate-can-we-please-stop-pretending-she.html',%20411830L)#comment-411830</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We visit so we can hear what other smart, liberal people are thinking and feeling.  The word "can't" used in this context doesn't necessarily mean that if the stars all lined up she couldn't be the nominee, it means "won't".   If it's Orwellian to want to see you party survive, you're right.  I think you should re-read the book though... it wasn't the hope and change faction that were the bad guys.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 17:05:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Small Democratic donors shouldn't pay off the debt of the multi-millionaires</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/05/small-democratic-donors-shouldnt-pay.html',%20431572L)#comment-431572</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Another great example by the Clintons; spending, and continuing to spend money that they don't have.  I'm with Josh Marshall-let them pay their own debts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 09:34:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clinton sees "white Americans" as path to nomination</title><link>(u'http://www.jedreport.com/2008/05/clinton-sees-wh.html',%20433293L)#comment-433293</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My 77 year old, Greek, uneducated mother is also an Obama supporter, as are most of her friends.  What happened to those of us in MD DC VA DE and all the other 11 consecutive wins?  We should ALL be offended; super delegates need to end this now before the Democratic party explodes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:21:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gee, now they're pulling the woman card</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/05/gee-now-theyre-pulling-woman-card.html',%20442566L)#comment-442566</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As an older white feminist I simply don't get this.  Are we supposed to blindly support any woman, regardless of her seeming lack of ethics?  Integrity is an important quality to me.  Additionally, Obama is as strong civil rights issues as Clinton is.  Does he lose points simply because he's a man?  Clinton needs to go away before she alienates us all...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 08:24:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: "The nutjobs might have been kind of right about the Clintons this whole time."</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/05/nutjobs-might-have-been-kind-of-right.html',%20461156L)#comment-461156</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post!   Any way we can convince West Virginia to succeed, the Clintons to move there, and rule in perpetuity happily ever after?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 06:17:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hillary is now comparing Obama and the DNC to the Republicans who stole Florida for Bush in 2000</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/05/hillary-is-now-comparing-obama-and-dnc.html',%20507079L)#comment-507079</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just wrote O'Malley, Mikulski and Cardin.  We need to put pressure on our Super Delegates; this thing needs to be over....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:25:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Clinton acting out because Obama told her no to VP?</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/05/is-clinton-acting-out-because-obama.html',%20514324L)#comment-514324</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This makes a lot of sense.  I know Maryland is different, but I want to know where all these women who love Hillary are?  I've met one in the past six months.  I'm waiting for Gore to endorse now that she's made the comparisons about Florida.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 20:04:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Arianna declares war on the Superdelegates, and she's right</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2008/05/arianna-declares-war-on-superdelegates.html',%20515272L)#comment-515272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Write to the committed ones too.  These people are supposed to care what happens to the Democratic party.  Threats aren't necessary, but logical arguments (and lots of them) may get them to do what they are already inclined to do...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lauren1959</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 23:23:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>